I want to tell you about a criminal case I’ve been contacted about.

It’s not pleasant, but in light of @BorisJohnson’s comments yesterday, I think it’s important.

It’s not one of my cases, but it’s v similar to many I prosecute. It involves serious allegations of rape. [THREAD]
In early 2017, Annie, made a report of serious sexual offences to the police.

Two years later, in 2019, the case reached the Crown Court.

Why the delay?

Because @BorisJohnson’s party cut funding to the police and CPS, causing a logjam in police investigations.
This is sadly commonplace. In fact, this case is one of the lucky ones. Many cases I deal with - especially involving sexual allegations - go back to pre-2017, because the police simply don’t have the resources to progress investigations any quicker.

But anyway, back to 2019.
The trial joined a Crown Court backlog of 30,000 cases.

Why?

Because the government slashed funds to the courts, restricting the number of cases that courts were allowed to hear.

This backlog soared in 2019 to nearly 40,000.

[Note the date - nothing to do with Covid.]
So Annie’s trial was listed in September 2019.

But because of these cuts by @BorisJohnson’s party, the court wasn’t allowed to hear the trial.

There were enough courtrooms. Enough judges. The case was ready.

But the govt said no. So at the last minute the trial was adjourned.
The trial was adjourned to April 2020. But the backlog was only getting longer. Because even though lawyers were begging the government to stop the cuts, to open up the courtrooms and resource the system, @BorisJohnson refused.

And then along came Covid.
When Covid hit in March 2020, it was obvious that jury trials in the Crown Courts couldn’t continue as before.

Large venues were needed for socially-distanced juries. Theatres, cinemas, sports halls. The huge courts that the government had recently sold off to make a cheap buck.
What did @BorisJohnson’s government do?

Nothing.

Like Trump, it pretended the problem didn’t exist.

And the Court backlog grew even longer.

Lawyers begged the government to pay for more courts and alternative venues to open.

@BorisJohnson refused to make money available.
So suddenly serious sex trials like Annie’s found themselves without a venue to be tried. Annie’s trial went off again - to Autumn.

Across the country, people were forced to wait even longer for their trials.

But still @BorisJohnson refused to fund the criminal courts.
The trial was due to take place last month. Can you guess what happened?

Having prepared herself for the third time, Annie was told, the night before, that the trial could not go ahead.

Off to 2021. A fourth trial. Four years after she reported the allegation to the police.
.@BorisJohnson did find money for some things in criminal justice though.

He found money to fund extra prison places so he and @pritipatel could posture in the tabloids about “longer sentences”.

Never mind that we couldn’t even run a trial. “Tough sentences” were what mattered.
.@BorisJohnson also found time and money to change the law to increase the time that accused people could lawfully be held in custody awaiting trial. Just to relieve the pressure on the government to actually deal with the backlog.
In the meantime, criminal justice ground to a standstill. The people involved - real, breathing, bleeding, pained and desperate people - were ignored, their trials kicked into 2021, even 2022 in some areas of the country.

Still the government wouldn’t act.
So when I hear @BorisJohnson claim that the problems in criminal justice are the fault of us - the lawyers who have been working, without pay (we earn our money doing trials - no trials since March = no pay since March) to keep the show on the road - it makes me quite cross.
Because the truth is that the problems in criminal justice were all caused by politicians, not lawyers.

And @BorisJohnson has made them all far, far worse. While the “do-gooder” lawyers have been the ones speaking up for the people affected.

It didn’t have to be this way.
Faced with the growing court backlog, @BorisJohnson could have taken the problem seriously. He could have funded the courts to run at full capacity (typically he would run them at 1/3 to 1/2 capacity to cut costs)

When Covid hit, he could have opened Nightingale Courts.

But no.
Because the evidence is that @BorisJohnson doesn’t care about victims of sexual violence. Or victims of any crime. Or people accused of crime. Or witnesses. Or the public whose safety depends on functioning criminal justice

His only interest in justice is getting cheap headlines
Given the choice between a properly resourced justice system that gives complainants and defendants timely justice, and cutting the system to the bone and covering it up by blaming Covid and bleating in The Sun about “tough sentences”, it was obvious what @BorisJohnson would do.
#TheLawIsBroken.

But we didn’t break it.

