Apparently, she went back to negotiate the termination clause.
The company had a policy that termination or resignation required 4-weeks notice with no payment-in-lieu.
She didn't like it. It limits her flexibility to switch to a new job if such an opportunity comes.
They agreed to give her a waiver because they desperately needed her.
The company now agreed to amend the clause to say that both parties could terminate the employment contract with one week notice or payment in lieu. The updated employment letter was signed.
She was happy. She got what she wanted. She thanked one of her mentors and motivational speaker who she listens to regularly. He had encouraged people to ask for what they want. She did and she got it.
Fast forward to 8 months later. Business has been very bad and her division has not been meeting their targets. The BOD met and asked the MD to reorganize and rightsize the various divisions.
Yes - she was the first on the list. They gave her the August salary plus one week salary in lieu of notice.
She was angry and hurt.
She had thought the amendment that was made (and she signed) was only for her to be able to resign with the 1 week notice. She thought the company would still be required to give her 4 weeks notice.
Unfortunately, in the spirit of fairness and equity, unless specifically structured differently, exit and termination clauses are usually structured to treat both parties equally.
What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.
So, technically, the game was over.
But, I don't give up on my community members (even though we've never met before). I decided to chat with one of my friends on the BOD of that company.
The response was heart breaking.
My mentee (I can't disown her) was actually leading a group of junior employees to demand a salary increase during the peak of the pandemic in May/June despite knowing that the company struggled to pay the FULL salaries of all employees with ZERO revenue.
The game is over.
She just lacked emotional intelligence although she is very smart, brilliant and technically strong. Believe me, she is a great person.
Learn from Janet's experience and consciously work on your emotional intelligence. She is working on it too.
On education, the FGN needs to grant full autonomy to the schools, issue clear KPIs (admission, teaching, research, infrastructure quality, graduates’ placement rates), and then regulate.
Let me attempt to answer @ItsChristy__ ‘s question 😁
Thanks Prof @yomitheprof for this article. While your conclusions are not aligned with my views on this topic, I believe that most of the arguments are logical and fair.
I believe that some of the issues raised should drive the discussion for the first amendment to #CAMA2020 😁
Yomi’s article is actually the best non pro-CAMA article that I have seen - it came with strong logic that is devoid of unnecessary emotions and sentiments.
Let me just share my thoughts on some of the issues raised.
I have gotten a few messages assuming that I was part of the @officialNESG team that developed the 15-paragraph publication on the matters that require urgent attention.
While I fully endorse ALL the points raised in that publication, I am not a member of NESG.
Apparently because of my comments on social media and in 3 online events during the week, some of my friends believed that I was too sympathetic to the @officialNESG publication and that I must have been part of it.
Technically, they have classified me as a #Wailing Nigerians🤣
I love NESG’s objectives and I have
made three UNSUCCESSFUL attempts in the past to join @officialNESG but they have other priorities.
MAYBE they prefer people with titles like MD/GCEO as prospective members.🤣🤣🤣.