Lord Keen has defended the Government's position, and his own. His main point was that the Government has not asserted the power to depart unilaterally from a recently-agreed Treaty, just invited Parliament to consider the matter. Over to us! /1
So would it be OK for Parliament to pass a law allowing specific international commitments, recently accepted and passed into law, to be simply disregarded? Lord Keen (wisely perhaps) did not address the moral/reputational aspects of this, but pointed to a "precedent". /2
Not the Finance Act 2013, which may now have been quietly forgotten ... /3
... but s19(1)(b) HRA 1998, which is there in case a Government should find itself unable to make a clear statement of compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights when it introduces a new Bill. /4
(Ironically enough the only example that Lord Keen could give of this - the political advertising ban in the Communications Act 2003, whose compatibility with the ECHR had been considered doubtful - turned out to be fine ... books.google.co.uk/books?id=jBonD….) /5
That "precedent" is illusory. The Comms Bill was feared not to be compliant with the ECHR. The Internal Market Bill deliberately reneges on highly specific commitments (and then tries to keep the courts out). publiclawforeveryone.com/2020/09/09/the… /6
There was no discussion of the Ministerial Code , sanctions for breach of the Withdrawal Agreement , Jonathan Jones's resignation, or the special responsibilities of the Law Officers . /9
But Lord Keen (appearing remotely) survived a battery of hostile bowling, which will soon be found in Hansard hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-09-…. We have a full set of Law Officers still, and a turbulent few months to come. /10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Anderson

David Anderson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bricksilk

8 Sep
Astonishing news. I know Jonathan Jones @PermSecGLD well: he is a lower-key character than his predecessor, but his resignation speaks volumes about the independence bred into all decent barristers. /1
It may not be fanciful to derive from this RT of @davidallengreen another recent sign of his disenchantment: it refers to the ill-judged and derogatory comment by @ukhomeoffice (which @PermSecGLD once proudly served) about "activist lawyers". /2
Principled resignations by senior government lawyers are rare: but remember Elizabeth Wilmhurst en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth…, who stepped down in 2003 over the reversal of her advice on the illegality of the Iraq War /3
Read 7 tweets
5 Sep
STOP PRESS! Just heard from @akulith’s counsel (Sir N Forwood QC and J Flynn QC) that EU’s General Court has suspended the appointment of @akulith’s successor as Advocate General of the CJEU.
Text of the Order is here
It’s astonishing that the Member States and CJEU allowed things to happen in this way, especially given the rule of law issues regarding judicial dismissals in Poland.
Read 6 tweets
23 Jun
64 terrorist attacks in the UK reported by ⁦@Europol⁩ last year - more than in the other 27 EU countries combined! europol.europa.eu/activities-ser… However ...
56 of those 64 were “ethno-nationalist and separatist” (in other words, Northern Ireland-related). Dissident Republicans accounted for all but one of the attacks in that category across the EU./2
And don’t assume from this map, despite appearances, that there were no arrests in the UK for jihadist terrorism in 2019. It rather looks as though the UK, for some reason, continues not to allocate its arrests (281 last year) between different forms of terrorism. /3
Read 10 tweets
22 Jun
The Brexit Bills as executive power-grab: this compilation of Bill-by-Bill reports from two @UKHouseofLords committees lays bare the extraordinary extent to which Parliament and the devolved legislatures are being sidelined, and not only on #Brexit publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5801/ldse…. /1
The report brings back many of my own frustrations - such as the time earlier this year when the Minister (Lord Keen) agreed to amend a plainly unconstitutional clause but the Government countermanded him. /2
But it also reminds us that we are not completely wasting our time. Scrutiny by expert all-party committees, picked up and supported in the chamber of @UKHouseofLords, can curb the worst excesses of governments in a hurry - whatever their political colour. /3
Read 6 tweets
17 Apr
Anxious about leaving home? Take a copy of the latest police guidance with you (England only) college.police.uk/What-we-do/COV…. Useful because it sets out how the police themselves are supposed to interpret the law. /1
I’m glad that good sense has been applied by @PoliceChiefs over (1) short drives for a decent walk (2) stopping to rest or eat on a long walk. Repeated exercise also allowed (though NB not in Wales). /2
All officers should be aware of this guidance, but in case they are not you are fully entitled to show it to them, politely and - this might be the hard bit - from a safe distance. /3
Read 5 tweets
1 Apr
Delighted to see that the brilliant @jeff_a_king has joined the debate on the legal vires of the lockdown. /1
We take the same legal route and agree that the courts have a plausible legal basis for holding the lockdown to be within the powers of the enabling Act. Jeff is slightly less troubled than me by the counter-arguments. /2
Moving on (and noting that Jeff has another instalment still to come), I'll mention a point that is currently largely hypothetical but which Government lawyers will need to consider as they look at the future evolution of lockdown restrictions. /3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!