Yeah! My "define originalism" suggestion got through!
Not hard at all @ChrisCoons that's exactly what Alabama, Mississippi, etc plan to do- pass state laws to challenge the right to privacy. Maybe not on contraceptives, but the doctrine of right to privacy
Correct @ChrisCoonsforDE - the right to privacy is what they want to come after bc it is what they mean when they talk about "judicial activism" or "legislating from the bench." So yes, post confirmation, on the future docket, the goal will be to organize, via ALEC, to start
pushing all kinds of news laws through their tri-fecta states that will be meant to chip away that the "penumbra of rights" jurisprudence. And THAT is how they can, eventually roll back civil rights
People expect it will all happen in a BAMM but no, its going to be a slow but pervasive chip away, and one that is strategically organized bc as she keeps pointing out "we can't just put issues in front of the Court!" Yeah, exactly, but Rep trifectas can. And they plan to

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel "The Doc" Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌

Rachel

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelBitecofer

15 Oct
The only message that would work w Reps & right-leaning Indies to get them to vote against Trump are ones that appeal to their own self-interest. That's why the '16 ads failed.

You have to make Rs fear for themselves- NOT the greater good.
I know that's hard to hear, but that's the truth. Liberals always want to make ads that speak to themselves. If policy mattered to non-voters, they'd be voters. If Rs cared about others- they'd be liberals.
To be clear-Rs care about (known) or same- tribe others. Just not other, others.
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct
1. Had a few of you ask me to respond to @Edsall's well-written & thought out column on less thought of aspects of the status of the election- here if you haven't read it. 1st- I want to remind you long-termers- for months, years, I've been talking about nytimes.com/2020/10/14/opi…
2. @parscale's strategy, his ONLY strategy since persuasion of Indies w Trump as your candidate is not an option, has been to hunt down, via social media, non-political white, working-class (men primarily) who share interests (hunting, Nascar, etc) w their voting WWC men but who
3. hadn't previously been voting- get them to register & then get them to turn out to vote. So this registration phenomenon in PA, WI, MI, etc, this is just that- coming to fruition. And if anything, these numbers are smaller than I feared they might reach though what makes them
Read 20 tweets
14 Oct
1. Anyone w meme-making/graphic skills & time for a "do a solid for democracy" should take the linked list in @marceelias's tweet below and make a meme that lists the process for each state's "notification" process on "rejected" ballots.

Or you could do just 1 for your state.
2. You could take this list, figure out how ballots get rejected and join a local org working to mitigate ballot rejection OR helping to inform voters they've been rejected.

This is a BIG problem for Ds & another reason I personally urge in-person voting as much as possible.
3. As you go through this list, you'll see the many error points that can cause rejection and data suggests that 1st time voters absentee/mail voters are MUCH more likely to have their votes disqualified. Between this, and Bill Barr's pre-announced strategy to try to prevent mail
Read 12 tweets
13 Oct
1. Senate GOPers want you to believe that Dems don't support religious nominees and/or take issue w the fact they are people of faith. Virtually every Dem is religious, (& overwhelmingly, Christain, just like the Reps). In the case of A.C.B.- the concerns are how religion impacts
2. here decision-making. This has ALWAYS been a concern, and sadly, especially for Catholics. It was a BIG DEAL when Kennedy became the 1st non-WASP elected. But people were concerned he'sd be a tool of the pope! In the case of A.C.B., the concerns are her view on gay marriage &
3. abortion. THAT is what Ds are attacking, but it is a good talking point to frame it as an attack on her Christianity- a common tool in the GOP's messaging toolkit and one the media is ALWAYS willing to take the bite on. Today, in terms of American politics, religious tests &
Read 4 tweets
12 Oct
1. All- over the past couple of years a few of you have mentioned creating a Patreon as a means of supporting my work. Up till now, my work has been supported via W-2 employment, but from here on out, I'd like to do it on my own. I hope to bring The Cycle to life as a political
2. analysis/commentary site featuring not only work from me, but from others and especially looking to elevate work from the under-rep'd mixed in w work from people y'all know & love. That stuff is in progress, the prototype/shell of the site is at least live now,
3. but will take some months to get rolling in the format of business. It's a brave, new world for me to divest myself from the safety of a W-2. But I want the freedom to do/say/research whatever I want & that is simply something you cannot get affiliated w an entity. I'm the
Read 11 tweets
12 Oct
1. I've noticed this too. And I have no doubt that A.C.B. both as a woman & devout Catholic felt pressured to have a large family. But I am grateful that she lived in an era where that obligation didn't deprive her "top of the class" brain the opp. to reach its full potential.
2. And I always wonder if women in her position ever stop to realize that "activist courts" that aren't "designed to right every wrong in our public life" are the KEY tool that allowed her to do it. That w/o the very type of jurisprudence she hates, she almost certainly couldn't
3. have achieved the remarkable achievements she has wrought from her life. And so, that means, if she brings a different kind of jurisprudence to the bench, that other people, other groups, and frankly, women, will be denied future opportunities. One of the GOP senators noted
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!