1. Think the UAE-Israel normalization deal spells the end of efforts to achieve a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Think again. It certainly need not, as @davidmakovsky and I explain in our piece in @washingtonpost:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
2. Some Palestinians feel despondent, betrayed by the UAE, & worry other Arab states will follow the abandonment of the Arab Peace Initiative's sequence: first 2 states, then normalization. Some Israelis sound triumphalist, as if they've rendered the Palestinian issue irrelevant.
3. They are both wrong. The Palestinians are not going anywhere, & there remains no solution that can meet both sides' needs (Israel as a secure, Jewish, democratic state, & Palestinians fulfilling their right to self-determination in a viable state of their own) besides a 2SS.
4. The good news is the UAE-Israel deal could be a much-needed bridge to overcome the current impasse. Skillful diplomacy could use it as a base for renewed momentum toward two states.
5. In fact, Arab states that normalize with israel play a more active role in supporting Palestinian aspirations than those that boycott. Egypt and Jordan have each facilitated I-P diplomacy and counseled both sides against unwise steps, as Jordan did on annexation this year.
6. The UAE could play a similar role, as they already did by conditioning normalization on taking WB annexation off the table. Netanyahu's spin that it is only "suspended" is belied by Trump's promise to MBZ and Joe Biden's firm opposition to annexation.
7. Burying annexation keeps (admittedly difficult) prospects for a 2SS alive. In the shorter term, it can help restore Israeli-Palestinian security cooperation in the West Bank, which has been a stabilizing force for more than a decade but has deteriorated this year.
8. More Arab states speaking directly to Israel may be better positioned to influence its leaders & people than those that boycott. There is little evidence that blocking ties has produced Israeli concessions. Every US administration has advocated normalization as right & smart.
9. The UAE could use its deep pockets to dramatically scale-up economic assistance to help Palestinians build the institutions of their future state. Despite the current UAE-Palestinian Authority spat, it's possible to resume and increase that assistance quickly.
10. Supportive Arab states could also influence Palestinian leaders to adopt more realistic positions on certain final status issues (no right of return to pre-1967 Israel and recognizing Israel as a Jewish state) and to definitively reject violence.
11. A US administration that reestablishes support for a realistic 2SS -- not the false version of the Trump plan -- can try to marshal the UAE breakthrough to support its own diplomatic efforts, even in a period when both leaderships are not ready for a final status deal.
12. But the US can describe an end state that delivers true statehood for Palestinians alongside security for Israel, while taking significant gradual steps on the ground to convince both sides that the other side is serious.
13. That will require shelving many aspects of the Trump plan, which denies Palestinians a viable state with even a modicum of sovereignty. It also harms Israel's security with serpentine new borders and increased friction between the populations.
14. In its essence, the Trump plan creates a one-state reality in which Israel won't remain both a Jewish and a democratic state. That's bad for Israel and Palestinians, but also for US interests, as it will degrade the values-based U.S.-Israel partnership.
15. So no one should throw in the towel. As Israel is more accepted in the region, Arab states, Israel, and Palestinians -- with strong US leadership, can work to make a 2SS viable and advance toward achieving it. I fully expect that's what a Biden Admin would do. End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Shapiro

Dan Shapiro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielBShapiro

13 Aug
1. It has been a long-term, bipartisan goal to pursue normalization between Israel and Arab states. The UAE-Israel announcement is good news, and breaks an important barrier. Everyone should welcome it.
2. Additional good news will be if the announcement buries any chance of unilateral annexation in the West Bank. That's still not clear, but is critically important.
3. Unilateral annexation will help kill any chance of a two-state solution to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It should never have been floated in connection with the Trump plan.
Read 5 tweets
28 Jul
1. Tonight, the Democratic Platform Committee completed its work on the 2020 platform. It was a great honor to serve on the committee and help assemble an outstanding platform that conveys what Democrats stand for & what we will do. I worked especially on Middle East provisions.
2. The section on Israel/Palestine always gets a lot of attention. And what emerged is a platform that sounds like @JoeBiden: committed to Israel's security and legitimacy; to US military assistance; to a two-state solution including Palestinians' right to a state;...
3. ...to opposing unilateral steps by either side, including annexation, that undermine prospects of 2 states; to standing against incitement & terror; to opposing settlement expansion; to restoring diplomatic ties with Palestinians & assistance to the Palestinian people; & more.
Read 14 tweets
8 Jul
1. With all due respect to @PeterBeinart, calling for one state for Israelis and Palestinians is neither original, nor a remotely viable solution to this long-running conflict. It's a disaster in the making for Israelis, the Jewish people, Palestinians, and US interests.
2. His proposal means the elimination of the very purpose of Zionism: the sovereignty in their homeland that the Jewish people deserve and history proved repeatedly they suffered grievously without. It would be an immense historical tragedy.
3. It also fails to answer the need and right of the Palestinian people for independence and statehood in their homeland. Palestinian leaders have often undermined this cause by rejecting negotiations and supporting terror. But failing to fulfill it is another huge tragedy.
Read 12 tweets
20 Jan
1. This is kind of nutty, although undoubtedly, they are seriously considering releasing the plan.
axios.com/trump-israel-p…
2. That's obvious from these reports, and the recent remarks of King Abdullah of Jordan, starting to accommodate (saying he'd try to see the full half of the glass) and Benny Gantz after he met Avi Berkowitz, warning against US interference in the Israeli elections.
3. So why now? When there's no serious prospect of success, no Israeli government that can act on it, Pals will reject it out of hand? Whether before the election or during government formation, it would obviously be done to try to help Netanyahu. He's made clear he wants it.
Read 11 tweets
13 Jan
1. During this moment of protests in Iran following the Soleimani assassination, we might have conflicting emotions and reactions to these events. But we shouldn't get confused. We can revile Soleimani and the Iranian regime, oppose Trump, and support the great people of Iran.
2. As Americans, we have overriding responsibility for our government and the actions taken in our name. Personally, I'm glad Soleimani is dead. He had so much blood, including that of Americans, on his hands, he had more than earned it.
3. But I'm as troubled by anyone else by the recklessness of Trump's decision, based on limited intel which he's tried to inflate ex post facto, &no serious consideration of the major ramifications of such a strategic decision. Amateurish,dangerous national security policymaking.
Read 14 tweets
9 Jan
1. What appears to be the tragic, and at best deeply negligent, shootdown of a civilian airliner by Iranian air defense forces, recalls the chilling summer of 2014, when concerns for civilian airline safety in two countries converged.
2. As US Ambassador to Israel, I was consumed that summer with the conflict between Israel & Hamas, including US support for both ceasefire negotiations and Israeli efforts to defend against thousands of rockets launched from Gaza, which also threatened US embassy personnel.
3. With so much incoming rocket fire, including as far north as Tel Aviv and beyond, the FAA began to express concern about the safety of civilian aircraft flying in and out of Ben Gurion Airport (BGA).
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!