1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Schedule to Confirm Barrett
Here is the likely timetable for the prospective confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
2) As is custom the committee is holding the nomination over for a week. The Judiciary Committee will again meet to consider Barrett’s nomination at 1 pm et on Thursday, October 22.
3) The committee will vote to send the nomination to the floor (technically the “calendar,” but that’s another story). A nominee does not have to have a “favorable” recommendation from the committee to go to the floor.
4) Robert Bork received an “unfavorable” recommendation from the committee in 1987 (and was defeated on the floor). Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was sent to the floor with “no recommendation” in 1991 before being confirmed.
5) The committee will need a simple majority vote to advance the nomination to the full Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced today he would put the nomination on the floor on Friday, October 23.
Here’s where it gets a little tricky.
6) If the committee finishes the nomination on October 22, the Senate can’t formally consider it until October 23. Keep in mind, that COULD begin at 12:00:01 am et Friday if McConnell really wants to hit the gas pedal.
7) McConnell must move to shift the Senate into executive session (versus legislative session) to specifically consider the Barrett nomination. Such a process likely requires a vote – but is not debatable (subject to a filibuster).
8) That vote could be by roll call, a voice vote or by unanimous consent (so long as there is no objection by any senator). Democrats could create some mischief at this stage by not having a quorum present or demanding a quorum be present – but not helping constitute a quorum.
9) This step to go to executive session requires a simple majority. And once the Senate is in executive session for Barrett, the Clerk “reports” (reads aloud) the nomination before this Senate.
10) There is no “motion to proceed” on this type of nomination, based on a precedent set in the late 1970s by the late Senate MajLdr Byrd Thus, there is no way Dems could filibuster just starting debate on the nomination. However, Democrats could try to filibuster on the back end
11) At this stage, McConnell could file cloture to curb debate and overcome a filibuster. McConnell COULD do this as early as Friday, October 23.
12) Regardless of when McConnell files cloture, by rule, the “cloture petition” (to end debate on the nomination) ripens for a vote after an intervening day.
13) So, if McConnell files cloture to end debate on Friday, October 23, Saturday, October 24 is the intervening day. The cloture petition would ripen on Sunday, October 25.
14) By rule, the Senate can begin voting to end debate on the nomination one hour after the Senate meets, following the intervening day. Again, if they really want to hit the gas, this COULD happen at 1 am et on Sunday October 25.
15) But…we don’t know that they will move that expeditiously. It’s more likely the Senate votes to end debate on the nomination on Monday, October 26 or later in the week.
16) Under the provisions of “Nuclear Option II,” (where McConnell established a new precedent - not a rules change - lowering the bar to end a filibuster on Supreme Court nominations from 60 votes to 51 to confirm Justice Neil Gorsuch).....
17)....the Senate would vote to end debate on the nomination. That entails a simple majority. Once cloture on the nomination is “invoked” (halting a filibuster), debate is then limited to 30 hours.
18) Once 30 hours have expired, the Senate may take an up or down vote on the nomination itself. It only needs 51 votes to confirm Barrett.
19) That’s why we believe the actual confirmation of Barrett won’t happen until the middle of end of the week of October 25. Likely sometime between October 28-30.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) It is customary in the Judiciary Committee to “hold over” a Supreme Court nominee for a week after the initial “markup” session.
2) Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has scheduled that markup session for tomorrow. But at the close of confirmation hearing for Amy Coney Barrett, Graham noted that the committee will “hold the nomination over” for a week.
3) That means there will likely (likely) be discussion tomorrow of the Barrett nomination at the business meeting. But the committee effectively punts the actual “markup” (where the committee votes to send the nomination to the floor) until Thursday, October 22.
1) The Judiciary Cmte has now had 2 significant delays due to audio issues. This COULD create a domino effect as it pertains to the timing of her potential confirmation.
2) There’s nothing that says they have to record the hearing or have amplified audio in the hearing room or for media/public.
3) But this is complicated by the fact that for the pandemic, some senators are beaming in remotely. Plus, in order to keep the numbers lower in the room, some senators are listening/watching the hearing back in their offices.
1) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Stacy Staggs, a mother of 7-year old twins. Stacy’s twins have multiple pre-existing conditions due to their premature birth and rely on the Affordable Care Act’s protections.
2) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Dr. Farhan Bhatti, a family physician and CEO of Care Free Medical. Will discuss impacts to patients if the Supreme Court overturns the Affordable Care Act.
3) Feinstein witnesses for Day 4 of Barrett hrng: Crystal Good who pushed to obtain an abortion at age 16
1) It’s like opposite day on a potential coronavirus bill. Or the Twilight Zone.
Nothing makes sense right now.
2) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) have different problems. McConnell has a conference which either doesn’t want to do another coronavirus bill – or wants to do the bare minimum.
3) But McConnell’s putting a narrow coronavirus bill on the floor next week. Pelosi has a caucus which wants to do another coronavirus bill. But Pelosi isn’t budging.
1) Just a few days ago, President Trump declared an end to coronavirus talks. But the talks kept going – despite the President’s admonition. President Trump also said there would not be an effort to do a coronavirus bill until after the election.
2) then the President abruptly switched course. Mr. Trump also said he asked Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to focus instead on confirming Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
3) Now McConnell says the Senate will attempt to tackle some sort of “targeted” coronavirus bill sometime after October 19, but before they put the Barrett nomination on the floor toward the end of the month.
A) 2020 election tactics are on display at Barrett's confirmation hearing.
B) Senate Republicans are repeatedly blasting Democrats for attacking Barrett’s faith. This stems from questions and reservations Democrats posed to Barrett when she was nominated for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017.
C) Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee proclaimed “the dogma lives loudly within you” at the 2017 hearing.