A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions today seeking to postpone the NEET-UG exams set to be held on September 13.
There are three cases listed. Lead case of Keshav Maheshwari is set to be argued by @advocate_alakh .. the other two of Arijit Sau and Pragya Pranjal too seeks to postpone NEET-UG exams. Pleas filed through @anubha1812
Justice MR Shah: Mr. Datar, all arrangements will be made for the #NEET exams
Arvind Datar refers to UGC judgment by #SupremeCourt
Datar seeks to highlight the example of Bihar where there are only 2 exam centres
SC observes that there cannot be different dates for different States.
SC: Whatever date is fixed, there might be some difficulty
Datar urges for the exam to be considered to be postponed by three weeks
SC points out that a review petition was also dismissed
Senior Advocate KTS Tulsi arguing for petitioners: #COVID19 cases are increasing and now there are 90,000 daily case.
Tulsi shows example of the Bombay HC's recent order where the JC said those who could not appear for the exam should be appropriately considered @MPKTSTulsi
Justice Ashok Bhushan: Whether the students should be considered or not is for the body to decide not for this Court to pass directions on
@MPKTSTulsi cites the Disaster Management Act and says that the students are at a high risk of contracting the virus
Senior Adv Tulsi cites Article 21
Advocate Shoeb Alam now arguing: My petition (Arijit Sau) is different from the petitions so far and is not seeking for deferment of the exams
Alam: I want to point out some lacuna in the guidelines issued by the NTA
Adv Shoeb Alam Alam prays that there might be some facilitation for aspirants to reach the exam centres.
Alam: The local authorities may be directed to ensure that the guidelines are enforced
SC: All this will be done
Adv Shoeb Alam: A slight nudge from your lordships will go a long way. At a time when there is a cap on large gatherings, there are hundreds of students who have to go out to take the exams so a direction from the Court will go a long way
Supreme Court nine-judge bench to resume hearing submissions around key issues regarding religious freedom (Articles 25/26), judicial review of faith-based customs, and the 2018 Sabarimala verdict
#Sabarimala #SupremeCourt
Adv Nizam Pasha begins submissions
Adv Pasha: The reason we were constrained to file this intervention application is because a writ petition came to be filed before the Delhi High Court following the Sabarimala judgment. The petitioner, a law student who had come to Delhi for an internship, visited the Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah and was stopped from entering the sanctum sanctorum, the small enclosure where the grave is housed. She claimed that this was a violation of her rights as declared in Sabarimala.
The relief sought before the High Court was a declaration that the practice of prohibiting women from entering the sanctum sanctorum of the Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah is illegal and unconstitutional.
This raises the issue which has been troubling the Court, namely whether a complete third party, a non believer, can enter a place of worship and demand that matters of faith must yield to their individual claims. This is a stark example of such a situation.
Suo Motu: Brutal Assault on a member of the legal frraternity and need for judicial intervention
Adv: A lady lawyer was attacked. She was brutally stabbed in the office of her husband. She went somehow made PCR calls and the. Hospitals refused to take her in.
CJI Surya Kant: As soon as I got your letter yesterday I registered the suo motu
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: The accused was arrested. The FIR is under section 109(1) BNSS. AIIMS has been treating her. She has been discharged and now in private hospital
CJI: why did hospital denied emergency treatment?
CJI: A letter was received by the office of the CJI. The letter sought urgent intervention in the case of brutal assault of a woman advocate . The photos depicted brutal assault by a sharp edged weapon on the lady lawyer which led to injury in all vital organs of the body. She was stated to be under treatment at AIIMS trauma centre. ASG is present on behalf of NCT Delhi. The investigating officer is also present.
CJI: Husband of the victim is the prime accused and assaulted. There are complaints against in laws who are absconding. It is noted that victim has three minor daughters aged 12,4 and 1 years. The girl child was abandoned by the father. Now they are under care of maternal grandparents.
Delhi High Court directs counsels representing Delhi University, Delhi Police, Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) President Aryaan Maan and other contesting candidates who allegedly violated court orders, Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and guidelines framed for conducting DUSU Elections, to be present before court on next date of hearing.
The matter was listed before Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia.
Court - Where is the university counsel? Where are the students?
Counsel appearing on behalf of Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) representing Union of India and Delhi Police stated that his senior is not available.
[Case of rape of a four year old girl in Ghaziabad]
Sr Adv N Hariharan: They have dragged father and wants to record Sextion 164 croc statement. If investigation is complete then why to record it now. You say chargesheet is filed and now this. Police man can be seen dragging the father. The father is right here. He was asked not to change the statement. If trial is there then he will be summoned. He was dragged by police..these two hospitals have filed affidavits saying the child was alive..where is the need for coercion.
Hariharan: As far as this situation is concerned. The investigation officers etc are behaving very differently. Not a single person examined in the hospital. Why is it that they are shielding the hospital. This requires a probe
Hariharan: no medical attention was given to the child. They had the facilities.
CJI: records indicate as alleged by the father of the child is duly noticed in our earlier order. Petitioner grievance has been that their needs to be fair probe and that there is negligence on part of local police and two private hospitals.
Plea before Kerala High Court alleges nearly 6000 government employees deputed for election duty did not receive their ballot papers in time to vote.
They also allege that they have not received the allowances payable to them for election duty.
The petitioners are members of the Jojnt Council of State Service Organisation of govt employees.
Despite specific directions to pay
₹6000 per BLO for the SIR of electoral rolls, members of the petitioner association claim to have received only ₹2000 for months of work.
"The members of the 1st petitioner association undertook several months of work as part of the SIR of electoral roles as Booth Level Officers, going door to door in unfavourable weather conditions. While the Chief Electoral Officer has commended the BLOs for their work,
the commensurate incentives have not been paid", the petitioners contend.
Supreme Court to hear the West Bengal SIR case today. With phase 1 of the polling over, the court is likely to witness mentions concerning non inclusion of voters, incidents of violence, and the functioning of appellate tribunals
#SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial #WestBengalLegislativeAssemblyelection2026 #SIR @abhishekaitc @ECISVEEP @BJP4Bengal
NIA submits it's first report in the suo motu case concerning attack on west bengal SIR judicial officers
ASG SAV Raju: Give us time for chargesheet. They are neck deep in investigation
CJI: we are granting.
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: Only 136 appeals have been disposed off out of 27 lakhs filed. This is very very sad.