Do you like shrooms? 🍄 If yes, read on (thread):

My paper Mycological Rationality was published in Judgment and Decision Making.

How do #mushroom foragers make safe decisions? I study decision-making, heuristics & perception with 894 Finnish foragers.

journal.sjdm.org/20/200330/jdm2… Image
Some context for this study: Lots of decision-making research is very abstract, and there's actually relatively little research on decision-making "in the wild".

Turns out mushroom foraging is quite an interesting case for studying decision-making and its cultural evolution.
This is not the least because even one mistake when foraging may kill you. Deadly species are abundant, and edible species can have poisonous lookalikes.

E.g., Amanita virosa, the "destroying angel" (below), can look similar to champignons and grows abundantly in Finland. Image
Naturally then, mushroom foraging happens under great *uncertainty*. Research in ecological rationality has suggested that in such environments, people can often resort to relatively simple ("fast and frugal") heuristics. My study gives some flesh to these claims (with caveats).
The foragers I studied reported using several such heuristics. Some infer edibility from "white milk" that bleeds from milk-caps (Lactarius, below); others totally avoid all white mushrooms (because of A. virosa, above). Foragers also associate specific trees with mushrooms. Image
Better safe than sorry: Foragers seem to *avoid taking calculated risks*, and instead Finnish foraging cultures have evolved heuristic precautionary principles to put strict bounds on uncertainty (e.g., "don't pick ANY unrecognised mushrooms"). Very practical risk management.
But heuristics alone don't always suffice. The study also illustrates how many foragers use intuitive pattern recognition and more complex cognitive rules in tandem with simple heuristics, and includes various thoughts on the development of selective perception.
There's plenty to speculate here re. the cultural evolution of foraging societies. When and how did these precautionary heuristics evolve? I can date some to at least 1863. Do other foraging societies (or did early hunter-gatherers) use heuristics similarly?
Some foragers also reported rather... *ahem*... unique, mnemonics to aid in decision-making (picture of C. caperatus for reference): ImageImage
All in all, I think it made for a fun study on decision-making in the fuzzy and uncertain real-world. And foragers were such a fun group to engage with! You'll find my earlier writings on the topic here for @TheSideViewCo:

thesideview.co/journal/the-ar…
I find this line of research quite promising. It’s specifically the kind of cultural, human-scale research on cognition and perception I enjoy the most.

Also, lots of shroom photos in the article (it's a new hobby of mine).

Happy to hear your thoughts, as always! Image
Finally, a little plug for the journal: JDM is an Open Access journal with no publishing fees. As if that's not enough, this was the most constructive editorial/review process I've been through. Big thanks to editor Jon Baron and reviewers. Full issue:

journal.sjdm.org/vol15.5.html

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roope Kaaronen

Roope Kaaronen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RoopeKaaronen

9 Oct
This is a great intervention, but...

*could we please stop calling basic improvements in design and communication "nudges"*? Why are all behaviour interventions nudges these days? What's the added value of "nudge"?

Let me explain my position:
"Nudge" is a misguided book by Thaler & Sunstein, who claim that because of very basic inherent biases in human cognition and perception, we need essentially covert and paternalistic governance to keep us in line.

Thing is, we really aren't that biased:

pure.mpg.de/rest/items/ite…
Calling basic improvement in design or communications reinforces the idea that we need governmental paternalism to keep us functional. But, e.g., in the intervention above, the problem wasn't "human bias" at all, but VERY poor communication & design from centralised authorities.
Read 6 tweets
10 Aug 18
Conceptual mapping for an Ecology of Human Behaviour, with Open Access references: (Thread, 1/N)
1. Niche Construction [Modifying and designing environmental states in non-random ways]
link.springer.com/article/10.100… (2/N)
2. Ecological Information [Set of structures and regularities in the environment that allow an animal to engage with affordances]
link.springer.com/article/10.100… (3/N)
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!