Lol. It happened again. A journalist calls me about COVID misinformation, and because I'm not as fearmongering as they hoped, they omit me from the article without telling me🙃
This time, it was about growing concern among Danes regarding the COVID vaccine. I said it's perfectly understandable why people are concerned, as vaccines are being developed at record speeds. And just because there's concern doesn't mean they'll refuse a vaccine when it's here
I also stressed that Denmark's own health authorities have raised concern multiple times in national media about some of the vaccines worldwide that are skipping normal procedure to be faster. So why is it so weird that the public is concerned as well?
I'm of course not saying that growing vaccine skepticism is great or that it shouldn't be a concern of health authorities. But I don't think it makes sense to frame concern as some kind of "proof" of a post-truth era or something like that
I also reminded the journalist that a 'like' on Facebook is not the same as a "proof" of intent... Apparently not so interesting...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just realized that several great articles that shaped my thinking on digital media came out 10 years ago this year! Here is a short thread for those interested:
It’s been 3 years since our book came out! To celebrate, I just wanted to highlight some of the great critical research on fake news discourses that has come out in 2021 and 2022.
I’ve been asked for some tips for publishing as a PhD student. So here are 7 things I've learnt. Take what you can use – feel free to add 😊 (thread) #phdchat#AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter#phdlife
(1) Seek out co-authors
You learn so much from working with others! Find people you like to work with, have time for the project and pull their weight. Job titles are secondary.
(2) Aim for acceptance, not perfection
We’re all insecure about our work – especially in the beginning. If your co-author, mentor or reviewer is satisfied with your argument, you should be too!
🎉1 year since our book came out!🎉 I would like to take this opportunity to highlight some of the great research that has come out since, extending our findings and critique of post-truth discourses (a thread, 1/11)
2/11 In our book, we criticize the rise of censorship laws worldwide claiming to 'eradicate fake news.' Since then, @gabriellelim has published a brilliant study of Malaysia's now repealed 'Anti Fake News Law'. datasociety.net/library/securi…
3/11 In a German context, @MonseesLinda has done a great critical study of the fake news debate, showing how media discourses "legitimise security measures that control the spread of news and potentially harm free journalism" (p. 10) tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Last year, a senior scholar reached out to me (a PhD student) to say he would unfollow me cause my tweets were too personal and boring. Based on this, I have a tip: Don't do that.
To be clear, people are more than welcome to follow and unfollow whoever they like. But don't DM people about it. And please recognise your position of power.
Wow. Glad this resonated with so many. Hope others will think twice. I don't have a SoundCloud. But I did publish a book, one year ago exactly actually. You can read about it here.
Former Danish PM, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, called my arguments "completely crazy" on national radio, when I said Facebook hired her to try to avoid EU regulation. Now, she argues against regulation... cnbc.com/amp/2020/09/04…
My arguments and her reaction to it can be found here (In Danish): dr.dk/radio/p1/p1-mo…
And just to be clear: I am FIRMLY against censorship laws. But we desperately need regulation ensuring transparency around data practices, proper conditions for content moderation, regulation around micro-targeting and much more!