Health Nerd Profile picture
10 Oct, 6 tweets, 2 min read
It's fascinating what turns out to work in terms of helping people if you ignore empty moralizations about what we should and shouldn't do

This is but one example
For example, there's good evidence that an effective treatment for heroin abuse disorder is prescription (safe) heroin

bmj.com/content/327/74…
Safe injecting spaces - while counter-intuitive because you're assisting people in taking drugs - are arguably the most effective way to reduce the harms of some illegal drugs

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
While it's a complex relationship to untangle, there's quite compelling evidence that providing high-quality healthcare to prisoners saves money and reduces crime

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Conversely, cashless welfare, which is popular because we love to moralise about what people do with the money the govt gives them, are very unlikely to achieve their stated aims

theconversation.com/theres-mountin…
So honestly I find it completely unsurprising that, it some cases, the cheapest thing to do for homeless people is to give them money, even if that seems counter-intuitive to some

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Health Nerd

Health Nerd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GidMK

12 Oct
Recently, John Ioannidis, of "Most Published Research Findings Are False" fame, published a commentary piece on COVID-19 and global action

I thought it would be good to do a bit of peer-review on twitter 1/n Image
2/n You can find the paper here - it is a classic commentary piece, which means it is mostly the perspective of the author: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ec…
3/n Given the author's very strong public stance since early March, it is perhaps unsurprising that the main message of the piece appears to be that COVID-19 is not very bad but government actions are Image
Read 38 tweets
8 Oct
Apparently, there is a fly on Pence's head

I am not watching the debate
Every person in the U.S. simultaneously googles "Is fly on head a sign of COVID-19?"
Oh hey look
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
Men* with deep voices more likely** to be unfaithful***, research**** claims

*Chinese university students
**p=0.018
***to score higher on a self-report tool rating attitudes towards infidelity (r² = 0.22)
****single correlational study, n=234

FIXED IT
Honestly, this is a hilarious example of somewhat meaningless research being touted far and wide in the media
Read 11 tweets
5 Oct
I have great respect for people willing to take on the difficult question of balancing direct COVID-19 harms against the damage that control measures can do

I have no respect at all for people who minimize the harms of COVID-19 in order to make this argument
Yes, there are harms to disease-prevention measures. We should certainly be weighing these against the potential harms that unmitigated epidemics do and think carefully about our choices
But pretending that we can largely ignore COVID-19 without cost is just a disingenuous and nonsensical position that flies in the face of all evidence gathered to date
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct
You have to wonder at a statement that contains factual inaccuracies in the opening paragraphs

It is very much not certain that all populations will reach herd immunity 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
It doesn't really improve from there. These exact measures - or virtually identical ones - have been attempted in pretty much every country across the world for aged care

Unfortunately, it is REALLY HARD to keep COVID-19 out
This represents a very basic misunderstanding of COVID-19 risk - THERE IS NO EASY DELINEATION OF LOW/HIGH RISK
Read 6 tweets
4 Oct
Fun fact: Trump's doctor being an osteopath in any country but the U.S. would be super weird quackery but because osteopathy is weirdly integrated into medicine in the states it's pretty much normal there
Even more interesting is the history of osteopathy in the US, which started as pure quackery and then slowly drifted towards legitimacy over 150 years
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!