1/Here's my post on today's Econ Nobel Prize:

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/As my colleague @skominers wrote, this prize is well-deserved!

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
3/In fact it was always pretty obvious that Milgrom would win it, and his thesis advisor Wilson is no slouch either!

marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu…

marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu…
4/But the fact that the prize was given for auction theory shows how the field of economics is changing.

Auction theory, unlike many econ theories, makes mathematically precise and accurate predictions that can be used to create real-world technologies that really work!
5/Many econ theories are just mathematical parables. They have equations in them, but the variables don't correspond exactly to real things.

For example, take Milgrom's model of financial market trading (with Lawrence Glosten):

web.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publi…
5/This model separates traders into several distinct types -- informed traders, market makers, and noise traders. That's a useful way to think about asymmetric information in trading! But in real life, people aren't neatly divided into those types.

web.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publi…
6/Auction theory is different. Unlike stylized models that tell stories, auction theory can make quantitative predictions. And that can help people design auctions that yield consistently better outcomes.

nber.org/papers/w14765
7/Getting auction theory right is complicated and difficult, because auctions themselves are complicated and difficult. That's why Milgrom and Wilson's work was so impressive.

afinetheorem.wordpress.com/2020/10/12/ope…
8/Milgrom and Wilson famously helped the FCC auction wireless spectrum rights efficiently.

But auction theory has a very broad array of real-world uses. Google's entire revenue model is powered by auction theory.

wsj.com/articles/SB108…
9/Nor is auction theory the only kind of economic theory that produces such precise, accurate, useful results. Matching theory, which won the Nobel in 2012, is another example.

nobelprize.org/prizes/economi…
10/Auction theory is one of several reasons that economists are getting jobs in the private sector. There are now econ theories that work so well in the real world that they're economically valuable.

Economists are becoming engineers.
11/As more economic interactions happen between computers, expect this trend to continue. Algorithms are pretty close to the idealized "homo economicus" that economists' theories are well-equipped to deal with.
12/John Maynard Keynes famously said: "If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people on a level with dentists, that would be splendid."

Perhaps they won't be dentists, but engineers.

(end)

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

14 Oct
1/People sometimes ask me how I form my ideas about the world! Well, folks, there are basically two ingredients: Song lyrics, and data.

Just read a bunch of papers and articles and stuff, and try to relate it to song lyrics.
2/Let's go through an example: How the song "Kyoto", by Phoebe Bridgers, illustrates some of the problems with the American development model (infrastructure, education, and health).

3/We start the song in Japan, where the narrator (presumably, Phoebe herself) is utterly uninterested in the country or its culture, but finds bullet trains, pay phones (!!), and chain convenience stores pretty convenient. Image
Read 16 tweets
13 Oct
1/Buildings in San Francisco that look like sand-colored rectangles: A thread Image
2/Let's start with Market Center, a tower complex that looks like it was designed by a 6-year-old boy learning to use the rectangle tool in Microsoft Paint: Image
3/Or 525 Market Street, which looks like the same kid's drawing, but several minutes later Image
Read 20 tweets
13 Oct
I feel like to effectively run as a strongman, you actually have to...be strong?

Trump ran face-first into COVID, failed to protect the nation from a pandemic, failed to get the military to be his enforcers, and presided under an unprecedented decline in American power.
Actual "strongman" things Trump has done:

1. Sent federal agents to Portland who accomplished nothing and we're kicked out

2. Mistreated a bunch of helpless asylum seekers who *turned themselves in*

3. Authorized a few ICE sweeps that didn't do much at all
What else is "strong" about Trump?

His tariffs were weak sauce that ended up backfiring.

He had that one Iranian general killed, I guess.

He tweeted a lot of angry tweets about China...
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct
It's a little more complicated.

Unobservable structural parameters are fine IF you're willing to reject structural models outright, based on data.

But if (like many economists) you don't reject models, unmeasurable variables can lead to misspecification that never goes away.
For example: The coefficient of relative risk aversion. If people don't have CRRA preferences, this isn't a structural parameter; it changes when risk changes. So if preferences aren't CRRA and you decide rho=2, you're going to run into problems...
Of course, the example everyone is thinking about is TFP. A certain Nobel-winning business cycle model (which shall remain nameless) famously assumed that the TFP residual is exogenous and follows an AR(1) process. That turned out to be wrong in any number of ways...
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
1/Today's @bopinion post is about Trump's taxes, and what they show about how America allocates capital.

We appear to have some big problems.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/Trump has a bunch of businesses that lose money. Our financial system has lent him money to throw into unsuccessful golf courses, hotels, and so on.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3/A lot of these loans are loans that Trump hasn't even paid back yet, using loopholes in the tax system to avoid paying taxes on those unpaid debts.

Why would creditors give money to a guy who wastes the money on bad businesses and doesn't even pay them back?
Read 13 tweets
7 Oct
WOW. It isn't just in the U.S. where negative opinions of China have soared. It's all across the developed world.

pewresearch.org/global/2020/10…
The % of people with no confidence in Xi Jinping is now over 70% in every country surveyed.

Japan (84%) and South Korea (83%) are the most negative on Xi.
Here's a longer-term picture.

Almost every country surveyed seems to have become more unfavorable towards China around 2012, when Xi took power. And then there was another big jump in unfavorability this year.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!