Amy Coney Barrett nomination begs the question -- are Americans allowed to disagree with the left?
In recent years, the hard-left has morphed from a political movement trying to persuade citizens to a religious movement bent on hunting heretics
foxnews.com/opinion/amy-co…
In recent years, the hard-left has morphed from a political movement trying to persuade citizens to a religious movement bent on hunting heretics
foxnews.com/opinion/amy-co…
Pro-Life? You hate women. Religious traditionalist? Homophobe. Dislike illegal immigration? Racist. Support welfare reform? Racist, again, and you hate the poor.
Do you like the Senate or the Electoral College, or stand during the national anthem? Probably a white supremacist.
Do you like the Senate or the Electoral College, or stand during the national anthem? Probably a white supremacist.
To the radical left, the whole point of the unaccountable power of the Supreme Court is to allow progressive Justices to impose their values on every business, church, school charity, city, county and state in the nation.
For all their rhetoric about “democracy,” progressives revere Supreme Court decisions that overturn or rewrite democratically passed laws according to their values.
They want to outlaw dissent, and forcibly convert the public to their One True Faith of Progressivism… or else.
They want to outlaw dissent, and forcibly convert the public to their One True Faith of Progressivism… or else.
Barrett's quaint view is that the Constitution protects rights of all & that Courts should be impartial referees, ensuring the law follows the Constitution & is enforced with justice.
Which is exactly why Americans of all creeds, races & political ideas need her on the bench.
Which is exactly why Americans of all creeds, races & political ideas need her on the bench.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
