3/A lot of these loans are loans that Trump hasn't even paid back yet, using loopholes in the tax system to avoid paying taxes on those unpaid debts.
Why would creditors give money to a guy who wastes the money on bad businesses and doesn't even pay them back?
4/One seemingly obvious answer is that capital is just really cheap these days. Companies are able to borrow more easily than at any time in the last few decades.
5/But this presents us with a mystery.
Why hasn't an abundance of cheap capital caused the return on financial capital to fall? Interest rates are low, but stock returns have held up strongly.
6/Standard economic theory says this isn't supposed to happen.
When you increase the supply of loanable funds, prices are supposed to go down. In other words, cheap capital should fund a lot of marginal businesses that compete away profits...
7/But far from being competed away, profits have risen to unprecedented levels!!
8/Economists are starting to notice that capital markets aren't working like an Econ 101 textbook says they're supposed to work.
Simcha Barkai and Matt Rognlie have both written about this:
9/One possible explanation -- which Barkai prefers -- is that market power is growing in the economy. Meaning that big profitable quasi-monopolies are sucking up all the cheap capital, while all the little guys starve.
And it doesn't really explain Trump, does it? He's not a monopolist, and he doesn't even make profit. He's just a huckster who can borrow cheaply because he's famous.
11/An alternative idea is that capital is being RATIONED in the U.S., rather than priced.
Financiers are willing to throw tons of cheap money at big powerful companies or at famous hucksters like Trump, but charge inordinate prices to fund new entrants or marginal businesses.
12/If this is true, it means lots of perfectly good companies are probably struggling to get the capital they need, leaving the playing field to the big boys who can borrow cheaply. As a side effect, crappy borrowers like Trump waste some of our nation's savings.
13/Our financial system isn't working the way it's supposed to. Cheap capital should be reducing the return on financial capital, increasing business entry, and competing down profits.
We need to figure out what's going wrong, and fix it!
For example: The coefficient of relative risk aversion. If people don't have CRRA preferences, this isn't a structural parameter; it changes when risk changes. So if preferences aren't CRRA and you decide rho=2, you're going to run into problems...
Of course, the example everyone is thinking about is TFP. A certain Nobel-winning business cycle model (which shall remain nameless) famously assumed that the TFP residual is exogenous and follows an AR(1) process. That turned out to be wrong in any number of ways...
The % of people with no confidence in Xi Jinping is now over 70% in every country surveyed.
Japan (84%) and South Korea (83%) are the most negative on Xi.
Here's a longer-term picture.
Almost every country surveyed seems to have become more unfavorable towards China around 2012, when Xi took power. And then there was another big jump in unfavorability this year.
Housing only works as a sustainable wealth vehicle if you keep building more of it.
Building more housing creates actual real wealth.
Right now, the debate is between 3 factions: 1. YIMBYs: allow more private housing development 2. PHIMBYs: govt. constructs social housing and rents it to people 3. NIMBYs: do nothing, fuck the world
I want a fourth option: Govt. builds new housing and sells it cheaply.