David Kaye Profile picture
Sep 12, 2020 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I also have a 9/12 memory. 19 years ago today...
i worked in “L”, the legal office @StateDept, handling int’l humanitarian law (mainly law of war/armed conflict). I came in early that morning and, tho my memory is hazy on the particulars, found a post-it note on my desk.
It was from a senior lawyer, brilliant person who had 20 questions for each 1 of yours (L ppl, familiar?). the handwritten note said something like, ‘david, what if a perpetrator/facilitator of the attacks falls into US hands? what’s their status? criminal? combatant?’
obvious question. an industry of lawyers & scholars developed around it. For me, still in shock of the day before, it was novel. At the time I had only thought about this in context of Israeli legislation on ‘unlawful combatants’, which USG lawyers mainly thought was bad idea.
the initial view of career lawyers, at least at state & defense, was not to get into status. it would lead to uncertainty, fine questions that might be seen to limit IHL’s and human rights law’s protections, confuse personnel in the field, undermine US personnel protections, etc.
but soon began a process of writing at state and elsewhere considering whether 9/11 marked the start of an armed conflict for legal purposes. Again, careers of law profs have been made on this question. The question then had at its core status & prosecution in mind.
eventually a small group of inter-agency lawyers started talking about different models of prosecution. It involved career people & political appointees, some now in the firmament of GOP/Trump lawyering
One idea was a military tribunal (a la ex parte quinn). For career lawyers, it was out of nowhere when pres bush signed executive order establishing them 11/13. I was in Beijing & went online (earthlink!) to learn about it and emailed a colleague, WTF? fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo…
they have foundered ever since, a stain on american integrity & commitment to rule of law. we saw it all in advance. even conservative (by prevailing stds then) columnist william safire saw military tribunals immediately as ‘kangaroo courts’. nytimes.com/2001/11/26/opi…
anyway, that fatefully terrible decision – to treat perpetrators/al qaeda members as combatants subject to military commissions, rather than the criminals they were, subject to US crim jurisdiction – was an answer to that 9/12 question posed by a smarter lawyer than me.
It presaged numerous other terrible/unlawful decisions, & a debate over application of #GenevaConventions. We fought with DoJ & WH beginning early january ‘02. i’m incredibly proud of this doc (& those who helped make it happen, & esp Taft/Powell): nsarchive2.gwu.edu/torturingdemoc…
more back and forth of course. One of the worst memos of that period was a tendentious and malicious one signed by alberto gonzales, then WH counsel, in january. i think i first saw in the washington times. Ugh, i hate even to share it: nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB…
Bush signed this consequential memo on 2/7/2002 pegc.us/archive/White_…
all of this laid the groundwork for the immoral and wrongheaded memos written by john yoo and signed by jay bybee finding the lawfulness of torture. nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB1…
the bush years were marked by secrecy in gov’t, the amassing of executive authority, the taking of inhumane actions, & just awful lawyering. I was proud to work with lawyers at State and DoD who believed in rule of law, but it was deeply embittering.
many of the folks on the dark side, the political appointees, have done well for themselves in republican legal circles. several unsurprisingly in the trump orbit.
more than i intended to write, but that’s where my mind leads when i think of ‘the day after’ 9/11. all from a post-it!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Kaye

David Kaye Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidakaye

Mar 28, 2023
anyone can join @ACLU action to support this initiative action.aclu.org/petition/bring…
this follows a major coalition letter to @POTUS in December aclu.org/press-releases…
Read 4 tweets
Nov 3, 2022
Twitter has had a good run. Lots of people around the world have enjoyed the ability to call out corruption & abuse while tagging the abusers; previously unheard voices developed huge followings (for better or worse).
But the new owner's lack of seriousness & forethought, and an almost exclusive focus on the US context, makes me doubt that it will survive to do all that, at least globally. It may not die, but ppl will find others ways to engage.
i would be especially concerned if i were a user in a repressive environment. musk has done nothing to encourage people to believe they remain safe & that twitter will have their backs. worst, though, is that he hasn't seemed to consider the risks users face.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 21, 2022
strong words from @POTUS at #UNGA today on human rights. much to admire, & yet...how much does the United States really use the Universal Declaration on Human Rights to "measure ourselves"? whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
this is as much about us as it is about the rest of the world & I'm glad @POTUS concluded the way he did
and to its credit, the United States actively participates in the [very few] treaty bodies to which it is a party, rejoined the @UN_HRC, leads on some key issues.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 19, 2022
this UK ruling, enabling a #Pegasus case to move forward against #SaudiArabia, is a *very big deal* as a matter of law, a blow against states seeking judicial protection against victims of their transnational repression. a preliminary-thoughts 🧵 theguardian.com/world/2022/aug…
the legal question was, in part, whether the UK courts should follow U.S. court holdings that, for an exception to sovereign immunity to be applicable (i.e., to allow a suit against a state), the 'whole tort' had to take place in the UK.
the 'whole tort' principle, in an age of transnational digital repression, makes little sense and effectively denies victims of surveillance a remedy when the perp is a state, as here (#SaudiArabia using #Pegasus against a human rights defender).
Read 10 tweets
Jul 19, 2021
how should the international community constrain the private #spyware industry? @MarietjeSchaake & i offer some ideas, a framework for global regulation. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
few people have been tracking the global spyware problem as long as @MarietjeSchaake. see this from 2011! huffpost.com/entry/stop-dig…
for a longer study of the industry and tools to address it, see my report to the UN in 2019, dealing with export reg, legal change, the vulnerabilities market, more. undocs.org/A/HRC/41/35
Read 4 tweets
Jul 18, 2021
story after story today expose the abuse of spyware technology developed & sold by #NSOGroup, authorized for transfer by #Israel. read, e.g., @skirchy here: theguardian.com/world/2021/jul…
and this key @jsrailton explainer/thread/compilation here
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(