I'm finding it hard to care about the Barrett hearings because (1) the only meaningful option Democrats had was to try to stop them from happening, and they let them happen, (2) Barrett can and will make her own recusal decisions, (3) credentials are immaterial in the Trump era.
The calculus was—and is—simple: it was—and is—an obscenity that the nomination is going forward at this historical moment and on this timeline, but the moment it did go forward, the hearings became mere theater. No one cares about her credentials. Either she has the votes or not.
Is it possible Democrats will suddenly unearth something big about about Barrett? Sure—but that could come out as easily in the news as via hearings, and if GOP senators wouldn't convict Trump on overwhelming evidence, why would they block Barrett due to some big new revelation?
The purpose of the hearings becomes, then, to rile up one's base while not riling up the other party's base. But the GOP has the big advantage here, because by holding the hearings they're riling up their base, and by refusing to try to block them Democrats are depressing theirs.
Fact: no U.S. senator can persuade a SCOTUS Justice on recusal. Justices do whatever they want on recusal, and usually—these days—for partisan reasons. And if a voter doesn't know the issues that are at stake in this election...are they really someone who's watching this hearing?
The Democrats had *two* options: 1) be Gandalf ("You shall not pass!"), (2) spend two weeks using these hearings as as an earned-media advertisement for the Democratic agenda—even as the hearings happening in the first place underscores that agendas are meaningless without power.
I don't like dramatic irony. I don't like being manipulated into caring about an event whose outcome is predetermined. These hearings are a farce. Amy Barrett could be *Jack the Ripper* and if Trump commanded the GOP to confirm her, it would do so. This is all risible stagecraft.
If I were the Democrats, I would've boycotted the hearings if there wasn't a way to stop them. Make history; make the news; make a statement; make a stand; make it clear that the event is outside normal business and will be rectified by future acts the moment the GOP loses power.
But no politician gives up a chance to be on camera—and the Democrats rarely miss an opportunity to normalize the Republicans' full-scale assault on our democracy by actively participating in the intermittent pageants the Republicans schedule to celebrate their attack on America.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The bestseller that disproves everything Trump is saying today. Please RETWEET.
✅ "A searing indictment"—NPR
✅ "A strong case"—Kirkus
📶 USA Today bestseller
📶 Amazon / Audible / Apple Books bestseller
💟 "⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️"—1350 Amazon ratings (Proof series) amazon.com/dp/1250272998?…
PS/ We now have major-media journalists tweeting out—and tweeting about—the New York Post story fed to it by Rudy Giuliani and Kremlin agents as though the story doesn't include a *massive* factual error in its *very first paragraph*. This is lunacy. We already know the truth.
PS2/ At the time Shokin was fired by Ukraine's congress—an action supported by the *entire West*—he had helped a Burisma executive *escape* prosecution and a probe relating to the company (involving a period of time before Hunter was there) had a negotiated settlement in process.
This whole story is explained in great detail in my book Proof of Corruption. What's going to happen today is that a large number of journalists who never advised people to read that book are going to frantically tell people not to believe the lies that it conclusively disproved.
1/ I tweeted out for months that lies about Biden and Ukraine were coming soon from Giuliani and others who had been involved in 2016 "October surprises," like Steve Bannon and certain right-wing media outlets. And I said I'd written a book to counter that Kremlin disinformation.
2/ I don't know if it's too late now or not. Apparently Maggie Haberman, the New York Post, Giuliani and Bannon are now pushing Kremlin disinformation as an "October surprise"...
...that was conclusively disproven in a national bestseller. I did what I could to get the word out.
(RETWEET) This may be the most incredible data visualization I've ever seen. It shows COVID-19 transforming from a blue-state scourge (spring 2020) to a red-state one (summer/fall 2020)—with the clear implication being that Trump led his cultists to death.
(PS) Of the two clearly blue states that stay on the visualization—California and Illinois—the latter is last on the list by the end, just about to drop off, and California (we must remember) had massive community spread early on because of travelers (US and foreign) from China.
(PS2) This visualization starts shortly after the partial lockdowns ended—the point at which Trump went to war not against the virus but against lockdowns, convincing red-state voters to rebel against such basic pandemic-response measures. Here we see the deadly—harrowing—result.
Readers of this feed have heard me saying this near-daily for six months now, based on under-reported major-media reporting. Well, finally someone's put it all in a study: nbcnews.com/health/health-…
EXCESS deaths—versus similar pre-COVID-19 timeframe—as of 7/31: 225,530
OFFICIAL deaths from COVID-19—in US—as of 7/31: 157,202
UNEXPLAINED deaths as of 7/31, now thought to be largely uncounted COVID-19 deaths: 68,328
UNDERCOUNT through 7/31, as estimated on this feed: 60,000
PS/ I note the above just to underscore that when I was writing on this feed that the death toll was low by 60,000 through July 31, I was working from major-media reporting and not just blowing smoke. This new study has now—sadly—confirmed what everyone read here many months ago.
Here's how the GOP—the party that thinks we're all losers and suckers—operates: it drops our taxes by $50 while dropping taxes for the rich by trillions, and then, when Dems try to end this crazy GOP giveaway, shouts, "They're raising your taxes!" How stupid do they think we are?
The GOP platform on so many issues is a bait-and-switch con—making Trump the *perfect* party leader. On taxes, the GOP realized long ago that as long as a person's taxes will temporarily go up by $1 while a better tax cut is being passed, you can shout, "Your taxes are going up!"
And of course Democrats very much have it within their power—if they control Congress—to not repeal Trump's paltry middle-class tax cut until the moment they're replacing it with a better one, but the GOP—in its thetoric—always gets to indulge the idea that that plan won't work.
Please remember that the New York Times reported *months ago* that the official COVID-19 death toll in the United States represents an undercount of somewhere between 40,000 and 80,000. So every time you see or hear the nation's COVID-19 death toll, the number is off. By a *lot*.
The way to think of it as we had toward election day is this: there's no question more than a quarter of a million Americans have died in just 7 months from contracting COVID-19—the only question we don't have an answer to is how *many* more than a quarter of a million have died.
Every time media refuses to acknowledge the very undercount that *it itself* reported, it benefits the Trump administration by severely understating the toll of its malfeasance and incompetence.
It also provides an opening for Trumpists to lie about the severity of the pandemic.