Complainants like Annie are being denied justice by @BorisJohnson. He, and governments before him, have slashed criminal justice to the bone. He now openly lies to the public to deflect from this.

Don’t let him get away with it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Secret Barrister

The Secret Barrister Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarristerSecret

8 Oct
Tonight I shall be hamstringing the criminal justice system by working late on a serious case involving allegations of domestic violence. The file from the police is a shambles, but I will painstakingly do the jobs of both the police & CPS, and put this case together. For free.
For free? you might ask. Yes, for free. The hours, probably days, it will take me as prosecuting counsel to fix this case and advise on what needs doing - I don’t receive a penny for. If (as is common) the trial is moved by the court to a date I can’t do, I won’t be paid a thing.
This is how we hamstringing left-wing activists like to really stick two fingers up at the system. By working for hours on end, for free, to try to plug the gaps in the system created by @BorisJohnson and co, and try to ensure that people get justice.
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
In 2018 I published a book on how politicians have broken our criminal justice system.

In 2020 I published a book on how politicians lie to us about the law.

Still didn’t foresee this. The PM blaming us - the ones keeping the system running - for the state of criminal justice.
For years we have worked ourselves into ill-health, forsaking our families each weekend and late into the evening, for free, to keep the criminal justice system hanging together. Because @BorisJohnson’s party has destroyed justice and we, unlike some, feel a sense of public duty.
We have sat with distraught victims of the most serious crimes, having to apologetically explain that there is no justice for them, because @BorisJohnson and his pals have slashed the court budgets, the police, the CPS, probation - every part of the system. We pick up the pieces.
Read 8 tweets
4 Oct
Gather round, children.

The Mail on Sunday is pushing some vintage #FakeLaw today, with a classic reheating of some #LegalAidLies in the ongoing war on asylum seekers.

Let’s take a brief look. [THREAD]
The “scoop” is that a law firm, Duncan Lewis Solicitors, has been paid £55million in legal aid over the past three years.

Part of their work involves representing asylum seekers.

Hence the headline of “£55m for lawyer blocking deportation flights”.

But look closer.
Firstly, despite the focus in the article on the founder, this is a huge solicitors’ firm with over 800 staff and offices across the country. The headline “£55million for lawyer” implies that this sum went to one individual. It of course did not.

Lie number one.
Read 13 tweets
27 Sep
Some Sunday morning #FakeLaw to deconstruct, courtesy of our regular guest star, The Sun.

Buckle up, kids [THREAD]
1. Firstly, this man did not “spend £165,000”. That is a lie. This was the overall cost of legal aid in long-running serious criminal proceedings. This is like saying someone who receives a NHS heart transplant is “spends” the cost of the operation. It’s nonsensical.
2. In any case, readers are invited to conclude that £165,000 is too much to spend on this case.

But the journalist has not bothered to tell you any of the context that you would need to even *begin* to assess whether that cost is too high, too low, or about right. Such as...
Read 19 tweets
15 Sep
I prosecute and defend the most dangerous criminals. I speak daily with victims of crime.

And I can tell you that there has never been as good a time to be a criminal as under @BorisJohnson’s government.
.@BorisJohnson has refused point blank to resource the courts. His government has cut court capacity, causing a backlog of over half a million cases.

When Covid hit and made things even worse, @BorisJohnson still refused to make money available to assist the courts.
There is now typically a delay of 2 to 3 years between a crime being reported and a case coming to trial. In that time, witnesses’ memories fade. Many lose faith and disappear. So cases collapse.

If I were a guilty criminal, I would raise a toast to @BorisJohnson every day.
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep
“Seeing justice truly done” is an interesting soundbite.

Is it, as this incoherent, sub-sixth-form essay rant suggests, only about locking more people up for longer?

Or does “justice truly done” mean a little more?

[THREAD]
Justice truly done means people not being forced to wait years for trials due to the government’s long-term refusal to resource the courts, which has caused a huge backlog (that they are falsely trying to blame on Covid). lawgazette.co.uk/news/new-figur…
Justice truly done means abolishing the Innocence Tax, by which the government refuses you legal aid, forces you to pay privately for your legal defence team and then, when you’re acquitted, refuses to reimburse you, leaving you penniless. thetimes.co.uk/article/ditch-…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!