[thread] It is interesting that those in power talk about security in nationalistic terms: national security; military capabilities, border control. But I wonder if, when thinking about the times you have felt your most insecure, if you ever think of it like that? #GV6 (1/8)
When we feel worried, scared, insecure, it is usually about completely different things. Have I got enough money to pay the rent? Will I get enough hours work to be able to do a food shop? Will I get a permanent contract at work? Will my children have a good future? (2/8)
In countries which are plagued with war & conflict, bombarded every day, I am sure a feeling of terror that a bomb, or a drone will mutilate or terminate your existence is the ultimate insecurity, an insecurity that questions your very existence. (3/8)
It is interesting that those in power try to paint an alternative to that terror as insecure, a scary unknown, rather than a peaceful, secure future. We know this is another lie, a gross manipulation of the way things could be. (4/8)
But I know, in the times I have felt most scared & vulnerable, I’ve had an overwhelming desire for security, familiarity and some sense of certainty. (5/8)
Socialism is about security in the most fundamental sense: it’s about taking away the deep uncertainty over income, housing & jobs. And it is a rejection of the notion that we must protect ourselves by bombing our way to security, with the endless suffering that brings. (6/8)
Security would be at the heart of a socialist system, precisely by addressing the root causes of our insecurity, by providing decent housing, adequate food, first class transport, education, health care & culture; and fulfilling, well-paid jobs. (7/8)
Rather than in the interests of big money, decisions would be made to secure the future of the planet, leaders would proudly commit to peace, rather than dropping bombs. Imagine not having all of that worry. Socialism is security. There is another way. (8/8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[thread] What does power mean to most of us in this country? What kind of power is actually useful to the majority of us? Is it the power of Governments committed to a harsh, uncaring capitalist system? #GV6#GrassrootsVoice (1/7)
Is it powerful corporations extracting more & more resources from our earth & more wealth from the workers who inhabit it? Do powerful banks work in our interests? What about powerful landlords? (2/7)
What if power could be used differently? Out of the hands of those who use it against our interests, whose business is death & destruction? Taken away from people who make decisions with disregard for the consequences – for our planet, for our well-being & health? (3/7)
[thread] When our opponents talk about socialism, they either talk about it as though it is some sort of utopian, fantasy idea that can never happen or a dangerous alternative to what we have right now. I just don’t connect with that view at all. (1/8) #GV6#GrassrootsVoice
My view of socialism is as a political expression of love for one another - a system based on our natural drive to love one another. The truth is, for so many millions of people in the UK & elsewhere in the world this capitalist system is hard, scary & uncertain.(2/8)
Socialism is a set of principles, a different way to organise the world. It is based on a common love for our fellow human beings - not about seeing other people as competition, but as others we can work with, who can enrich our experience in life. (3/8)
Rough sleeping has more than doubled since 2010. The number of people dying homeless has risen by 50% in the last 5 years (726 people last year). This shames us as a society. @UKLabour is right, as a party, to see it as a ‘moral mission’ to end it, within 5 years, via: (1/5)
👉 A £600 million ‘Modern Hostels Fund’ for good quality homeless accommodation with 5,000 additional bed spaces to take people off the streets & help them rebuild their lives. (2/5)
👉 A £200 million ‘Hostels Transformation Fund’ to turn existing hostels into places where homeless people can be more comfortable & turn their lives around. (3/5)
[thread] What would higher wages do for your local economy? In Preston, the @UKLabour council introduced the Real Living Wage to its workers & procured services from local companies who agreed to pay it too.(1/4)
Living wage employers in Preston range from multinational giants to SMEs; public sector institutions to charities. As a result of this investment in local business & the local workforce, the employment rate grew faster than in neighbouring towns and than the UK average.(2/4)
Last year, @PwC_UK & @Demos named Preston as the most improved city after it experienced growth in a wide range of areas. That’s the impact these simple, but innovative policies had. (3/4)
[thread] There’s been some discussion over @UKLabour’s tax policy in the last 24 hrs, given a bit of prominence by #bbcqt. An audience member said that, though he earned over £80k, he was nowhere near the top 5% of earners & went so far as to say he wasn’t in the top 50%. (1/8)
This is clearly false, but it has given rise to an interesting debate about tax, high pay & low pay. bbc.com/news/50517136 (2/8)
Whilst I get that those earning good incomes may not feel ‘rich’ for a variety of reasons (e.g outgoings, especially housing costs), the focus should really be on some very stark figures on low pay. That what’s often lost in any discussions about tax bands & top rates etc. (3/8)
[thread] On Sunday, @UKLabour announced we’d be introducing a £10 Real Living Wage, regardless of age. Many welcomed this policy, but some questioned the impact that it would have on employment. Here is the recent history of commitments to the minimum wage / living wage: (1/6)
👉 In 1997, when the Labour government announced the introduction of a minimum wage, some employers & right–wing parties said there would be job losses en masse. (2/6)
🤔 What happened? Unemployment fell and there was no evidence that the minimum wage had any negative impact on employment. (3/6)