Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 9, 2020 19 tweets 16 min read Read on X
[NEET EXAMS]

A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions today seeking to postpone the NEET-UG exams set to be held on September 13.

@advocate_alakh @anubha1812
#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#SupremeCourt
#neet2020postpone
#ExamsInCovid Image
There are three cases listed. Lead case of Keshav Maheshwari is set to be argued by @advocate_alakh .. the other two of Arijit Sau and Pragya Pranjal too seeks to postpone NEET-UG exams. Pleas filed through @anubha1812

#NEET2020
#neetpostpone
#SpeakUpForStudentSafety ImageImageImage
Item 6 is being heard at the moment by the 3 judge bench
Item 10 (NEET) matter to come up in a bit

@advocate_alakh @anubha1812 @MPKTSTulsi
#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#SupremeCourt
#neet2020postpone
#ExamsInCovid Image
[𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻𝘀 in NEET case]

@advocate_alakh @anubha1812 @MPKTSTulsi
#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#SupremeCourt
#neet2020postpone
#ExamsInCovid Image
Senior Advocate Arvind Datar: NEET exams are starting on Sept 13. We are asking for a postponement.

Justice MR Shah: Mr. Datar, exams will start in a Few days

Datar seeks to Submit before the Court to highlight the practical difficulties

#NEETisSocial_Injustice
Justice MR Shah: Mr. Datar, all arrangements will be made for the #NEET exams

Arvind Datar refers to UGC judgment by #SupremeCourt

Datar seeks to highlight the example of Bihar where there are only 2 exam centres Image
SC observes that there cannot be different dates for different States.

SC: Whatever date is fixed, there might be some difficulty

Datar urges for the exam to be considered to be postponed by three weeks

SC points out that a review petition was also dismissed Image
Senior Advocate KTS Tulsi arguing for petitioners: #COVID19 cases are increasing and now there are 90,000 daily case.

Tulsi shows example of the Bombay HC's recent order where the JC said those who could not appear for the exam should be appropriately considered @MPKTSTulsi Image
Justice Ashok Bhushan: Whether the students should be considered or not is for the body to decide not for this Court to pass directions on

@MPKTSTulsi cites the Disaster Management Act and says that the students are at a high risk of contracting the virus
Senior Adv Tulsi cites Article 21

Advocate Shoeb Alam now arguing: My petition (Arijit Sau) is different from the petitions so far and is not seeking for deferment of the exams

Alam: I want to point out some lacuna in the guidelines issued by the NTA

#neetjeeaspirants
Advocate Shoeb Alam refers to the guidelines and advisory which provides for students in containment zones etc to take the exam later on

#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#NEET_IN_OCTOBER
#speakforstudentsafety
Adv Shoeb Alam cites the Standard Operating Procedure issued which are applicable for all exams

#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#NEET_IN_OCTOBER
#speakforstudentsafety
The three-judge bench observes that the concerned authorities will take all the necessary precautions for the safety of students

Adv Shoeb Alam: (On admit cards) I'm praying that it may be used as a curfew pass

#NEET_IN_OCTOBER
#NEETisSocial_Injustice
Adv Shoeb Alam Alam prays that there might be some facilitation for aspirants to reach the exam centres.

Alam: The local authorities may be directed to ensure that the guidelines are enforced

SC: All this will be done
Adv Shoeb Alam: A slight nudge from your lordships will go a long way. At a time when there is a cap on large gatherings, there are hundreds of students who have to go out to take the exams so a direction from the Court will go a long way

#COVID19
#ExamsInCovidASuicide
Advocate Neela Gokhale seeks to make submissions.

SC cuts short her argument.

SC "We are not inclined"

#neet2020postpone
𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡 𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐓 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟎 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦

#NEETisSocial_Injustice
#NEETpostpone
@advocate_alakh
@anubha1812
@MPKTSTulsi Image
Supreme Court hears pleas concerning NEET 2020 [LIVE UPDATES]
#neetJEE2020 #NEETisSocial_Injustice
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Breaking: Supreme Court refuses to interfere in fresh pleas seeking to postpone NEET 2020 amid COVID-19

#NEET #NEETisSocial_Injustice #neetpostpone2020 @anubha1812 @advocate_alakh @MPKTSTulsi
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jun 19
Supreme Court hears the plea concerning lack of ladies bar rooms across court buildings in India

CJI Surya Kant: I have constituted an All India Judicial Infrastructure committee.

Adv: In Mathura, the ladies bar room is locked. Same situation is in Ghaziabad. 60 percent of courts should have ladies bar room immediately.

