A Supreme Court bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan to shortly hear a plea by former NLSIU VC , Prof Dr. R Venkata Rao, challenging the separate #lawentranceexam announced by @NLSIUofficial , NLAT after #CLAT was delayed
Senior Adv Nidhesh Gupta: The decision of NLSIU to have a separate entrance is violative of the by-laws. @NLSIUofficial#NLAT2020
Senior Advocate Nidhesh Gupta: In so far as examinations are concerned, pleas look at powers and duties of academic council. Now look at the memorandum of association signed by consortium of national law universities. It was agreed that there would be a common exam
Senior Adv Gupta takes the bench through the meaning of a member institute in the consortium to prove that @NLSIUofficial is a part of the consortium.
Bye-laws have a provision regarding how a common exam will govern admissions to PG and UG law courses across all the NLUs.
Senior Adv Gupta: The decision of the consortium taken on August 10 that CLAT 2020 will be held on September 7. VC of @NLSIUofficial is a signatory.
On August 28 it was decided that CLAT 2020 would be postponed to Sept 20 due to floods and #COVID19
Senior Adv Gupta: They contend thereafter that they will hold a separate law entrance exam, NLAT 2020. They say they have a trimester system with 20 hrs academic sessions each week and delayed exams will hamper the academic year. This is what @NLSIUofficial states for NLAT
Justice Bhushan: Main question is can NLSIU hold a separate entrance not the mode.
Senior Adv Gopal Shankarnarayan appears for the petitioner.
Senior Adv Arvind Datar appears for NLSIU
Senior Adv PS Narasimha appears for the consortium
Shankarnarayanan: The executive committee took a decision regarding CLAT. Only 1/3rd of the students have registered for NLAT
Justice Bhushan: We are willing to issue notice
Senior Adv Datar: All arrangements have been made, the exam is tomorrow
Senior Adv Narasimha: A press release by the university justifies the action. The consortium will collapse this way @NLSIUofficial
Justice Bhushan: Where is it that the exam is tomorrow? It is not on record.
Senior Adv Datar: We have held two mock trials
Justice MR Shah: Question is, is this permissible? If you don't want to file a counter, we will consider your submission
Datar: @NLSIUofficial is the only one among all 22 NLUs which follow the trimester system. All others have two semester system.
Aug 12 and 18, there was emergency meeting where we said we cannot go beyond September to hold #CLAT2020
Datar: If admissions were not completed by September then the institute would have lost 16 crores by not admitting the 120 UG students and other PG students. CLAT was postponed thrice. Postponement was not ruled out in the emergency executive council meeting @NLSIUofficial
Datar: It is only this one year. Next year we will go back to CLAT.
Justice Bhushan: You have already decided to hold the exams. Students are ready. Hold the exam, but no results can be announced till the pendency of the proceedings.
Justice Shah: NLAT result will be subjected to the court proceedings.
Senior Adv P Narasimha: All the law universities used to hold their own exam. The court considered this issue, the consortium was set up. Justice SA Bobde had looked into this problem and sought to institutionalise this.
Justice Shah: We are passing some order today
Justice Shah: Mr Narasimha, reserve your energy for the next hearing
Shankarnarayanan: West Bengal and Bihar are under lockdown tomorrow, thus students cannot take the NLAT tomorrow
Datar: The exam is online
Senior Adv Gupta: This kind of an exam at home will be a hogwash
Justice Bhushan dictates order: By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated September 3 by NLSIU for admission to the 5 year BA LLB 5 years Hons program 2020-21.
CLAT 2020 is postponed for Sept 20. it is contended that no separate law entrance can be held. Datar states the exam is tomorrow and all arrangements are made. Looking at importance of issues, respondents to file counter to the writ petition. Counter to be filed within 3 days
Let all respondents file counter within 3 days. List this petition on Sept 17.
The bench modifies the next date of hearing to Sept 16.
Justice Ashok Bhushan: NLAT may take place scheduled for tomorrow. No results shall be declared and no admissions to take place in @NLSIUofficial till the pendency of this plea.
Supreme Court three-judge bench allows @NLSIUofficial to conduct NLAT, 2020 tomorrow since all arrangements are made. However no results will be announced or admissions made till the pendency of this case. Next hearing on Sept 16
SC: "NLAT may take place but neither the result shall be declared nor any admission be made consequent thereto. We make it clear that conducting of examination shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition."
Should former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain granted interim bail in a case related to Delhi riots so that he may campaign for the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls as an All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) candidate?
#SupremeCourt to hear @AamAadmiParty @aimim_national
The case comes to a three-judge bench after Justice Pankaj Mithal ruled that bail should be denied and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that bail should be granted #TahirHussain #DelhiElection2025
Hearing to commence at 10:30 am #SupremeCourtofIndia
Supreme Court hears the case where village residents oppose the burial of a Christian man in the graveyard of their village in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar
Son of deceased Ramesh Baghel, a farmer from a Scheduled Caste (SC) community, who has kept the body in a mortuary for 12 days now is before supreme court
Justice BV Nagarathna: Why cannot a person before buried where they wanted to. Body is in mortuary? We are sorry to say that A person has to come to supreme court for the burial of his father. The HC, panchayat etc are not able to solve the problem. The HC says there will be law and order problem.. we are pained at this.
SG Tushar Mehta: if the case is to be decided only on emotions then I have nothing to say, else let it be argued
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: see the real reason, burial not being allowed because the person had converted.
SG: Intention may be to make this a precedent for rest of country. There is burial ground for the tribals who are not Christians. Though they are not christians they bury their dead. When christians die, just 20 km away there is a christian burial ground and they take the dead their and bury them. This ground is a Hindu tribal burial ground. Thus rather than not being vehement that I will not go 20 kms away.. then there are laws..
Justice Nagarathna: but what about burying in own land?
SG: once you bury or cremate someone in a private land the character of land changes it becomes a sacred place and it also has health issues. That is not permitted.. cremation etc is not allowed in private lands
Justice Nagarathna: no no nothing remains after cremation...
SG: it is not about one person it is the beginning of something else.
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking quashing of the entire process of designation of 70 lawyers as senior advocates undertaken by the Delhi High Court
Adv Mathew Nedumpara makes submissions
Justice BR Gavai: How many judges can you name whose offsprings have been made seniors ?
Nedumpara: I have given a chart..
Justice Gavai: we will grant you liberty to amend the plea and if it is not amended then we will take steps accordingly. Tell us who is the signatory to the profession.
#Madrashighcourt will continue hearing today, the batch of petitions on the sexual assault of a student inside the Anna University campus in Chennai.
The vacation bench of
Justices SM Subramaniam and V Lakshminarayan assembles
Advocate General PS Raman: From what we have understood, some things have particularly affected the collective consciousness of this Court- The leaked details in the FIR and the Commissioner's statements in the press conference
Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's order which set aside the appointments in over 24,000 teaching and non-teaching posts in government schools #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial
Sr Adv Vibha Datta Makhija: we would need two days.
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: Yes let us start. No piecemeal arguments.
State: Let the state start.
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi begins for state of West Bengal
Supreme Court hears appeal challenging the Madras High Court's decision to allow Carnatic vocalist TM Krishna to receive the Sangita Kalanidhi MS Subbulakshmi Award.
ASG Venkataraman: Award was
conferred and it was greatly publicised. He is a person who made misogynistic comment against her
#SupremeCourt
ASG: the single judge order is in effect. The music academy could not have given the award yersterday. Can an injunction be breached and a public act be committee? Court is not powerless.
ASG: the court can stay this award or till suit is pending the fourth respondent cannot use the name of the award at all
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: Fourth respondent is not represented here as of now.