4) In both releases the name Dan Jones is being redacted under the auspices of "sources and methods". However, considering Dan Jones was a former SSCI staff, his redaction looks more akin to SSCI self-preservation.
5) The last interview of Bruce Ohr (May 15th, 2017) took place two days prior to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller. Throughout the interviews Bruce was acting as the go-between from his both his wife Nellie at F-GPS and Fusion’s contract agent Christopher Steele.
6) At least one of the interviews appears to be conducted by WFO FBI *Supervisory Special Agent Brian Dugan.
*The same agent who investigated the Wolfe/SSCI leaking.
7) The content of the thumb-drive given to Bruce by Nellie is discussed but not released. Why?
Possibility/Probability: The Nellie research will align almost identically with the content of the Dossier.
8) Such a revelation would be severely damaging to the FBI, DOJ and, by extension, the SSCI who have never revealed that origination issue.
9) "Damaging" in that current DOJ, FBI and SSCI members would have known for four years about the true provenance of Steele dossier material.
Therefore it is institutionally necessary to keep hidden.
FUBAR
/END
Release Nellie's Research File !!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FTA: "Those present included an FBI confidential source who recorded the meetings. The source has been paid $8,600.
“The group talked about creating a society that followed the U.S. Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient,” the FBI agent wrote."
FBI intercepted *thought crimes*. FTA: "“Fox referred to Governor Whitmer as ‘this tyrant b----,’ & stated, ‘I don’t know, boys, we gotta do something,” according to the court affidavit. “You guys link with me on our other location system, give me some ideas of what we can do.”
2. On its face the OIG release outlines a review and finding, actually a warning, by Horowitz’s office about FBI contractor access to “a certain national security database.”
3. The release is titled: “Management Advisory: Notification of Concerns Identified in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Contract Administration of a Certain Classified National Security Program”.
Worth remembering this statement from the day when IG Horowitz released his report on four FISA applications.
Also worth remembering there is an unknown letter from the DOJ, specifically including Durham requested guidance, that precipitated a response from FISA court presiding judge Boasberg.
We are looking at this in hindsight. The response from the FISC was dated June 25, 2020, so the request for opinion from the court was before June 25th.