He resigned over misleading an anti-corruption inquiry about accepting a secret $3,000 gift from the CEO of Eddie Obeid's water company, but sure let's call it "a bottle of wine"
It's worth reading O'Farrell's *extremely emphatic* denial about this event just three years earlier when you think about what "misleading the inquiry" means in that sentence. Apparently his memory was just a bit patchy.
Apparently Barry O'Farrell is a wonderful gossip and great fun with reporters and so the general consensus is the whole thing was a harmless muddle.
On the other hand, it's a good idea for journalists to just state the facts, even when they don't look great for people they like.
I'm not making any comment on Gladys here. To be honest I haven't followed the twists and turns of that case closely enough to have a strong view. But the case for O'Farrell resigning was open-and-shut.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One issue is that America, paradoxically, has *too much democracy*.
The constitution puts states in charge of running elections, and almost everywhere that means elected officials are the umpires of the electoral process.
They have an obvious conflict of interest.
In New Zealand, as with most democracies other than the U.S., elections are run by an independent national commission controlled by independent, non-partisan bureaucrats.
I think some people are a bit confused about how the shell game works in this great piece of @nytimes reporting on the Trump Organization, so here's a quick model that will hopefully clarify it a bit:
What China does over the next five years will have by far the biggest impact on our ability to live within the world's carbon budget.
China's greenhouse emissions are now greater than those of Europe and the U.S. put together.
That's worrying because while coal, the dirtiest fuel, is dying a rapid death in Europe and the U.S., it still receives a great deal of political support and subsidy in China:
If Australia wants to subsidize its mining, farming and packaging sectors, maybe it should just do that, instead of spending bajillions on boondoggle gas infrastructure whose main function will be to give those sectors under-priced raw materials?
I like ammonia and olefins as much as the next person but there's a global market for this stuff, you don't need to build a government-funded fantasy domestic gas industry to get hold of it.
I realise we're all meant to pretend that building a couple of gas storage tanks at Wallumbilla will magically turn Australia into some South Korea-style heavy manufacturing hub.