1) The presence of a “quroum” is usually not an issue for Senate committees or the Senate itself to conduct business.
2) But issues of whether or not the Judiciary Committee has the presence of more than half of its members to constitute a quorum could impact how quickly the Senate can move the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court.
3) Moreover, the physical presence of senators is required on the Senate floor itself to vote. Senators cannot vote remotely unlike the House of Representatives. The House set up a remote voting regimen to cope with the pandemic in the spring.
4) There are 22 members of the Judiciary Committee. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) declared over the weekend that Democrats “will not supply the quorum. Period.”
5) In other words, Republicans will have to provide more than half of the members to do business at a “markup” session on Barrett’s nomination. A “markup” is where the committee sends the nomination itself to the floor.
6) The first “markup” will likely happen later in the day on Thursday, October 15. Democrats already plan to invoke committee rules which allow them to delay the markup for a week. But, there could be issues if there aren’t enough senators on present on October 15th.
7) That could delay the process further. This could be an issue if there are additional coronavirus cases or senators must quarantine.
The real need for a quorum is likely to materialize on Thursday, October 22.
8) That’s the day that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has long said he intends to conduct a vote on the nominee in committee.
9) Committee rules require a quorum of the 22 members of the committee be present to conduct a markup session for the nominee.
10) Let’s say hypothetically there issues with attendance are on the GOP side of the aisle due to health/quarantine. Democrats could potentially help Republicans constitute a quorum to do business. But Schumer says Democrats won’t do that.
11) It’s simple. No quorum. No markup. The Barrett nomination is stuck in committee. Senators can vote by proxy in committee. But a proxy vote cannot be a determinative vote. Otherwise, a nomination remains bottled up in committee.
12) The practice of sending Supreme Court nominees to the floor with less-than-stellar Judiciary Committee recommendations is not without precedent.
In 1991, the Judiciary Committee sent the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the floor with “no recommendation
13) That vote was 13-1. The committee settled to “no recommendation” after it deadlocked 7-7 to give Thomas a “favorable” recommendation. In 1987, the Judiciary Committee rejected a “favorable” recommendation for Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork 9-5.
14) The committee then voted 9-5 to send Bork’s nomination to the floor with an “unfavorable” recommendation. The full Senate then rejected Bork 58-42. Bork became only the 11th High Court nominee defeated on the floor.
15) Regardless, if things go smoothly in committee, we would expect Barrett’s nomination to be on the Senate floor the week of October 25 with a vote toward the end of the week. But if the nomination hits a problem in committee, who knows?
16) If the nomination is on the floor, it’s likely Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) will immediately file cloture to bring an end to debate later that week.
17) Under the provisions of “Nuclear Option II” (which lowered the bar to end debate for Supreme Court nominations from 60 to 51), we would expect the Senate to vote confirm Barrett around the end of October.
18) Now let’s consider a scenario where the Barrett nomination is on the floor – but there is another problem with health and quarantines. Senators CANNOT VOTE REMOTELY ON THE FLOOR FOR ANY REASON. They must be there in person to vote.
19) Don’t forget that McConnell chided the House earlier this summer for implementing a remote voting plan. However, McConnell even expressed concerns of late about how lax White House protocols were combatting coronavirus.
20) If senators can’t show up, Republicans could have trouble confirming Barrett. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME) have both expressed concern about a rapid confirmation of Barrett. It appears there are only 51 GOP yeas to confirm Barrett.
21) If Republican senators are absent for any reason, that could pose a problem for confirming Barrett.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad Pergram

Chad Pergram Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChadPergram

14 Oct
1) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Stacy Staggs, a mother of 7-year old twins. Stacy’s twins have multiple pre-existing conditions due to their premature birth and rely on the Affordable Care Act’s protections.
2) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Dr. Farhan Bhatti, a family physician and CEO of Care Free Medical. Will discuss impacts to patients if the Supreme Court overturns the Affordable Care Act.
3) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Crystal Good who pushed to obtain an abortion at age 16
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
1) It’s like opposite day on a potential coronavirus bill. Or the Twilight Zone.

Nothing makes sense right now.
2) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) have different problems. McConnell has a conference which either doesn’t want to do another coronavirus bill – or wants to do the bare minimum.
3) But McConnell’s putting a narrow coronavirus bill on the floor next week. Pelosi has a caucus which wants to do another coronavirus bill. But Pelosi isn’t budging.
Read 8 tweets
13 Oct
1) Just a few days ago, President Trump declared an end to coronavirus talks. But the talks kept going – despite the President’s admonition. President Trump also said there would not be an effort to do a coronavirus bill until after the election.
2) then the President abruptly switched course. Mr. Trump also said he asked Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to focus instead on confirming Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
3) Now McConnell says the Senate will attempt to tackle some sort of “targeted” coronavirus bill sometime after October 19, but before they put the Barrett nomination on the floor toward the end of the month.
Read 21 tweets
12 Oct
A) 2020 election tactics are on display at Barrett's confirmation hearing.
B) Senate Republicans are repeatedly blasting Democrats for attacking Barrett’s faith. This stems from questions and reservations Democrats posed to Barrett when she was nominated for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017.
C) Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee proclaimed “the dogma lives loudly within you” at the 2017 hearing.
Read 8 tweets
12 Oct
1) GOP LA Sen Kennedy works in references to movies Star Wars, Rosemary’s Baby, The Blues Brothers and O Brother, Where Art Thou? in opening statement at Barrett hearing, all homages to American cinema
2) Kennedy starts with a reference to the song “The Big Rock Candy Mountains” which was featured in “O Brother, Where Art Thou.” Kennedy says the confirmation process isn’t supposed to be “The Big Rock Candy Mountains.”
3) That’s a song about a Xanadu on Earth “where handouts grow on bushes” and “streams of alcohol come trickling down the rocks.”
Read 6 tweets
12 Oct
1) What is past is prologue.
 
The explosive confirmation hearing for Clarence Thomas in the fall of 1991 set the table for the Kavanaugh experience. The hyper-combustible Kavanaugh confirmation process propelled the confirmation hearings into the stratosphere
2) That in turn sets the tables for hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Days before an election. The High Court is poised to swing well to the conservative side of the ledger.
3) The controversy of a breakneck confirmation process, augmented by how Senate Republicans dissed President Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court in 2016, Merrick Garland.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!