A new digital regulatory agency is a TERRIBLE idea for many different reasons. First, there are no boundaries. Everything is digital these days. Second, the FTC and DOJ didn't lack jurisdiction, they just didn't act. Why would a new digital agency not repeat that?
Dodd-Frank was a failure, but liberals bought into it because we got a regulatory agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB was mostly useless, then Trump shut the CFPB down with a shrug.
The way to address structural problems on Wall Street is to *break up the big banks,* not by regulating them. The same thing is true with big tech. The solution for things that are too big is to make them smaller.
One good class action attorney with easier pleading standards on antitrust would be 100 times better on enforcement than a new shitty regulator.
It's private lawyers taking on Apple over app store abuse, it's class action lawyers going after Varsity's abuse in cheerleading. Etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The threats Facebook and Google made to Australia after that country attempted to regulate them come up in the Cicilline Report on big tech. Apparently @davidcicilline is unhappy when big tech monopolies threaten sovereign nations.
“It would be commercial suicide to be in Amazon’s crosshairs . . . If Amazon saw us criticizing, I have no doubt they would remove our access and destroy our business.”
- Anonymous partner of Amazon to the Antitrust Subcommittee
An attorney representing app developers said they “fear retaliation by Apple” and are “worried that their private communications are being monitored, so they won’t speak out against abusive and discriminatory behavior.”
1. I'm reading Republican @RepKenBuck's leaked views on the big tech antitrust hearing, and it's quite a remarkable document. First, the Chicago School has lost the argument. Buck endorses the the fact there's a monopoly crisis.
"Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook have used...
2. "... their monopoly power to act as gatekeepers to the marketplace, undermine potential competition, and pick winners and losers, all while simultaneously cozying up to unfriendly nations like China in order to further expand their global footprint."
3. "Big Tech's titans, with a combined market cap nearing $5 trillion, have tipped the technology marketplace towards monopoly. These tech titans have used their dominant positions to hike fees, misappropriate third-party data, steal IP..."
People on both sides of the aisle think my plan to make Trump the King of Florida is dumb, juvenile, unconstitutional, and totally impractical.
If both sides dislike it I must be doing something right!
A friend working for a Florida legislator once took a phone call from a constituent angry about Obamacare. She tried to explain that he should talk to his member of Congress, that this was the Florida legislature. He screamed at her and insisted there was no such thing.
In Goliath I found that there was a massive speculative land bubble in the Florida town of Nettie in 1925, which collapsed when investors realized that the town didn't exist. Seriously make Trump the King of Florida.
Fascinating dynamic at this hearing on antitrust and big tech. You got three Brandeisians testifying, two moderate Dems, two big tech libertarians, and anti-monopoly conservative @rachelbovard.
Ugh, @Jim_Jordan is such a dumb blowhard. In a serious hearing about monopoly power he's continuing to allege that big tech promotes progressives and censors conservatives. Then goes after Dems for trying to "radically rewrite antitrust laws."
Every single Republican on this subcommittee is serious except @Jim_Jordan. Some of the Rs don't want to change the laws, some do. But no one is a clown like Jordan and his clown staffer Tyler Grimm.
Glad that @Austan_Goolsbee has noticed that market power and corporate monopolization is dangerous, and that the CARES Act radically contributed to the problem. nytimes.com/2020/09/30/bus…
Why are big companies swallowing the world? It's a *political story.* I published this in 2016 and it still holds up. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
I will say, I find the idea that we never resorted to aggressive competition policy during national crises, as @DanielDancrane asserts and @Austan_Goolsbee repeats, is not really true.
Follow-up to the giant big tech CEO grillings. Thursday is a hearing on how to re-write antitrust. I'm hearing that, once again, @Jim_Jordan is pushing for pro-big tech nonsense. Meanwhile @RepKenBuck is actually trying to fight monopolies. Split among Rs. wsj.com/articles/break…
So @Jim_Jordan tried and failed to sabotage the big tech CEO hearing a few months ago. He's relentlessly working on behalf of big tech.
Ok so @Jim_Jordan's witnesses for the Antitrust big tech hearing follow-up are Christopher Yoo and Tad Lipsky. Both are funded by Google, Facebook, and Qualcomm.
There are some good Republicans on that subcommittee but Jordan is owned by big tech. It's embarrassing.