CJI: the young lawyer corpus funds is also important.Image
CJI: the issues raised here touch upon larger questions of inclusiveness and long term sustainability of women lawyers in the legal profession. The petitioners have cited lack of ladies bar rooms and other facilities across High court , district court and other court buildings.
CJI: A young advocate corpus fund has been suggested to be formed with the aim that legal profession remains accessible to all. The petitioners have placed on report results of a survey undertaken by them in a structured format. The survey was circulated among women advocates across courts and information was collected from numerous district and taluka courts. The data reveals that in majority of court complexes, either no ladies bar room exists or facilities given is wholly inadequate and other facilities such as washrooms, nursing facilities, creches etc are not available.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 19
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its judgment in a plea filed by Telegram challenging the ban on the platform till June 22 in view of the NEET exams.

Justice Tejas Karia to pass orders at 10:30 AM.

#Telegram @telegram @durov Image
The Court had reserved its verdict yesterday after hearing arguments from Telegram's lawyer, Senior Advocate Dhruv Mehta, and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Central government.

Read the detailed story here:

barandbench.com/news/how-can-w…
Order: After considering all the arguments, we find that given the emergency nature, the reasons supplied are sufficient and government has followed the procedure in Section 69A. The challenge ont eh ground of non supply of reasons can't be held. Both the orders are well founded and supported by reasons. The orders do not suffer from non application of mind. We have also held that under IT Act there is no reason to excluse the platform fromt he admit of "information".
Read 6 tweets
Jun 18
[Sabarimala gold theft case] Kerala High Court today recorded that the SIT has gathered “substantial and convincing materials” indicating the involvement of the accused in transactions relating to the removal and gold-plating of the Dwarapalaka idols in 2025. Image
Division Bench of  Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V and Justice KV Jayakumar were informed by the SIT today that the investigation has reached its final stages. Image
The SIT also told the Court that it is examining the alleged criminal conspiracy behind the transactions and the role of certain Travancore Devaswom Board officials who held responsible positions at Sabarimala during the relevant period.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
Delhi High Court to hear today Telegram's challenge to the government order banning the platform till the NEET UG exams.

Justice Tejas Karia to hear the matter at 2:30 PM.
@telegram @durov @GoI_MeitY Image
On June 17, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had asked for time to file a reply to Telegram's plea.

Mehta had said there were shocking activities on the platform and that despite repeated communication, Telegram failed to act.

Telegram opposed the argument and said it acted proactively to take down the content.
Read detailed story on yesterday's proceedings here:

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 69 tweets
Jun 11
#BREAKING Sheetal Thakur vs Dhiraj Abraham

Supreme Court says Family Courts should ordinarily assess parents first and decide whether psychological evaluation of a child is necessary before directing such evaluation; lays down safeguards against unnecessary psychological assessment of children in custody and visitation disputes.Image
Justice N Kotiswar Singh:

• Family Courts must first appoint a psychologist to assess the psychological condition of both parents, particularly the parent having present custody of the child, before deciding whether any psychological assessment of the child is required.

• No psychological assessment of the child should be conducted if the Family Court, based on the psychologist's report, finds such assessment unnecessary or undesirable.

• If an assessment of the child is required, it must be carried out by an independent child psychologist in consultation with the psychologist already treating the child, with minimum interaction so as not to disturb the child's mental condition.

• Family Courts must remain conscious that a child's psychological needs change with age and may require periodic review and assessment.

• Courts must examine concerns relating to parental alienation syndrome and false memory creation against the other parent, while ensuring the child is not exposed to influences that may foster such tendencies.
Justice N Kotiswar Singh :

• We emphasise our role as parens patriae and held that child custody, visitation and parental access disputes involving growing children are dynamic in nature and constitute a continuing cause of action.

• Parents are at liberty to seek modification of orders before the Family Court from time to time as circumstances evolve.

• Parties must apprise the Family Court of the status of proceedings pending under the POCSO Act against the respondent, as those proceedings may significantly affect decisions concerning visitation and custody rights.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 8
"Delhi will choke. God save us all if this is how you want Delhi to live."

Delhi High Court makes strong remarks over the Central government's plans to take over properties in the Lutyen's Delhi area, including the Delhi Gymkhana Club and the Polo Ground.

#DelhiGymkhanaClub Image
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna made the remarks while hearing a plea filed by the Indian Polo Association over the government's eviction notice.
The Court said that green spaces in Delhi were anyways scarce and the "little green space" remaining in the NDMC area is also being taken over.

The Court questioned if the government is plannig to make high rises in the area.

"Little breather we have in the NDMC area is also gonna go and all of us are going to suffocate and die," the Bench remarked.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(