For years we have worked ourselves into ill-health, forsaking our families each weekend and late into the evening, for free, to keep the criminal justice system hanging together. Because @BorisJohnson’s party has destroyed justice and we, unlike some, feel a sense of public duty.
We have sat with distraught victims of the most serious crimes, having to apologetically explain that there is no justice for them, because @BorisJohnson and his pals have slashed the court budgets, the police, the CPS, probation - every part of the system. We pick up the pieces.
We have watched as the waiting list for justice has grown from months to YEARS. We watch guilty people game the system and innocent people trapped in a neverending hell
Because @BorisJohnson refuses to fund the courts, and prefers to make #FakeLaw boasts about “tough sentences”.
Today, if you are falsely accused of a crime and then found not guilty, you can be bankrupted. The state can refuse you legal aid and refuse to pay for your private legal fees.
Our prisons as they currently function serve only one purpose - to make damaged people worse.
Overcrowded hovels of self-harm, violence and death. There is no rehabilitation and no redemption. Because @BorisJohnson cares only about filling the prisons. Not making us safer.
Meanwhile, criminal barristers and solicitors toil 80-hour weeks for pay that can fall below minimum wage, as we are painted as fat cats by the porkiest moggies ever stuffed around a Cabinet table.
We don’t ask for sympathy. We just do our jobs, upholding the rule of law.
So I agree with @BorisJohnson - the criminal justice system is hamstrung.
But not by us.
Not by the people turning up every day to prosecute and defend criminal cases, in the face of impossible odds.
I want to tell you about a criminal case I’ve been contacted about.
It’s not pleasant, but in light of @BorisJohnson’s comments yesterday, I think it’s important.
It’s not one of my cases, but it’s v similar to many I prosecute. It involves serious allegations of rape. [THREAD]
In early 2017, Annie, made a report of serious sexual offences to the police.
Two years later, in 2019, the case reached the Crown Court.
Why the delay?
Because @BorisJohnson’s party cut funding to the police and CPS, causing a logjam in police investigations.
This is sadly commonplace. In fact, this case is one of the lucky ones. Many cases I deal with - especially involving sexual allegations - go back to pre-2017, because the police simply don’t have the resources to progress investigations any quicker.
The Mail on Sunday is pushing some vintage #FakeLaw today, with a classic reheating of some #LegalAidLies in the ongoing war on asylum seekers.
Let’s take a brief look. [THREAD]
The “scoop” is that a law firm, Duncan Lewis Solicitors, has been paid £55million in legal aid over the past three years.
Part of their work involves representing asylum seekers.
Hence the headline of “£55m for lawyer blocking deportation flights”.
But look closer.
Firstly, despite the focus in the article on the founder, this is a huge solicitors’ firm with over 800 staff and offices across the country. The headline “£55million for lawyer” implies that this sum went to one individual. It of course did not.
Some Sunday morning #FakeLaw to deconstruct, courtesy of our regular guest star, The Sun.
Buckle up, kids [THREAD]
1. Firstly, this man did not “spend £165,000”. That is a lie. This was the overall cost of legal aid in long-running serious criminal proceedings. This is like saying someone who receives a NHS heart transplant is “spends” the cost of the operation. It’s nonsensical.
2. In any case, readers are invited to conclude that £165,000 is too much to spend on this case.
But the journalist has not bothered to tell you any of the context that you would need to even *begin* to assess whether that cost is too high, too low, or about right. Such as...
.@BorisJohnson has refused point blank to resource the courts. His government has cut court capacity, causing a backlog of over half a million cases.
When Covid hit and made things even worse, @BorisJohnson still refused to make money available to assist the courts.
There is now typically a delay of 2 to 3 years between a crime being reported and a case coming to trial. In that time, witnesses’ memories fade. Many lose faith and disappear. So cases collapse.
If I were a guilty criminal, I would raise a toast to @BorisJohnson every day.
Justice truly done means people not being forced to wait years for trials due to the government’s long-term refusal to resource the courts, which has caused a huge backlog (that they are falsely trying to blame on Covid). lawgazette.co.uk/news/new-figur…
Justice truly done means abolishing the Innocence Tax, by which the government refuses you legal aid, forces you to pay privately for your legal defence team and then, when you’re acquitted, refuses to reimburse you, leaving you penniless. thetimes.co.uk/article/ditch-…
There’s some odd jubilation in some quarters about the Attorney General citing the Miller judgment in her statement attempting to justify breaching international law.
Unfortunately, like the statement itself, the reference to Miller is legally meaningless.
Miller confirms the long-established principle that Parliament is sovereign, but that is not in doubt. Nobody disputes that, as a matter of domestic law, Parliament has the power to legislate contrary to international law.
But we would still be in breach of international law.
Miller is wholly irrelevant to that argument. It does not provide a defence nor a justification for breaching international law.
By citing it, the Attorney General is trying to distract and manipulate those who don’t understand the law.