Minister Taylor talking up Australian emissions which, to reiterate, are not coming down because we have no climate policy. Meanwhile Australia is the world's third largest fossil fuel exporter.
Claim Australia is world best on renewables installation is just not true even on the govts own data sources. Boom bust caused by govt policy chaos. tai.org.au/content/rank-h…
BREAKING: Minister Taylor to recant word "technology" until emissions come down.
Taylor announces a storage goal of $100/MWh.
He wants storage to be much cheaper than gas. Why?
Meeting that goal is great, except transition will be held hostage to this very stringent goal.
Minister says gas doesn't need subsidy. Also, plans to give massive subsidies to gas.
Minister claims 250mt reduction in emissions but still no details. Maybe, like last time, it is "simply department judgement" ie thought bubbles without analysis reneweconomy.com.au/federal-govern…
Minister talks about international engagement. We've done this before. Like the Howard and Bush 'technology not taxes' distraction. It achieved nothing.
Minister Taylor completely dismisses Price Charles call for a Green Marshall Plan to Avery global catastrophe
Australia by 2030 will on current policies have about the same emissions as today. #npc on current govt projections
If only there was some proven technology industry wanted to invest in that we could accelerate now to reduce emissions.
Minister Taylor praising the brown coal to hydrogen project in the Latrobe. Hideously expensive and polluting,
How did you choose your technologies?
Ministerial word salad.
Look I would love Australia to meet all of these targets. But saying you love these goals //is not a policy//.
Claims Australian renewables investment is unprecedented is simply FALSE.
$18 bn over what, 20 years? Ten? This is not the RDD budget of a serious technology program
#NPC Australia has never been first on per capita renewables investment
Minister Taylor says the 250mt emissions reduction figure includes export displacement. Yet we don't take responsibility for being third biggest fossil fuel exporter. #npc
Export coal? Not our problem. Export gas or hydrogen? Australia wants a gold star.
Minister Taylor asked how you get costs down, this being the entire point of the policy. He responds by saying the policy is to get the costs down.
This is high order farce.
Minister refuses to say Liveris and Nev Power won't personally benefit from their own pro gas advice.
"it's not something I'm personally focused on" - literally what the Minister said when asked about NCCC conflicts of interest
Angus Taylor reckons CCS is proven. Which is why we've spent so much on it and are still miles behind where all agencies say it should be.
Why doesn't Australia adopt nuclear SMRs, being a technology that does not yet exist?
Taylor says large scale is expensive and SMRs to watch but at moment "not going to deliver"
A year and a half after the govt put gas executives in charge of the COVID Commission, and weeks after COP26, we have today a new national plan to subsidise gas pipelines across Australia.
From the exec summary "Gas supplies are likely to fall short of domestic ///and export/// demand by the end of the decade if further action to unlock supply and deliver key infrastructure is not taken by industry"
Ie - subsidies to prop up bad investments in export terminals
Notorious non tax paying Santos has made clear that its interest in the Beetaloo is focused on exports.
higher petrol prices must have people thinking more about EVs. does anyone know, or have a simple modelling tool, for how much petrol prices impact the payback period for EVs?
obviously depends on lots of things - better fuel economy of alternative means less impact, amount of kms driven means more impact, etc.
and whether you are using real time pricing or own supply solar to charge
Clearest explanation I've heard of what Doherty modelling actually says and doesn't say just now from ACT Chief Minister.
Will be months before thresholds met and even then, "Broad brush talk of 'open up' does not mean there will no public health response".
Also, crucially, we are not starting from where the modelling starts - it assumes no/ v low outbreaks, not current situation
All journalists covering covid response should watch the ACT pressers. Beyond the local matters, super clear explanation of the national situation, calling out misunderstandings without blaming others