Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 18 tweets 14 min read Read on X
《𝑺𝑪 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑨𝒍𝒆𝒓𝒕》

Supreme Court to hear plea seeking stay on @SudarshanNewsTV program of #UPSC_Jihad & to balance freedom of speech & expression with the right of a journalist.
@SureshChavhanke
#SupremeCourt
#LiveUpdates Image
SC had observed it would form a committee leading to formation of standards for electronic media. It had also said that one "cannot say that Muslims are infiltrating the civil services." The channel was injuncted from airing any more episodes till further orders.
Centre in its reply has informed SC that it should first regulate digital media as it has a wider reach. Next ir contends that SC should not lay down standards without an amicus or committee of amicus since its one show or a few episodes.
@MIB_India
News Broadcasters Association, on the other hand says their regulations are referred to by various HCs and that they have rules and an authority in place to recieve complaints against electronic media, impose cost on them or even refer them to @MIB_India for license revocation
.@SureshChavhanke @SudarshanNewsTV has informed SC that UPSC Jihad was used as a terminology in the show owing to the foreign funding pooled in by the Zakat Foundation and how "infiltration was happening in the UPSC"
#FreedomOfSpeech
#freedomofpress
Supreme Court to shortly begin hearing the plea against @SudarshanNewsTV program.

Item 16 being heard now. Item 20 is the Sudarshan TV case.

#LiveUpdates
#SupremeCourt
Hearing begins.

Senior Adv Shyam Divan for the channel starts: We have filed our affidavit.

Senior Adv Anoop Chaudhari: We recieved their reply at 12 pm. So many irrelevant things!

@SureshChavhanke
@SudarshanNewsTV
#binsaasbol #UPSC_Jihad #freespeech #hatespeech Image
Divan: Very difficult to prepare the reply in such a short span of time. I understand what other side is saying as I was in the same position last time and was ambushed by the IA

@SureshChavhanke
@SudarshanNewsTV
#binsaasbol #UPSC_Jihad #freespeech #hatespeech
Divan: I have also recieved the other affidavits just now. You all will sit on Monday and can be taken up then or take it up tomorrow. I have a court commitment from Mon which will take time

@SureshChavhanke
@SudarshanNewsTV
#binsaasbol #UPSC_Jihad #freespeech #hatespeech
Divan: Can I place my affidavit with the understanding that it will not conclude today and can continue on Monday.

Justice Chandrachud: the bench will break at 3:15 pm

@SureshChavhanke
@SudarshanNewsTV
#binsaasbol #UPSC_Jihad #freespeech #hatespeech
Adv Shadan Farasat: all the episodes are available on YouTube

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta: Why don't you send a pendrive to the court master

@SureshChavhanke
@SudarshanNewsTV
#binsaasbol #UPSC_Jihad #freespeech #hatespeech
SG Mehta: Since Mr Divan has a professional difficulty on Monday, we can have the hearing tomorrow.

Justice Chandrachud: We can ask CJI to constitute a bench tomorrow for this case and we can have the hearing tomorrow at 10.30 am and finish it off
Senior Adv Anoop Chaudhari: we cannot be expected to file a reply by tomorrow

Justice Chandrachud: How long is the affidavit by @SudarshanNewsTV ?

Chaudhari: 92 pages!
Justice Chandrachud: Mr Divan has submitted his unavailability from Monday. All counsels have agreed for a hearing tomorrow. We will urge the CJI to constitute a bench tomorrow at 10.30 am

SG Mehta: Please keep it at 12 pm
Justice Chandrachud: We will start at 12 and finish it at 1.30 pm tomorrow

Counsel for Press Council of India: Please allow me to make submissions after Mr Divan
Justice KM Joseph: Who is your client, Mr Divan? A Cable TV operator or a broadcaster? Rule 6 applies to the cable TV network operators.

Senior Adv Preetesh Kapur for PCI: Yes that is why electronic media is on a different footing as they use public property like air waves Image
Senior Adv Divan: I had given an assurance that links or pendrives are given to the court Master. It was not given, I will ensure you have the links atleast today via the court master

Hearing ends.
Plea against the broadcast of Sudarshan TV's "UPSC Jihad" show - Supreme Court hearing adjourned to tomorrow: LIVE UPDATES [Day 3]
#SudarshanNews #SudarshanTV @SudarshanNewsTV @SudarshanNewsTV #UPSC_Jihad
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jul 16
#SupremeCourt hears plea by BRS President and former Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao challenging the Telangana High Court's decision to dismiss his petition against a commission formed by the state government Image
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Plain case of political vendetta. Every time the government changes there is a case against the former chief minister

CJI DY Chandrachud: we will clarify that by calling it judicial enquiry they cannot take it outside the scope of the commission @TSwithKCR
Rohatgi: you cannot fix responsibility in a fact finding commission. This was for approval of tariff ..there was a power crisis and thus state bought power from state of chhatisgarh and thus the PPA needed approval from Chhattisgarh state commission and Telangana state commission.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 15
#BREAKING

Supreme Court DISMISSES plea by Deputy CM of Karantaka DK Shivakumar to quash CBI's disproportionate assets case against him under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

A bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma heard the matter. Image
Trivedi J: How High Can stay the sanction order granted by government? This is unheard of.

Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): That is withdrawn already.

Trivedi J to State: That is different thing but how High Court can grant such order?
Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): We are on a new question, the ground is this court has held that if the predicate offence is only conspiracy, it cannot be a stand alone offence and it has to be added by some other offence as well. I am questioning the FIR lodged by CBI which is completely illegal. I am not on any part by ED. I am on the FIR dated 3.10.20 under PC Act by CBI. Section 17A which has come in 2018 requirement has not been fulfilled (referring to split verdict of Justice Trivedi and Justice Bopanna)

Trivedi J: We cannot quash the case on the basis of split verdict by this court.

Senior Adv Rohatagi: But one judge has ruled in our favor.

Trivedi J: So what, that cannot be the basis of quashing. No quashing at all.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 26
[Excise policy case]

CBI to produce Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal before Rouse Avenue Court and seek his custody.

Hearing likely to start at 10AM.

#ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal Image
Kejriwal to be produced before Special Judge (PC Act) Amitabh Rawat shortly.
Arvind Kejriwal's wife Sunita Kejriwal reaches court.
Read 118 tweets
Jun 25
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its verdict on ED's plea seeking stay on bail granted to Arvind Kejriwal.

Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain will pronounce order at 2:30 PM.

#DelhiHighCourt #ArvindKejriwal @dir_ed @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal #Bail Image
Kejriwal was granted bail by the trial court on Thursday (June 20). The High Court put an interim stay on his bail the next day, after ED challenged the order.

On the same day, Justice Jain reserved his verdict on ED's stay application.

Read detailed story here:
barandbench.com/news/delhi-hig…
ED and AAP lawyers present in court.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 15
#Breaking

Delhi High Court orders removal of tweets by Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Jairam Ramesh, and Pawan Khera alleging that journalist Rajat Sharma abused Nayak on live-television.

@RajatSharmaLive @NayakRagini @Jairam_Ramesh @Pawankhera Image
High Court holds that Congress leaders over-sensationalised the incident and did not remain truthful.
"It cannot be denied that the citizens have a right to freedom of Speech and expression but there was also a corresponding duty to remain truthful to the incident. The X posts berating the plaintiff are nothing but an oversensationalization and depiction of facts which are patently false," the court said.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 13
Supreme Court to hear batch of pleas seeking cancellation of NEET 2024

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम Image
Matter before a Vacation Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta. Image
Adv Kanu Aggarwal for respondents : A decision has been taken to allay the fear of students.

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(