If I arranged marriages I wouldn't look for people similar on Big 5 traits or attractiveness — some things need to be matched and some complemented. Couples need to BOTH agree on 4 big topics, and have 4 important traits BETWEEN THEM.
1. Sexuality - style, frequency, etc. It may be hard to plan for the future but you at least want several good years during which you really learn to satisfy each other.
2. Children - not just how many (the answer is usually "one at a time") but also parenting style, division of labor, family involvement etc.
3. Lifestyle - rootless cosmopolitan or buy a house in a small town? Frugal or extravagant? Host parties or Netflix and chill?
4. Relationship dynamics - things like whether you hang out for hours every day or give each other a lot of space. I would include in this also questions of exclusivity, which isn't just a mono/poly binary. Are you OK with your partner seeing a movie with an opposite sex friend?
COMPLEMENTARY TRAITS — At least ONE of the people in the couple needs to:
1. Make money. The important thing is having skills that can reliably provide a stable income (e.g. a plumber), not just $ in the bank right now. Financial stress ruins couples — don't marry two academics!
2. Be emotionally stable. Be able to cool their own anger, dispel their own depression, etc. They may not always be able to help their partner, but you avoid the crisis when both spiral into anger or sadness simultaneously. "Codependency" is often just two neurotics marrying.
3. Be gregarious and extraverted. Like money, friends are an important currency that sustains any household and at least one of the people in the couple needs to be good at making new friends and bringing their spouse to new social circles. Two shut-ins is a no-no.
4. Be flexible and willing to compromise on the one of the big 4 topics of agreement, since the two people will often change their desires over time and may diverge.
Ideally, each person in the couple has to have at least 2 of big 4 traits. 3 and 3 makes for a great marriage. If you only have 1 you need to make up for it by being hotter than the other person, have a special talent, or be more hard-working on shared projects.
The above can be mixed and matched. I know a long-term polyamorous couple where the husband is stable and gregarious, the wife makes money and is hot, both are flexible, and they are on the same page on the big topics.
How are your own marriages scoring on my metrics?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Almost all single people I know who say that finding a partner is as important as their career spend 10x hours of effort on the latter. And of course, if all you can come with for dating is regurgitating the same takes in the same bars to the same people you won't enjoy it much.
But every date can be an opportunity to meet a new person with their own ideas and culture and background and reactions. And every date you can be someone slightly different, with different obsessions and ideas. A date is an intellectual open mic.
Hypothesis: late-modernist progressivish neoliberalism a la Obama is actually the best philosophy of governance possible today. Anything better for the population will be rejected, anything more popular will be worse.
This thought is mostly inspired by @mgurri's must-read book.
Gurri notes the failures of high modernist projects throughout the 20th C. (c.f. Seeing Like a State). At the dawn of the 21st, these failures aren't only obvious but impossible by governments and authorities to suppress in the decentralized information landscape of the internet.
These visible failures don't engender humility and lower expectations, they mostly engender nihilist antagonism as can be seen in every popular protest movement from 2011 till today. People simultaneously chant "The authorities are evil!" and "Please save us, o authorities!".
FUCK VICTIMHOOD IDENTITY, a passionate thread that should be a cool blog post but I have to get it off my chest right now.
1/12
If you follow me you’ve noticed that I don’t like talking about how the world has wronged me, oppressed me, discriminated against me, victimized me. If you assume that I’ve lived an entirely charmed life free of any hardship, you may need a refresher on the base rate fallacy.
The reality is that long ago I noticed that the less I saw and presented myself as a victim, the less I was victimized. This kicked off a virtuous cycle that I’m not going to jeopardize. Now my life is much improved, and I’ve developed a very strong allergy to victim identity.
Do you remember that time when 2 healthcare workers in a Korean long-term care hospital had COVID for two days and exposed 211 patients and colleagues and those people took hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic and none of them got COVID? Sounds relevant. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Wait, so you're saying the HCQ works if given before or right after infection, but not for very sick people? Yes. I told you so back in mid-April. HCQ likely works by slowing virus replication — that's not the issue for severely ill people.
- But HCQ is dangerous for your heart!
- Again, that's true mostly for those already very sick. Travelers to India often take HCQ daily for two months. Lupus patients take it daily for 20 years. It's COVID that mainly fucks with your heart, not HCQ. facebook.com/notes/ronald-e…
Comedians know that when you hear a good joke you usually laugh, but when you hear a *perfect* joke you sometimes just sit in stunned silence for a couple of seconds and then quietly say "that was very funny". This is a thread of me over-analyzing bits that made me do that.
The best absurd humor is tightly adjacent to banality. Every word in this tweet is perfect because you only have to change a word or two to turn this from a masterful joke into a perfectly bland statement.
Deadpan sarcasm is hard in speech, and is 100x harder in writing. You have to start from full credulity, lead the reader to the edge of the disbelief, and then give them the tiniest nudge. "Myriad" jolts you over by being just non-standard enough. Genius.
Good news, everyone, I figured it all out! Yes, all of it: free energy, the entropic brain, mental disorders, postmodernism, rationality, and psychedelics. Now y'all can wait a couple of weeks for me to write a careful post with links. Or, you can strap in for a manic tweetstorm.
When you go to the wiki page on free energy, you see weird formulas likes this. Free energy = surprise + divergence = complexity + accuracy. What in Friston's name does it all mean? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_ener…
Let's start with a simpler diagram: you have a cell/brain with an internal state "I". It receives sensory inputs "S" from the outside world, which are caused by some hidden state of the world "H". And the world can be affected through actions "A".