Supreme Court to shortly hear petition seeking refund of airfare for tickets booked during lockdown.
Centre has recently informed SC that a meeting headed by @MoCA_GoI decided that full refund has to be there for all tickets booked during lockdown 1 and 2
Sanjay Hegde: Centre's affidavit gives an impression that relief is confined to only those who had booked during the first lockdown.
Relief should be granted to everyone whose flights had been cancelled due to the lockdown due to the #COVID19 induced pandemic
Sundaram for (Air passengers association) refers to Centre's affidavit.
Sundaram: If time is to be given to them then it should be till December 31. My money is being retained by them, then surely some reasonable interest should be given. It should be full refund
Mehta explains the categories of bookings the divisions are made in.
Mehta says that as regards in international to keys, refund can only be given for those that were booked from India. If British Airways was booked from London, we don't have the jurisdiction
SC inquires about Hegde's concern that the affidavit talks about only first lockdown.
Mehta says that refund would be for the flights that were cancelled
Senior Counsel Harish Salve (SpiceJet): We are in agreement with the Centre's stand. We will comply with the order
Senior Counsel Arvind Datar for GoAir: We want to put on some points and make some submissions
An applicant seeks to argue on an individual concern.
SC clarifies that court cannot consider every single individual case otherwise it will be unending.
SC says that all stakeholders are before the Court and all the possibilities and situations will be taken care of
Advocate Neela Gokhale for travel agents federation: All our money is lying with the airlines. There is nothing on the affidavit to deal with the travel agents and all of our money is blocked with the airlines
SG Mehta: The Centre consulted each and every stakeholder, including travel agents body
SC: Mr Mehta, there are some clarifications required, you also make those clarifications. You file an additional counter and clarify the points
SC: Mr Mehta, there are some clarifications required, you also make those clarifications. You file an additional counter and clarify the points
Senior Advocate Pallav Shishodia for applicants making submissions for tour operators: We are suggesting that the credit should come in the name of tour operators instead of directly in the name of passengers otherwise it will become unworkable
Shishodia: We would be under the obligation to return the money to the passenger
SC: All persons who have grievances or points to make, file an affidavit
SC: All suggestions should be made in writing. Now this matter is not going back to the government. Whatever suggestions are there, file here.
SC asks SG Mehta: When the lockdown was there and flights were cancelled that is a different subject.
But when the flights are resumed and functioning now and flight operator cancels the flight due to some technical difficulty then what is the position on refund?
Supreme Court grants time to airline operators and all other parties and stakeholders to file affidavits.
Centre asked to file an additional affidavit with clarifications.
Supreme Court is set to examine the Union Government's status report on the "Digital Arrest" cyber fraud epidemic
Top cout will review the coordination between the MHA, RBI, and telecom authorities to curb transnational syndicates targeting Indian citizens #SupremeCourt
In a connected case, CJI Kant remarks "we have seen bank officials are completely hand in gloves with the accused in these cases of digital arrest"
AG R Venkataramani places status report on record
CJI: there are senior citizens.. there was a retired couple. Their entire life savings went away.
AG: Rajasthan and Kerala HC judgments are exhaustive. SOP for now is fairly comprehensive
Supreme Court takes up suggestions seeking sweeping reforms in SCBA elections, including reservation for members with disabilities, 50% relaxation in eligibility norms, rotational representation for women, and inclusion of gender neutrality and ability inclusion as core objectives of the Bar Association
#SupremeCourt #SCBA #BarReforms
CJI Surya Kant: Please give all the suggestions to Adv Pragya Baghel.
CJI to Adv Sneha Kalita: As a woman member, as an AoR and as someone seeking empowerment.
Sr Adv Vijay Hansaria: Suggestion by Ms Kalita on reservation for differently abled is praiseworthy
CJI: yes we will make sure that and we are under an obligation to create the infrastructure for the same.
Adv Kalita: 76 years has passed and we still do not have a woman present of the Supreme Court Bar
. I am stressing on the point of rotational representation
Another woman lawyer: no no that cannot be. It has to be on merit.
CJI: environment created should not look like one is completely dependant for the post. Everytime one cannot depend on reservation
#THREAD Supreme Court is set to hear today West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s plea raising concerns over the SIR electoral roll revision exercise in the State. @MamataOfficial is scheduled to appear in person. #SupremeCourt #WestBengal
Follow updates here 👇
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee has urged the Supreme Court to issue urgent directions in the SIR process, warning that mandatory hearings, document rejections and use of Micro Observers could lead to large scale voter disenfranchisement #SupremeCourt #SIR @MamataOfficial
@MamataOfficial All eyes on the Supreme Court today as a Bench led by CJI Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi, hears Mamata Banerjee’s plea on the SIR process, with the final electoral roll deadline close at hand. #SupremeCourt #SIR #WestBengal
Supreme Court to shortly resume hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria
#straydogs #SupremeCourt
The court is expected to continue reviewing compliance affidavits filed by various states with respect to its 7th November order relating to removal of stray dogs from institutional areas etc.
Yesterday, the Court took a dim view of “vague” affidavits filed by some states.
Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal: Punjab has not submitted any action plan etc.
Counsel for Punjab: there is a budgetary allocation of 11cr. There are 20 dog catching vehicles available. There is a district level committee which we have formed. We have given a full action plan for institutions.
Court: how many dogs have you collected from institutions?
Counsel: for Malerkotla it is 108. I will place as and when information comes.
Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC)'s recently notified rules intended to prevent caste discrimination in educational institutions #UGC #UGCRegulations #SupremeCourt
The rules have been challenged for excluding 'general category' students from complaining under its grievance redressal mechanism #UGC #UGCRegulations
University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 was notified on January 13 and applies to all higher educational institutions in India.
Its objective is to "eradicate discrimination only on the basis of religion, race, gender, place of birth, caste, or disability, particularly against the members of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, socially and educationally backward classes, economically weaker sections, persons with disabilities, or any of them, and to promote full equity and inclusion amongst the stakeholders in higher education institutions."