Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
@VaBlackCaucus is split on A1, w/ Senate (mostly?) for and House all against. Why the divide? Not sure, maybe because Senators involved in drafting? Maybe just generational difference?
4/
Maybe it comes down to trust. Younger Black Dems are being told to put faith in a process that cuts them out and put power in the hands of (white) GOP leaders countering (mostly white) Dem leaders, with (mostly white) judges as a backstop 5/
In 2020, the year of #GeorgeFloyd & #BLM (& lukewarm response to protest from Dem leaders), plus after years of their experience, I can understand Black Dems not wanting to put power in hands of Cox & Gilbert, even EFC & Saslaw
6/
Worries about courts may be overblown. (@fairmapsva reminds me: courts don't gerrymander, and legislatures always do.) Same w/ worries about minority voters (commission OR GA still have to deal with gutted #CivilRightsAct)
7/
But bottom line: take your chances with bipartisan process with a big voice for the GOP and VASupes (& stuck in constitution, so hard to change), or take your chances with the legislative Dems following through on commitments, which they have to do anyway on enabling leg? 8/
Who do you think will do the most damage? In this country/state at this point in history, my $$ is on keeping veto power out of minority party hands, esp. THIS minority party, and esp. when state constitution is involved. That's why I'm still out
9/End #VoteNoOn1
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…
Stoney's tenure has been a roller coaster of ups and downs. Before #GeorgeFloyd, it seemed the failed #NavyHill development would be the albatross that possibly ended his career. But the #BLM protests have made his re-election prospects even trickier
2/
A lot of folks, largely conservatives and property owners, oppose protests by default. They don't understand them, & rely on media and authorities who continue to refer to "violence" and "looters" to de-legitimize any political claims that animate them
3/