Trump is having a difficult re-election campaign because he lacks ethos--credibility--in a way that he didn't in 2016. In 2016 a lot of Americans thought of Trump as a successful businessman who would run the nation like a business. Experience now shows he wasn't that guy.
Credibility is important in persuasion because people trust speakers who they believe are knowledgeable and who have good will in communicating what they know to the audience/electorate. Trump hasn't cared about his credibility.
You build credibility with an electorate--it's a long-term strategy of proving yourself to be a trustworthy source of information, with good intentions. You build credibility by providing useful & accurate information over time.
Trump's strategy has been to do the opposite. His is a short-term anti-credibility strategy. He only cares about winning the day. He wants to control the nation's agenda. He doesn't care about building a relationship. He just tells us "trust me" & punishes folks who question him.
It's a bizarre strategy for a president, but it's what you would expect from a demagogue.
"Flooding the zone with shit" or the "firehose of propaganda" model isn't a credibility building strategy. It's a strategy to avoid accountability. Guess what? credibility requires accountability. Bad luck for a demagogue (an unaccountable leader).
Because he lacks credibility he has to "win" the election by cheating, he can't win it by persuasion.
also, @brianstelter this ^^ reminds me of what you've been saying about Trump just trying to win the day--the long term consequences of that strategy aren't good for him.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wouldn’t normally share this, but I’m in such great company here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Leftists Call to Cancel Debates: They Are a 'Danger to Public Safety and a Direct Threat to Black Life' breitbart.com/politics/2020/…
ps: advocating for democratic norms is actually conservative.
2020 Plot-twist: the “leftists” are the conservatives and the “conservatives” are the radicals.
I feel a little bit of relief every time the world gets to see what a dangerous authoritarian Trump is because it confirms that I'm not the only one who sees it.
And, if you haven't read my essay on "weaponized communication" and dangerous demagogues like Trump, here it is (open access): oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/hand…
I explain all of this more fully in my book, available at your favorite local or in ereader, audio, or regular book form here: amazon.com/Demagogue-Pres…
1. Fact-check Trump (but not a lot) to show reality exists 2. Call him out for his fallacies to show the ways he cheats in debate 3. Laugh at him to throw him off
Trump typically uses aggressive debate cheats--things that would get someone disqualified from high school or collegiate debate. Two of the worst are ad hominem & ad baculum:
All "ad" fallacies are distraction techniques--"ad" means "to"--debaters seek to re-route our attention from the central issue of the debate and to the person of the opposition or to the threat made to intimidate. #Debates2020
In my book I explain that Trump's whole 2016 campaign hinged on his hero narrative: the story he told about his heroic journey and how he had been purified to fight corruption, for his people.
Trump claimed that because he was once a corrupt insider he knew how corrupt the system was & how to fix it. Trump explained repeatedly that he had gone from being the "ultimate insider" to the "ultimate outsider." What purified Trump, according to Trump?
This escalator ride.
Whaaaaat? You might think. Like, how did the escalator purify Trump to fight corruption? Obviously it didn't, but that is the ONLY reason Trump gave for his supposed shift from corrupt insider to heroic outsider.