i'm not an expert, obvs, but IMO referring to the possibility of male violence as "fantasy" multiple x in an argument seems a bit blind & demeaning. an est 6% of males are rapists, that's approx. 234mil worldwide. that's a lot of fantasies, & that's not including DV or common
assault or indeed the persistent occurrences of violent, degrading & sometimes life-threatening messages that women who don't conform to an ideology/dogma receive daily. & since rapists, abusers & misogynists usually don't have a note on their forehead claiming as such, it's
one of the female burdens to be wary of all male bodied people. if Judith Butler wants to term this fantasy, then surely it's a fantasy borne from reality & one that does its best to keep women alive & safe. to condescend that is not constructive or empathetic.
there are too many women in the world who can't identify out of the violence & abuse & degradation meted out to them due to their biological sex.
also, claiming complete ignorance on the weaponisation of a well known & legally adjudicated slur seems incredibly disingenuous. the majority of those who use the term do so with very specific intent. terfisaslur.com
to claim the innocence of the term based upon it's etymology is patronising. the N-word also had an "innocent" etymology weaponised by hate. yet no one would dare argue as such or downplay the significance of the slur, & if they did there's a very clear definition for that.
ofc, this is only my conclusion so i'll defer to someone much smarter than me & someone with much more at stake than me, @janeclarejones, to break down the argument.
but, i would like to say that the acceptance, tolerance & support for a sustained, malicious effort to debase & intimidate women who don't agree w/the negation & dismissal of their shared female experience & the removal of sex based rights is dangerous. photos.app.goo.gl/z2cbyxLSMsGEjE…
the level of abuse @jk_rowling alone has received is incredible & she's in a much better position than many women to weather this storm; medium.com/@rebeccarc/j-k…
she has little fear of losing her job or being questioned by police for centering women. she has better protection from physical intimidation. so when i say #IStandWithJKRowling i mean that, but more importantly, i mean #IStandWithWomen.
& in regards to the right or wrong side of history, i believe that those who have sent, tolerated, encouraged or ignored truly abominable messages & intent, those who have physically attacked or intimidated women speaking on their rights,
or those who celebrate or revel in book burning are on a side that i don't want any part of. the dogmatic aggressor & the book burner are never on the right side of anything.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Zionism is simple; the belief that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland. It’s a moot question answered over 80 years ago. Israel exists.
Anti-Zionism is NOT about criticising Israeli policies or military tactics, it’s not about excoriating Bibi as a criminal or
highlighting how a racist Otzma Yehudit party was brought into government. It’s about delegitimisation through demonisation, in order to eliminate, in one way or another, the only democratic state in the Middle East. The only state in the Middle East where Muslims enjoy full
Recently @JohnSimpsonNews wrote about when he went to cover the trial of Klaus Barbie, the Butcher of Lyon. He was interviewing a man Barbie had arrested and he asked ‘How did Barbie know about you?’ ‘My neighbour betrayed me.’ ‘What happened to him?’
‘He’s still my neighbour.’
50 years later, and the neighbour was still listening in from his garden and only ran inside when they turned the camera on him.
In the last week, I've been appalled to see just how many "neighbours" there are in Ireland, the UK, the US, Australia, France, Germany, and all across the West.
I still think about the large number of QTs on the @NWCI's thread about the dangers of prostitution from self described leftists railing against the demonisation of sex work. There were absolutely excoriating and severe in their denouncements of the NWCI and their abandonment
of the "true" feminist ideals; the ideals that "TWAW and Sex Work is Work," both an affirmation and catechism requiring a suspense of reality, and they were tarred with the bigot brush.
The NWCI, the same group who penned and signed a letter with @AmnestyIreland calling on the Media and Politicians to deny legitimate representation to those in Ireland-mostly women-with a belief in biology, and concerns and/or objections to the GRA and Self-Id.
The idea of diversity is negated when thoughts aren’t allowed to differ. Inclusion can never be achieved when societal discussions that should be broad in orientation & scope are replaced with those that are narrow. Inclusion does not mean open; it means involvement, engagement.
It's hard work because true inclusion requires the greatest effort to be as right for everyone as possible. It requires dialogue, examination, debate, fact, convincing. It requires the kindness that Conor so woefully and lazily misplaces here.
It also requires humanity. & I think humanity is less about having empathy for those with whom you agree, but rather having empathy for those with whom you disagree. It also requires a grounding in empathy and reality to realise that the kindest thing to possibly say is that:
They have no escape anymore; in sports, in school, in the spaces in life that they had to fight to carve out for themselves in order to give them places of safety, opportunity and confidence. They are constantly facing social pressures to conform to a hypersexualised
version of femininity in an abuse-porn addled age, where boys & Social Media are placing impossible expectations on them while telling them that they're not enough, or that they should be more. Or that their merit as a human being is determined by their compliance.
A great indicator of the moral or ethical veracity of an idea or movement is in how it deals with those who disagree. 🧵
Classic Liberalism cherishes diversity of thought. Differing voices are important in order to do the hard work of building a common world in which we can live together amidst our real and important differences. It values rationalism, reason and science. It seeks to uplift.
It is democratic and loving. Diversity of thought is Classic Liberalism's strength. Protest is peaceful, non violence is absolutely necessary, because true and lasting success lay in strength of ideas and in the power of words to effect change in order to improve the world.