fun fact: political parties aren't mentioned in the Constitution
"The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism." - George Washington, 1796
senators saying this Court nomination has nothing to do w/politics are just lying. 51 GOP senators said they would support the nominee before they knew who the nominee was (2 said they wouldn't support pre-election), and almost all 47 Dem/aligned senators said they'd oppose
not like this is new, though - the Supreme Court was long a political institution. Then, through part of the 20th Century, it was treated as apolitical. What changed in the last 30 or so years is that it became a *partisan* institution too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Obama in @PodSaveAmerica interview says Trump used to say nice things about him until he saw birtherism was popular and essentially said, "if that's what folks want, I can do that with even less inhibition. I don't need a dog whistle, I'm just gonna go ahead and say it"
more Obama, making a point he has many times before but now with a Q mention: "when you look at insane conspiracy theories like QAnon seeping into the mainstream of the Republican Party, what that tells you is that there are no more guardrails within that media ecosystem."
Obama on Trump's continuing to say he should be indicted:
"I'm not surprised by it, that it continues. I'm disappointed that Republicans who know better have not checked him on this."
Aides are insisting Trump's campaign event at White House isn't political b/c they're not providing materials: "We're not handing out anything but people can bring things onto the complex," is the line, per pool reporter @toddgillman.
Also: attendance downgraded to "hundreds"
Excerpts from a speech that the White House says has absolutely nothing to do with his campaign:
Doing a speech in which “Blexit” is a central topic is the latest example of how Trump continues to look at the world from inside the Fox/conservative media fishbowl. No one outside it would have ever even heard of this term.
court expansion is a real question Biden will grapple w/if he wins--but it's also a perfect example of how skilled Republicans are at shifting the conversation. They've broken precedent on two seats now, and are stoking outrage about how Dems *might* break precedent in the future
in the VP debate on Wednesday, Pence literally used the court question to shift the conversation when pressed about the health care plan that Trump has been promising for 4 years and still hasn't been able to produce--but because the Court question is new, that gets the coverage
Essentially, Rs are saying they hit Democrats 2x b/c they could, but they want Dems to commit to not punching back if/when they can. (Also:even if Biden is for expansion, doesn't mean he'd have enough senators to go along w/it. Almost every R senator has backed both Court moves)
The current @prioritiesUSA Electoral College projection shows a close race in many states, but no clear path to 270 for Trump:
This is Democratic super PAC data - but it's not just polling Democrats. And these numbers seem to point to why the race is turning: low favorability toward Trump, less confidence in the track of the country especially with COVID, and Biden starting to get an enthusiasm lead:
Trump's own COVID infection seems to have had a clear impact on his numbers:
.@HillaryClinton on her collapse with pneumonia in 2016 vs Trump now: "It’s apples and oranges, completely. When I was diagnosed with walking pneumonia, I was immediately put on antibiotics. I was told that I was not contagious" theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
more Clinton on Trump: "I don’t really have anything to contribute to the ongoing saga of why he behaves the way he does, and why he treats people the way he does, and why he won’t listen to people who actually know something. It’s pretty distressing on all fronts."
So now the question: if Trump doesn’t show to the virtual debate and Biden does, does the commission just give Biden all the airtime?
Between his performance at the first debate and this announcement, Trump is saying he gets to set the rules and terms of the debate. It’s obviously not a debate if only one shows, but the commission has to decide now if it goes w/the candidate who follows the rules or who breaks.
The *only* reason that the commission shifted to a virtual debate is because it’s Trump who is positive for COVID. And we already know that he skipped the pre-debate COVID test that his campaign had agreed he would take last week. So he is the one who created this situation.