Here's how the GOP—the party that thinks we're all losers and suckers—operates: it drops our taxes by $50 while dropping taxes for the rich by trillions, and then, when Dems try to end this crazy GOP giveaway, shouts, "They're raising your taxes!" How stupid do they think we are?
The GOP platform on so many issues is a bait-and-switch con—making Trump the *perfect* party leader. On taxes, the GOP realized long ago that as long as a person's taxes will temporarily go up by $1 while a better tax cut is being passed, you can shout, "Your taxes are going up!"
And of course Democrats very much have it within their power—if they control Congress—to not repeal Trump's paltry middle-class tax cut until the moment they're replacing it with a better one, but the GOP—in its thetoric—always gets to indulge the idea that that plan won't work.
Fact-checkers are powerless against this GOP rhetoric, as they're interceding in a debate between the parties where the parties are talking past each other. Republicans are suddenly focused—for once—on the short-term, while the Democrats are focused on the middle- and long- term.
Moreover, while Democrats are realists who think about the total financial burden on a family and whether it's going up or down, the GOP—so careful to see billionaires' finances with a clear eye—preposterously deconstructs the average family's budget to make ridiculous arguments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(RETWEET) This may be the most incredible data visualization I've ever seen. It shows COVID-19 transforming from a blue-state scourge (spring 2020) to a red-state one (summer/fall 2020)—with the clear implication being that Trump led his cultists to death.
(PS) Of the two clearly blue states that stay on the visualization—California and Illinois—the latter is last on the list by the end, just about to drop off, and California (we must remember) had massive community spread early on because of travelers (US and foreign) from China.
(PS2) This visualization starts shortly after the partial lockdowns ended—the point at which Trump went to war not against the virus but against lockdowns, convincing red-state voters to rebel against such basic pandemic-response measures. Here we see the deadly—harrowing—result.
Readers of this feed have heard me saying this near-daily for six months now, based on under-reported major-media reporting. Well, finally someone's put it all in a study: nbcnews.com/health/health-…
EXCESS deaths—versus similar pre-COVID-19 timeframe—as of 7/31: 225,530
OFFICIAL deaths from COVID-19—in US—as of 7/31: 157,202
UNEXPLAINED deaths as of 7/31, now thought to be largely uncounted COVID-19 deaths: 68,328
UNDERCOUNT through 7/31, as estimated on this feed: 60,000
PS/ I note the above just to underscore that when I was writing on this feed that the death toll was low by 60,000 through July 31, I was working from major-media reporting and not just blowing smoke. This new study has now—sadly—confirmed what everyone read here many months ago.
I'm finding it hard to care about the Barrett hearings because (1) the only meaningful option Democrats had was to try to stop them from happening, and they let them happen, (2) Barrett can and will make her own recusal decisions, (3) credentials are immaterial in the Trump era.
The calculus was—and is—simple: it was—and is—an obscenity that the nomination is going forward at this historical moment and on this timeline, but the moment it did go forward, the hearings became mere theater. No one cares about her credentials. Either she has the votes or not.
Is it possible Democrats will suddenly unearth something big about about Barrett? Sure—but that could come out as easily in the news as via hearings, and if GOP senators wouldn't convict Trump on overwhelming evidence, why would they block Barrett due to some big new revelation?
Please remember that the New York Times reported *months ago* that the official COVID-19 death toll in the United States represents an undercount of somewhere between 40,000 and 80,000. So every time you see or hear the nation's COVID-19 death toll, the number is off. By a *lot*.
The way to think of it as we had toward election day is this: there's no question more than a quarter of a million Americans have died in just 7 months from contracting COVID-19—the only question we don't have an answer to is how *many* more than a quarter of a million have died.
Every time media refuses to acknowledge the very undercount that *it itself* reported, it benefits the Trump administration by severely understating the toll of its malfeasance and incompetence.
It also provides an opening for Trumpists to lie about the severity of the pandemic.
(PS) Keep in mind that many schools opened in mid-September, and many colleges and universities that reopened in early September didn't begin reporting their clusters until mid-September. And remember the incubation period of the virus. And this is what October looks like so far.
(PS2) We can't clearly say what's caused the current spike—but it seems too early for a flu-season effect and the weather hasn't changed so significantly that folks are suddenly regularly staying indoors. The most dramatic change in the last four weeks has been schools reopening.
ICYMI: Know who went to Moscow in 2013 to let the Russians and their allies in Ukraine know Trump would be running for POTUS? Phil Ruffin (not clear if his Ukrainian wife went).
Know who co-owns the Trump hotel that sent out $21 million in suspicious payments pre-election?
PS: Remember, when the Kremlin-agent Agalarovs came to Vegas to offer Trump ~$20 million in June 2013, they were coming to Ruffin's bailiwick. Isn't it interesting that a Ruffin-owned Vegas hotel suddenly had $21 million to give directly to Trump just weeks before the 2016 vote?
PS2: To be clear, I understand the NYT is saying the 2016 money may have come from an LA bank loan. But Ruffin guaranteed the $30 million loan with no real hope of Trump paying it back. What influx of cash to Ruffin suddenly allowed him to guarantee that loan? That's my question.