Share this page!

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
Twitter logo
7 Oct, 4 tweets, 1 min read
What a get.
Are they trying to get me to vote for Biden twice?
Democrats plan to "flood America" with illegal immigrants and force police officers to choose between their jobs and enforcing unconstitutional laws. No not THOSE laws.
BYPASS CONGRESS FOR GUN CONTROL by allowing businesses to decide whether to sell guns.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Andrew Fleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ASFleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
7 Oct
Because news outlets are not always great at this, here is Sidney Powell's recusal motion.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Sidney Powell alleges that Judge Flynn should be recused because he said unflattering things about her client while he was sentencing him for a felony.

She alleges that he said these things because of Rachel Maddow, and not because of the facts before him.
Considering an amicus brief? That's a recusaling.
Read 29 tweets
Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
5 Oct
Contrary to Justice Thomas' thin-skinned complaint, it's not Obergefell that brands people opposed to gay marriage as bigots. That's the cultural shift that occurred when lots of young people came to accept gay marriage, and lots of older people died. /1 ImageImageImageImage
As for the argument that Kim Davis' religious liberty was threatened when a gay couple asked for a marriage license, I am skeptical that Justice Thomas would extend this anywhere else.

/2
Imagine, for instance, someone with a sincere religious objection to marrying people who had committed serious domestic violence.

That's a valid complaint, from a sincere place, and yet the Court would likely say it was none of that person's business. /3
Read 7 tweets
Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
26 Sep
I think it would be interesting to study, if SCOTUS overturns Roe and Casey, how many states have already declared fetuses to be persons, which would make abortion, or travel to get abortion, murder, with no statute of limitations.
Also interesting would be whether a law that is on the books, but unenforceable, may be applied retroactively if that law is declared constitutional.
If I were looking to point out the problems with forcing women to give birth, I think the purely discretionary enforcement of laws carrying mandatory life sentences would be a good thing to focus on.
Read 5 tweets
Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
24 Sep
The 11th circuit said the reason this was not a poll tax was because the fines were part of a felon's punishment. There's no rule against paying off someone else's fines, even if it incidentally means they can now vote.
And it's not an incentive to vote because the felon doesn't have to make any promises to get the fine paid.
Indeed there are some people in the world who might see millions of dollars being paid into court systems and victim's funds from out of state as a good thing.
Read 5 tweets
Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
23 Sep
First off, people aren't being that indirect about it. They're actively worried that Casey (not Roe) will be overturned, leading to the pervasive surveillance and incarceration of pregnant women.

But of course, you don't need to make abortion a crime to reduce it:
You can be powerfully anti-abortion in your faith while not believing that making it a crime is the best way to address the problem.

Indeed, stuff like ready access to contraception, prenatal care, and financial support for parents of young children is likely MORE effective.
The question isn't about whether we should adopt policies to reduce abortion--such policies are broadly popular in even the most progressive circles.

The question is whether we should punish women who seek abortions, and doctors who provide them.
Read 6 tweets
Andrew Fleischman Profile picture
22 Sep
You know, there was never a meaningful principle to keep Republicans from filling this slot. To people who strongly believe that abortion is murder and disrespect of police is dangerous, there's a moral imperative to enforce that view.
For the vast majority of this country's history, the Supreme Court has been a conservative institution, opposed to most things that liberals want. And yet, people still gained important freedoms.
So the next 30 years, minimum, will be spent on defense. Laws important to liberals will be struck down. But if folks can be half as galvanized by this change as conservatives were in the wake of Roe, this may create an issue, election after election, that makes people vote.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @ASFleischman