The Q’s come from 6 groups experienced with PDX policing issues.
Below are responses to a Q about historic, criminal PPB police violence at protests.
(L, Mapps; R, Eudaly)
Mapps GIVES COPS A FREE PASS. Eudaly shows her usual commitment to addressing police at their level.
2/
“Does Mapps give them a free pass?”
Yes!
Mapps “opposes rubber bullets”??
Meaningless!
Mapps says PPB “should protect civil rights”.. they haven’t done this in 4+ mos!!
PPA and Mapps know they will work well together: Mapps says empty things, PPA wins. $15k well spent.
3/
While Mingus Mapps says empty things about the police force which he took $15,000 from,
Commissioner @Chloe4PDX is strong, informed and direct on opposing police violence at protests, like she is on many questions around policing.
4/
On Houseless persons and the police:
Eudaly notes the Police Union is delaying every effort to get Portland Street Response going
Mapps - who took money from his apparent allies at PPA - neglects to mention this (cont...)
Question ⬇️
A: Mapps top, Eudaly below ↘️
5/
Mapps on homelessness/police:
Mapps, who is apparently fun to talk to, says things that sound good to people who don’t know the issue and dynamics.
He DESCRIBES the problem in a nice sounding way, but he indicates an offer of a FREE PASS to police who do a LOT of harm.
6/
On homelessness/police, Mapps says “let’s do Portland Street Response.”
YEAH, no kidding, that’s already being done, and Mapps’ campaign friends (The Portland Police Association) are deliberately gumming up the process however they can, which Eudaly notes (below).
7/
WHY is PPA gumming up Portland Street Response?
Because they “want police out of dealing w homelessness” (Mingus’ language), BUT they want new PSR employees IN THE POLICE UNION MURDER PROTECTION RACKET. They’ve forced the city to make concessions to extract those employees.
8/
Do read thru the rest of Mingus Mapps’ empty answers, and @Chloe4PDX’s aggressive, substantial answers.
How would Mingus affect policing policy?
He’ll consistently drag down efforts from Hardesty or Iannarone, by adopting police stances and laundering them to the public.
9/
Speaking of @sarah2020, she actually filled out the survey, the only of 3 mayor candidates. Her answers are aggressive, practical, and substantial.
Sarah Iannarone has pledged to give Hardesty the PPB Bureau, a move the police reject (and Wheeler refuses). More...
10/
Iannarone would be in the Mayor’s seat, and has a big role in setting the discourse on issues of police using violence and force.
Her answers largely indicate she’d immediately work to politically set up prevention and solution to police corruption and harm. (cont..)
11/
On complex issues like JTTF, Iannarone knows what she’s talking about and gives a practical, BLM-friendly answer.
The cops’ friends - Mapps and Mayor Wheeler - oppose Iannarone’s position, though she is both RIGHT, and also more practical.
12/
On racial profiling by notoriously racist and violent PPB, Mapps says we need different stats, pushes back on criticism of Gang Team. A common “cops can do whatever they want” reformist take
Iannarone says smart, practical things AND calls for HONEST reckoning, which cops reject
In Portland and OR, a politician doesn’t have to say much on policing to sound good to everyday people.
The system is set up for spineless reformists to get into office and limit any real change, advance police lobbyist demands. i.e. Mapps saying “I want to ban chokeholds”.
14/
Both Eudaly and Iannarone’s answers indicate they actually want to get something done to stop these corrupt and violent cops from doing harm.
So, both women are under serious attack from the police and their allies like Wheeler, media, Business Alliance reactionaries and Mapps
If you’re an agent for defending police control, you call Iannarone and Eudaly “divisive” women.
Eudaly and Iannarone understand the issue, then propose real action. Police + big business lobby and fund people like Wheeler and Mapps to make inaction sound just and practical
16/
Why did Mapps take $15k from the PPA police “union” murder protection racket?
Based on his answers, he took it bc he agrees, deep down, with their arguments/rationalizations, and will generally act as PPA ally in beating back legit BLM/abolitionist demands around policing.
17/
Why does PPA invest $15k in Mingus Mapps?
Because they know it could be EXTREMELY valuable to them to get rid of Eudaly - a smart, biting hater of lying policeMEN - on the council and replace w a very clever ideological ally.
The answers from both bear out the wise investment.
For what?
To put and end to the harm from racist policing.
We’re not interested in the mayor’s lies. Portlanders want action now. Money out of PPB!!
[image 1: Drawing of cop in riot gear holding a crowd control munitions gun. On the top right it reads: “Invest in safety and care now. Defund police. Rally October 24 4:40PM Pioneer Courthouse Square.” Below that it reads: “Community Demands for the Fall Budget:..
2/
continued.. End Militarized & Surveillance Units, Fire Violent Cops and Freeze All Hiring, Ban Crowd Control Munitions, No Overtime for Cops, Participatory Budgeting for Community Care”]
3/
Oh hey, was just flipping through the hundreds of pages the Mayor released saying why we need to tighten our belts on the backs of city workers (otherwise known as the Mayor's proposed budget) and we found some quick resources for the city that the Mayor must have missed 👉
Boom! 1️⃣ found $6,007,842 for you, by disbanding the Gun Violence Reduction Team and ending the racist outcomes that their team has had for decades on black and brown community members.
2️⃣ (you're going to love this one) there's $4,357,372 that is today going to the Transit Police. Have you been paying attention this year?! We're going to get free transit, making the demeaning and discouraging presence of armed officers totally unnecessary.