How is it that New Zealand is pulling off an election amid pandemic with aplomb, while the U.S. is on the brink of chaos?

I can see a few simple fixes and a deep fundamental problem:
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
One issue is that America, paradoxically, has *too much democracy*.

The constitution puts states in charge of running elections, and almost everywhere that means elected officials are the umpires of the electoral process.

They have an obvious conflict of interest.
In New Zealand, as with most democracies other than the U.S., elections are run by an independent national commission controlled by independent, non-partisan bureaucrats.
That's a good thing! Take electoral boundary decisions. In America these are a rightly controversial abuse of process that results in situations like North Carolina, where Republicans have 10 of 13 districts despite barely winning 50% of the vote in 2018.

slate.com/news-and-polit…
In other countries they barely impact on the public consciousness, even in situations like Australia's 2019 election where boundary reviews notionally the government to lose its majority of the parliament before a vote was cast.

They're uncontroversial because they're fair!
The U.S. does have independent national bodies, like the Commission on Presidential Debates, which seem to be trusted to carry out election-related business in an even-handed manner.

It should try doing something similar with *really* important electoral business!
As far as I can see, states can delegate their constitutional power to run elections wherever they want.

In practice they delegate it down to the more than 10,000 municipalities, making things even more confusing.

But they could delegate *up* to a national elections commission.
I tend to think these sorts of changes wouldn't be enough, though. And I think that's where the deep fundamental problem comes in.
I sometimes hear people talk about New Zealand as a "young democracy" but if you think about that term as meaning "universal suffrage" it's really the oldest democracy on the planet.

Elections started in the 1850s, Maori got the vote in 1867, and women in 1893.
The U.S. is the real young democracy here. After a brief dawn during the post-Civil War Reconstruction era, universal suffrage only really started when the 1965 Voting Rights Act cleared out Jim Crow policies from the Southern states.
Half of voters in the 2018 midterms were born before the Voting Rights Act was passed and the Supreme Court has been gutting it since 2013.

The idea that suffrage can be denied to skew electoral outcomes is a longstanding U.S. tradition that hasn't yet been stamped out.
Ultimately I think the situation in America doesn't get better until all political actors accept that the right to political representation is as fundamental as the Declaration of Independence and Constitution say it is. (ends)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Fickling

David Fickling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidfickling

12 Oct
He resigned over misleading an anti-corruption inquiry about accepting a secret $3,000 gift from the CEO of Eddie Obeid's water company, but sure let's call it "a bottle of wine"
It's worth reading O'Farrell's *extremely emphatic* denial about this event just three years earlier when you think about what "misleading the inquiry" means in that sentence. Apparently his memory was just a bit patchy.
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
I think some people are a bit confused about how the shell game works in this great piece of @nytimes reporting on the Trump Organization, so here's a quick model that will hopefully clarify it a bit:

nytimes.com/interactive/20…
@nytimes Imagine a real estate business, let's call it Prumt Tower. It's worth $80 million, and purchase was financed with a 70% loan and 30% equity:
@nytimes Here's one ordinary way you could run that business:
Read 21 tweets
22 Sep
I just got an email pitch about how Venezuela is narrowing its budget deficit and whether this is a model for other emerging markets to emulate.

I can think of easier ways to get your budget in balance than economic collapse followed by being locked out of global bond markets.
It's strangely easy to stop the government spending more than it receives in tax revenues when the government can't borrow money!
But it's probably easier to just, I dunno, change the indexation rules on public pension payments.
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
It's possible that some of the most important news about the future of the global climate came out last week without most people noticing.

Quick thread to explain why:

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
What China does over the next five years will have by far the biggest impact on our ability to live within the world's carbon budget.

China's greenhouse emissions are now greater than those of Europe and the U.S. put together. Image
That's worrying because while coal, the dirtiest fuel, is dying a rapid death in Europe and the U.S., it still receives a great deal of political support and subsidy in China:

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…

The policies set this year for the 14th five-year plan will run through 2025.
Read 11 tweets
21 Sep
Reading my mentions after writing about oat milk I think I've finally found a topic on which there is absolutely zero middle ground. 😮
I say this as someone who has published articles on the subject of Vegemite!
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
While we're at it, Starship Troopers is neither a terrible nor amazing film, it's just sort of meh.
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep
If Australia wants to subsidize its mining, farming and packaging sectors, maybe it should just do that, instead of spending bajillions on boondoggle gas infrastructure whose main function will be to give those sectors under-priced raw materials?
I like ammonia and olefins as much as the next person but there's a global market for this stuff, you don't need to build a government-funded fantasy domestic gas industry to get hold of it.
I realise we're all meant to pretend that building a couple of gas storage tanks at Wallumbilla will magically turn Australia into some South Korea-style heavy manufacturing hub.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!