Thread by @PandemicTruther

Breaking: Case study of scandalous lack of journalistic integrity.

More subterfuge discovered in the Minnesota student freedom of speech violation story. The tweet cited in Ms. BAE's article alleged to be the object of the six months' prison sentence is irrelevant,

https://twitter.com/PandemicTruther/status/1312780453406019586

2/ not targeted in the court judgement! In the judgement, Mr. Luo the culprit acknowledged to have created (usurped) three accounts in Chinese called Mian Qing (绵青), Maxx(马某，True name of the cartoonist, usurped identity), and "Feet Washing Basin". Nowhere did the

3/ judgement mention the account "l'étranger1111" cited in Ms. BAE's article.

In the judgement, Mr. Luo confirmed
that he has since deleted the 40s tweets being targeted. Whereas the tweet cited in the BAE article is still valid on Twitter. So the cited tweet is totally

4/ irrelevant to the court judgement.
The public is misled into thinking that the tweet cited is the cause of the punishment whereas in reality it's unrelated.
Moreover the opposite is true. Such content can be freely published in China!
Author of the cited tweet confirms
such

5/ cartoons can be published without any problem in China, as per the cartoon caption "Collected some Limburger pictures to be used inside the fire wall".

This is further confirmed by a comment which says, "Very easy to use (inside the wall). Filed. Published inside the

6/ country without problem. Effect is good"

Ms. BAE is bullying her readers who don't understand Chinese into thinking that a boy went to prison for six months for publishing the mild satire whereas the reality is exactly the opposite.

7/ This is flagrant subterfuge and falsehood.

Everything is false/misrepresentation in Ms. BAE's article.

To summarize, the news article just pulled out part of the judgement which suits the propaganda narrative and purpose while totally

8/ignoring the part which is not convenient to fit into the propaganda narrative, ie, the part on internet mob violence. The victim Mr. Ma clearly stated that he was the object of Internet mob harassment and Mr. Luo clearly acknowledged that he did this on behalf of the

9/mob to exact vengeance on Mr. Ma.

Mr. Luo admitted that the motive for publishing his tweets was to harass Mr. Ma (Is harassment freedom of expression? 😂).

Judging from the fact that later Mr. Ma was hounded by the pro-democracy activists who exposed his personal

10/ information online, he was most probably apolitical and published the tweets to settle accounts more than anything else. Ms. BAE seems to have ignored this most crucial information in the judgement. Moreover, to make her propaganda piece more convincing, she didn't hesitate

11/ to add false information to deliberately mislead the public. The false information happens to demonstrate the opposite. This is equivalent of prisoners who digged a tunnel to escape but found themselves in the court room😂! The cited cartoon precisely proved China's Internet

12/freedom not the opposite!

Lo and behold, a case of China's dictatorship escalating the onslaught on freedom of speech abroad is thus created. I am flabbergasted.

I invited Ms. BAE to do a full translation of the judgement. She said translation is not her job.

13/ Since when is giving a full exact account of a story not the job of a journalist? She invited me to do it. Here I am, doing the investigative journalism on her behalf, giving you the crucial information. For the complete story, please see my embedded thread.

14/ In case Ms. BAE deletes or changes her bogus cited tweet, I attach a screenshot here. Notice she has cropped away the caption In Chinese. She is fully aware what the caption says. Not very convenient, eliminated.. Story of China jailing people for mild satire thus fabricated

15/ Ms. BAE also mentioned in her article that Mr. Luo retweeted an image of Winnie the Pooh, giving the impression that Mr Luo went to prison for Winnie the Pooh. First of all, president Xi Jinping represents the dignity and authority of the country. Personal ridicule and

16/ debasement are outlawed in China, towards all citizens including and especially towards government leaders. That is a good law. Given the viciousness of the US/West against China, no such law means CIA/NED are free to run propaganda campaigns with monstrous lies to

17/erode the authority of the government and bring about a regime change.
Personal attack is not freedom of expression. Even Twitter suspends accounts engaging in personal insults.

However, this time Ms. BAE didn't give a screenshot of the so-called Winnie the Pooh image

18/ from the account of the Taiwan separatist. Why, because the image is a far cry from the lovely disneyland image. It's disgusting and is clearly a personal debasement of a vile nature. Since such true image is not very convenient to the story of the martyr of

19/ freedom of expression, Ms BAE omitted the screenshot.
Well by exaggeration, omission, truncating, pulling some information forward, sweeping some under the carpet, sparkled with false misleading information here and there, she accomplished the sleight of hand of a

20/ case of drastic violation of freedom of speech by a dictatorship. That's a propaganda lie, not serious journalism.

@bbcchinese @BBCWorld @cnni @dw_chinese @guardian @HuXijin_GT @ABC @Reuters @Russ_Warrior @RT_com @lemondefr @chenweihua @ChinaDaily @afpfr @MahuiChina @1maria_ml @Tom_Fowdy @LaStampa @NouvelObserv @AbangC2 @Independent @caitoz