The @EPSRC report on gender in the funding portfolio tells us women are less likely to apply for grants across the board & are less likely to be successful when they apply for large grants. How will this impact women’s careers & the research ecosystem? epsrc.ukri.org/files/aboutus/…
We know that in research - just as in pretty much all else in life- success breeds success. This report gives evidence of systematic biases and barriers which will inevitably have a huge impact on the careers of women in science.
Research is the one key achievement needed to climb the Academic ladder, and lack of access to grant funding is keeping women out of senior roles. We need more visible women at the top of our profession if we are serious about tackling lack of representation.
What used to be ‘anecdotal’ evidence is now backed up by numbers: men are awarded more, women less.
It would be lazy to think this is due to lack of ambition. Women go through a painful process of learning that teaches them that in asking for more, they are just reducing their chances to get funded.
Systems designed by men for men, and the ‘old boys network‘ conspire to keep women ‘in their place’. By ‘asking for less’, women effectively work more over their careers for less money overall, just to keep their research going. The cumulative effect in a career is huge.
Also, think about the psychological strain of engaging with institutional demand management processes in which women are often confronted with opposition not support; of a constant need to prove your worth and compete with men who have more privilege and access to resources.
Our current research funding system, of very low success rates and intense competition, breeds a culture where desperation can prevail over fairness, and where the opportunity to a short cut route to a large probability of a high value grant is never going to be turned down.
What we need is major systemic change: Political will to properly fund the research ecosystem; leadership committed to equity; and a recognition that policies and processes which ensure fairness and transparency are key to achieving the most from our talented researchers.
With the system as it stands - biased, and flawed, - everyone loses out. Not just women and other marginalised folk who suffer directly from the in-built unfairness. Science suffers. Technology suffers. Engineering suffers. Medicine suffers.
Innovations go unrealised, great ideas remain on the drawing board. The potential impact of the ingenuity of thousands of unique minds is lost.
This report on gender represents only the tip of the iceberg in uncovering the impact of our funding systems on the diversity of our scientific community, and issues affecting racial minorities, disabled people and LGBTQ+ people are far more profound.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with @TIGERinSTEMM

@TIGERinSTEMM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tigerinstemm

10 Oct
Phew! It’s been quite a week discussing the @EPSRC report on gender & the grant portfolio. Before leaving this subject, we want to highlight how great it is to see a research council publishing detailed & granular analysis. Here’s what’s good about it! epsrc.ukri.org/files/aboutus/…
1. The EPSRC have taken responsibility for analysing the data, not just reporting it. This is in stark contrast to the UKRI data release earlier in the year - where there is a lot of information, but almost no analysis or reflection.
2. The report seeks to reveal where the problems are, not hide them. By reporting success rate by grant value not by grant number, it lets us see where women are missing out, and where interventions might be deployed to make a real difference.
Read 10 tweets
8 Oct
Another key finding of the report on the EPSRC funding portfolio and gender is that the salaries requested by men are higher than those requested by women, and this gets more marked with the age of the applicant. epsrc.ukri.org/files/aboutus/…
The report is not entirely clear on this point. We *think* it is referring to the salary rates which PI’s request for their own contribution to the research project. The numbers in the report include the pension and oncosts in these salary rates.
Assuming we’re interpreting this correctly, it’s important to realise that the salaries PIs request on their grants do not reflect any kind of self-evaluation. These are the salaries set by the Institutions who employ the PIs, who are paying men more than women of a similar age.
Read 7 tweets
8 Oct
The @EPSRC report on gender and funding reveals that while women apply for smaller grants than men at every level, there are few clear patterns in what specific things they ask for less of, except for one point: women ask for less money for new equipment.
epsrc.ukri.org/files/aboutus/…
There’s been no investigation of the reasons for this yet, but we can make a hypothesis, based on one specific feature of the EPSRC application process: the EPSRC currently only fund 50% of most equipment requests, with Universities having to make up the other 50%.
Given we regularly see women complaining of institutional gatekeeping and a lack of university support for their applications, we hypothesise that getting the required commitment of Uni funding for 50% of a large piece of equipment is more difficult for women than men.
Read 10 tweets
7 Oct
The second key finding of the @EPSRC report on gender in the grant portfolio is basically that women have lower success rates than men when applying for high value grants. The chart of award rate by grant value range is so striking that we’re going to show it again here: Chart of success rate in EP...
In many ways, what’s striking here is not the lowish success rate for women applying for very large amounts of money, but the very high success rate for men.
For example the “Male AR by number” data tells us that roughly three quarters of men applying for >£10M get awarded the money they asked for. That compares to a typical ~30% success rate for lower grant values, with some recent responsive mode rounds having success rates <20%.
Read 15 tweets
28 Aug
Dear all, today I (@carlafmfaria) will take over, talk about myself & what I have learned on the way. I am a professor of physics at @UCL working on #attoscience, was born in the Amazon, & I am as mixed as it gets (ca 10 ethnic groups). Hope you enjoy it. Thread will come slowly
1) For those who don't know me, I am also an undercover Black Prof, lumped under “mixed other”. This has to do with not willing to wipe out mom’s Indigenous ancestry with a pen stroke. HR forms reflect British colonization and but my country was invaded by the Portuguese.
2) Being a pardo (Black person of Afro-European phenotype) is not a big deal in the Amazon, b/c we are 70% of the population (German husband is an attraction at the beach). My paleness puts me on top of the racial hierarchy, which shows you that race is a social construct.
Read 21 tweets
17 Jun
Today on @tigerinstemm we’re going to be talking about being an ally to trans colleagues. Our aim is to talk about some options in a way that is accessible to people who may not previously have thought about these issues. This thread will be added to throughout the day.
TIGERS members who are cis (i.e. whose gender identity conforms to their sex assigned at birth) try to be allies to our trans colleagues, who have been incredibly generous in educating us. This thread will explains some things we’ve learnt.
Many trans people change their names when they transition (begin to live according to their gender identity, rather than the sex they were assigned at birth). Some trans people refer to their previous names as “deadnames”. Calling them by these deadnames can be really hurtful.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!