Someone wrote that Judge Amy Coney Barrett would bring “heart” to ‘special needs’ if confirmed to the #SupremeCourt. After showing my respect for the person who wrote that, and understanding of where they were coming from, this was my response:
“Disabled people don’t need lawmakers or jurors to bring “heart” to ‘special needs’. That’s what has led to patronizing policy which has f%¥ked over the exercise of our equality and marginalized our full participation in society over-and-over-and-over again...
It’s one of the greatest things we organize and fight against and we will continue to fight against it until the law and policy makers recognize that we are just like everyone else...
We deserve as much “heart” applied to policy and legal considerations about us as is deserved by the agricultural industry, light marine craft manufacturers, creators of intellectual property, middle class tax payers, long haul truckers, or tobacco lobbyists...
The law should treat us like anyone else. To quote James Baldwin “we are also mercenaries, dictators, liars - alas, we are human too.”
Yet our policy around disability, and in particular intellectual disability, continues to treat disabled people as ‘other’...
It’s why most “disability” groups are run and controlled by non-disabled people who insist that disabled people are not worthy to center the issues about us around our viewpoints, our leadership, our needs...
It’s these organizations who have the funds to influence our policy makers and our courts. And to excuse their behavior, and to obscure our marginalization, these groups present their policy through the frames of “kindness” and “heart”...
Res flags are raised whenever disabled people see language like “heart”. We do not want ‘heart’ from our jurors or legislators. We want equal extension and application of the law...
I’ve hoped that I’ve written the above in a way that conveys that this is not a personal attack on you. But, even if I’ve failed to do so, and people think lesser of me, it’s important to remember that disabled people can be assholes too.”
[End of Thread]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The whole #BobWoodward thing reminds me that our better politicians understand the press will try to ‘get’ them, and that’s a good, healthy thing for our democracy. They respect and welcome that.
—> It’s a BS check.
Bad politicians think the press is there to serve them.
*I should say it’s not as much that the press tries to “get” politicians, but that they don’t regard a politician’s messaging priorities when they are reporting stories. That’s an amazing thing, and when I was a press officer it drove me up the wall.
I hated it, but I loved it.
And the #BobWoodward tapes remind me of #LouChibarro of the @WashBlade. When I was a press officer, he was so masterful in asking a question, letting you answer, then NOT SAYING ANYTHING.
The subject felt compelled to fill the silence with more information.
👨🍳💋
So, while I very much *feel* #SpoonTheory in my being, it all falls apart when trying to use it as a metaphor with others (or as an accommodation strategy for myself). I constantly miscount and lose them.
When speaking, or in meetings, I’m often asked by folks to explain spoon theory. I usually just turn to someone I trust and ask “Could you explain it?”
For myself, I’ve learned to just make myself stop, slow down, or turn down requests when needed — and to be ok with that.
I mean, I’m a huge supporter of spoon theory as a metaphor to explain things to others and as an accomodation peoole can use themselves. It just all gets tangled and anxiety-inducing for me.
I love to laugh at that, though. You kind of gotta.
I often think on how research, medicine, and psychiatry approach and ‘treat’ autistic people today in the exact same manner they approached and ‘treated’ homosexuality until 1972.
Then, thanks to #LGBTQ advocates, homosexuality was suddenly ‘cured’ by @APAPsychiatric overnight.
Where are the endless research papers about the genetics and epigenetics of gay people?
Where are the warnings of “risk factors” for lesbians?
Where’s the pleading for “early intervention” for bisexuals?
What about environmental factors?!?!
We probably know less about gay people now than autistic people. But, we know enough not to funnel everything about LGBTQ people through a pathological frame.
All the questions we ask about autism are still there (and largely unanswered) for LGBTQ people.
I just watched a @GeographyNow segment on Sierra Leone & it seems like such an amazing place.
My neighbor for 15 years in DC was the Sierra Leonean embassy & I regularly ate at a Sierra Leonean cafe, but didn’t know much else. It’s now a place I’d desperately love to go.
And that smiling man in the third picture in my original tweet is Bubu (a genre of music I’ve been introduced to and listening to this morning thanks to @GeographyNow) musician #JankaNabay.