Under indicators of the @UN Sustainable Development Goals the world is making progress with respect to disasters - but there is no guarantee that it will continue, sustained effort is needed
Vulnerability has decreased globally:
"Results show a clear decreasing trend in both human & economic vulnerability, with global average mortality & economic loss rates that have dropped by 6.5 and nearly 5 times, respectively, from 1980–1989 to 2007–2016" sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Progress on disasters with respect to UN SDG indicators can be seen across all global income categories thelancet.com/journals/lance…
What matters most for continued progress with respect to disasters?
Governance
Accountability
Energy access
Infrastructure
and more
Really insightful new essay by Simon Robertson on issues raised by the IPCC dual roles in both assessing and producing climate research onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…
Back in 2007, in its annual report CRED/EM-DAT warned about using pre-2000 data to say anything about climate change, because of the massive increasing in reporting of disasters around the world.
None of us are prepared to examine evidence ourselves & judge which experts are more reliable than others
Fortunately, there are formal & informal mechanisms which play this role
That’s the short cut
Such “short cuts” — which we can call science advisory mechanisms — generally (but importantly, not always) work well in contexts like climate & GMOs, but have for the most part failed miserably in the pandemic
I appreciate Prof Thompson's interest in my work, but he gets some things badly wrong, some thoughts
Prof Thompson certainly isn't the 1st academic to write about a colleague w/o reading their work or asking their views, hence
"He presumably thought..."
"His post was seen as..."
"Some critics question..."
How does this sort of uninformed speculation get published in a journal?
I hear this a lot:
"Witnessing professionals would do better to emphasize instead the long-term harms rather than getting involved in controversies about the causes of particular weather disasters."
IOW: "Your good science makes my political advocacy more difficult. Shut up."
Projecting Confidence: How the Probabilistic Horse Race Confuses and Demobilizes the Public | The Journal of Politics: Vol 82, No 4 journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108…
I discussed the pathological potential of horse race election predictions a little ways back