A web browser is after all essentially an OS. It has an interpreter, you write apps for it, and so on. ChromeOS took this to its natural conclusion.
A blockchain is also an OS. It has a compiler, you write apps for it, and so on. What will take this to its natural conclusion?
One consequence of this line of thinking: the era of operating system innovation may be about to begin again.
It's been Linux, Mac, Windows for generations. But modern blockchains have UXs (block explorers), communities, interoperability, novel applications, and monetization.
We already knew how crypto enables competition with Facebook & Twitter. Crypto social networks improve monetization, identity, hosting, etc.
But the OS lens gives a long-term roadmap for competing with parts of Google, Apple, MS. Use a blockchain to go after the OS and browser.
Remember also that early operating systems and browsers operated in highly resource constrained environments. Programs needed to be optimized to the kilobyte or sometimes the byte.
We're still in that era in crypto. But extrapolate out five, ten, fifteen, twenty years...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A fundamental issue is that viral content tends to be provocative. In theory it's possible to change the incentive structure, as shown by these two graphs. facebook.com/notes/mark-zuc…
Right now, the "policy line" is determined by community reaction or manual platform review. So there are humans in the loop.
However, if FB or Twitter's databases were open source, anyone could try ML to try predicting virality & sentiment for a post. Probably some signal there.
Of course, the problem with ML-based pre-publication content review by FB/Twitter is that these are for-profit American companies put in the role of soft censoring millions.
I think many people there have good intent, but as folks have noted the potential for abuse is obvious.
Consulting (v1): open source the code, sell consulting
Cloud (v2): open source some code, but sell a closed source cloud complement
Community (v3): open source all code, and issue a token or charge for access to the community
The consulting model didn't scale because you had to keep finding great engineers and selling their time by the hour. Hard to do that endlessly.
The community model does scale because essentially each community member is buying time from each other. You're just the moderator.
Thesis: many SaaS companies will eventually issue a karma token (or be outcompeted by one that does). They set up a developer marketplace / StackOverflow equivalent where experts earn and charge crypto karma for advice. Would work for Figma, Mixpanel, etc.
- It's recent (note the mention of Game of Thrones), yet immediately archaic
- It has zero reference to math, physics, technology texts
- It ignores the descent of many formerly "high" institutions into clickbait
You can't get away from ranking. Otherwise Google wouldn't exist. But this exercise shows these ranks to be very much in flux, with important actors left completely off the map, as well as any acknowledgment of how much individual *disagreement* there would be about ranks.
Boston Dynamics seems to have raised only $37M. They will be at $35M in revenue if they can sell even 500 Spots at $75k a unit.
Security patrol seems like the application that can justify the expense. Basically a mobile security camera with a whoa factor.
If you look at most tweets, people are scared of this thing. Of course they would be! It’s headless and moves kinda weird. Classic uncanny valley.
But a degree of fear is the property many want in a guard dog, like a Doberman or Rottweiler. So security seems like the use case.
If these price points are real, Boston Dynamics has a shot at completely owning the guard dogs market.
There are many ways in which robot dogs are better than live dogs for this specific purpose. Unkillable, remote controllable, networked, equipped with video & microphone, etc.