YouTube Qanon purge is here.

It is appalling that now YouTube has taken down channels, like @99freemind, who just research various sources, share info, and draw sometimes wild (sometimes correct) inferences.

If it’s not libel, they should be free to speak their minds, period.
Here’s what I believe about free speech.

This used to be the “liberal” view. Well, it still is. It’s just that the so-called liberals have become so illiberal.

larrysanger.org/2019/05/a-free…
The good news is that you can still find Polly and others on Bitchute.com. I’ll be visiting them more now.
I give my accounts two years. Very possibly less.
By the way, if you want my take about how we got here, read chapter 12:

Paperback: amazon.com/Essays-Free-Kn…

Ebook: gumroad.com/lsanger#LFUIT

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Larry Sanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lsanger

16 Oct
1/ Let me "fact-check" the very idea of fact-checking.

I have great contempt for fact-checkers. Here's why.

When people claim to do a fact-check of some claim, what they purport to do is to test it against objective evidence in order to determine whether it is true.
2/ The problem is that the claims they are "fact-checking" are usually ambiguous: they are open to many interpretations. It's easy to show a claim to be false; you merely have to pick an interpretation according to which it is false. That is usually not hard.
3/ Among academics who pride themselves on their intellectual fairness, there is a basic principle, the principle of "charity," according to which you choose an interpretation of your opponent's claim based on which possible interpretation is most likely to be true.
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
Let me break down the Hunter Biden situation for you a bit.

Source: web.archive.org/web/2020101417…

1/ Background: Joe Biden said his son had never spoken to him about his crazily lucrative job with Burisma—which was very unlikely, since Biden was Obama's Ukraine point man.
2/ Now we have a copy of an April 2015 email from Burisma adviser, a Vadym Pozharskyi, to Hunter Biden, saying, "thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father..."
3/ A May 2014 mail from Pozharskyi to Hunter requested the younger Biden's "advice on how you could use your influence."

So not only did Biden meet Pozharski, it seems to have been in response to an earlier request for Hunter to use his "influence."
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
It's potentially harmful, all right, @Twitter. It's harmful to your favored candidate's chances of re-election. And that's the *only* reason you're blocking it.

But good luck avoiding the Streisand Effect with this one. Image
If you're confused about what this is all about, expand the image and look at the blue-colored message at the bottom.
It seems this Post article hasn't been blocked by @Twitter yet. Come on, Twitter, keep up! You gotta keep whacking the moles!

Unfortunately, it looks like your lawn is completely shot.

nypost.com/2020/10/14/sen…
Read 9 tweets
11 Oct
Cardi B is having a birthday today!

So, look at the lovely thing @AtlanticRecords put out about her on Twitter. Just kidding. It's nauseating.

Think this is a responsible corporation after an honest dollar? That's all? Really?

NSFW!
"There's some whores in this house" indeed. And Cardi B isn't the only one: Atlantic execs are much worse. She's just their product.

This is beyond corrupting. It's shockingly repulsive.

And it's advertising used by Atlantic. They're becoming billionaires on this sort of thing.
"Who said pu$$y can't take you to the top!" screams the video in gold lettering.

What exactly are they selling here? Not just Cardi B's music. They're selling a way of life.

Why? Because it's what's popular?

No. It wouldn't be nearly so popular if they weren't doing this.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
1/ I enjoy two things,
(1) that once- and still-maligned (as “far right”) new journalism sources are breaking many important stories, and
(2) that the MSM is constantly being humiliated as their falsehoods are exposed.

This is a true media revolution, happening quietly.
2/ It is true that people still in thrall to the MSM have little clue about this. But their numbers dwindle daily. Cry, “advocacy journalists,” cry.

And as their influence wanes, more and more unlikely-seeming allies of the once “right”—now, just “Americans”—show up, awakened.
3/ As much as social media has been corrupted, the power of crowdsourcing is still responsible for much of this revolution. So many stories break now on Twitter, blogs, and other popular sources.

The media class qua mediators are less necessary today.
Read 9 tweets
11 Oct
Shocked I am—shocked!—that it was not, in fact, “white supremacists” who plotted a Gov. Whitmer kidnapping.

One attended a BLM protest; one called Trump a “tyrant.”

The MSM prove themselves over and over to be bald-faced liars—irrational & desperate.

zerohedge.com/political/whit…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!