Shravana Kumar senses that, apart from feeling guilty of killing an innocent boy, he will invite the wrath of Brahma Hatya Dosha. He says "Oh King, do not trouble yourselves by the thought that you have killed a Brahmana"
2/n
Ayodhya Kanda Sarga 63 Shloka 53
"I am not a Brahmana. I am born to a Vaishya Father and a Shudra Mother"
Shloka 54
Dasharatha describes Shravanakumara as a "tapOdhanaH", one whose wealth is Tapas.
3/n
Ayodhya Kanda Sarga 64
Shloka 1: Dasharatha describes Shravakumara as a Maharshi
Shloka 14, 17: Dasharatha calls Shravanakumara's father "Bhagavan"
Shloka 20: Dasharatha calls him "Muni"
4/n
Ayodhya Kanda Sarga 64
Shloka 21: Dasharatha calls him "Bhagavan Rishi"
Shloka 25: The Sage describes his son as Tapasi Muni and Brahmachari (Killing such a person inflicts a naturally negative result on Dasharatha)
Shloka 29: Dasharatha describes him as a Muni
5/n
Ayodhya Kanda Sarga 64 (This is very important)
Shloka 33: The sage laments "from whom will a listen to the recitation of the Shastra, particularly the one in the night"
Shloka 34: "Who after taking bath in the morning and *Worshipping the Sandhya* will sit next to me"
6/n
Ayodhya Kanda Sarga 64
Shloka 48: Again Dasharatha describes Shravana as a Muni Putra. (He ascended the Svarga along with Indra)
Shloka 49: Again Dasharatha calls him Muni Putra
Shloka 51: Calls his father Tapasa - full of Tapas
Shloka 56: Shravana referred as Muni
7/n
Matter is very clear. Muni-s and Rishi-s could be from any Varna.
- They could perform Tapas
- They could study the Shastras
- They could perform the Sandhya Vandana
- Their Tapas could be of the same impact as others
n/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Enjoyed “Parva - A Play” in English staged by Eneno Are Media and Entertainment and directed by Sri. Prakash Belawadi @BelawadiBlr - at the Chowdaiah Memorial Hall.
Its based on the novel of the same name by Sri. SL Bhairappa.
+
Its 8hours long with 5 Acts and 4 Intervals - A Marathon that runs like a Sprint.
The Hall was full and most people stayed through. It says a lot about so much - Mahabharata, SL Bhyrappa, The Novel, the Staged Version, Shri. Belawadi and the Performers.
And the audience too.
2 heavy assaults on the Indian Culture due to Colonialism/Modernity.
1. Instilled disbelief in Moksha 2. Equated Dharma to Religion
This has drifted us away from our Natural Destiny.
This #Thread is about how Point-1 has spawned a peculiar version of #Atheism in our times.
+
Viewed from the lens of Chaturvidha-Purushartha (Dharma, Artha, Kama, Moksha) & see who stands where. There 5 Segments (respectfully used terms).
1. Left Liberal Seculars 2. Dharmic Athiests 3. Dharmic Artha Sarvopari-s 4. Dharmic Non-Literalists 5. Dharmic Literalists
+
1. Left Liberal Seculars (A wide spectrum collapsed into one)
- Moksha is hoax for them
- Dharma ranges from being a good idea to a hoax but not a reality
- (Excessive) Kama is Supreme and (Myopic) Artha must serve that purpose
- Panchendriya and Arishadvarga reign supreme
Historically, Politically, Symbolically, Culturally - most importantly from the Sacred Energy stand-point this must stand out as a top story of our times.
Much more than a story.
+
Firstly, Naman to C Rajagopalachari. His Vision, Civilizational Clarity, Thoughtfulness, use of opportunity saved the day.
He almost played the role of Sage Narada - guiding Prahlada while in the womb of Kayadu.
Thus a Bhakta was born to the Bhayakankara Hiranyakashipu.
+
2ndly, I wonder how Nehru even thought of asking Rajaji. Why he didnt ask his favourite guides & voila - a Mughalo-Buddhist Tradition would have been woven.
Saraswatee Devi sat on the tongue of Kumbhakarna & made him ask something totally opposite.
A short thread on the impact of #Avarana novel of SL Bhairappa in Kannada.
Published in the year 2007 it immediately created a huge wave, became a significant turning point in Kannada literature.
Never expected it’s national impact, but over many years, much later - it did.
+
To understand this - lets step into the literary history of Karnataka.
1880-1960 - Navodaya (Culturally Rooted)
1960-1980 - Navya (Modern, Western Influence)
1970-2000 - Left Wing, Bandaya & Dalit (The Rebellion)
1 & 2 were literary/cultural. 3 was literary/political.
+
Navodaya never died. It continued to flow like River Saraswatee. Its impact on the society was the greatest. It simply did not have as many stalwarts as it did in the 1880-1960 period.
SLB cannot be considered as Navodaya but he took on their legacy in a different direction.