[Thread] 1/ Thought it would be useful to examine e-bile/digital misogyny on Twitter, so I looked at how many people had called Congresswoman @IlhanMN four common gendered pejoratives "sl*t, b*tch, c*nt, and wh*re" between now and November 2018. The results are shocking.
2/ The scraping of tweets resulted in around 3,089 individual tweets containing insults. Bitch was the most common slur, representing around 82% of the tweets, followed by wh*re (7%), c*nt (6%) and sl*t (4%).
3/ the time series graph below shows that every month there is a variation in the amount of abuse. Presumably this volatility reflects certain political events. It is interesting to note that the distribution of insults changes temporarily in August, Sept and October 2019..
4/ It was in August 2019 that Ilhan was reported to be having an affair with political consultant Tim Mynett. While b*itch is still the most common slur, the explicit terms implying Omar's promiscuity "sl*t" and "wh*re" increased significant as a percentage of insults
5/ So in case you think Twitter didn't have a digital misogyny problem, here is a good example of it. Note: this data does not include the *presumably* many accounts that have been deleted or suspended for abuse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Thread] 1 Here are some of the biggest verified tweeters on the "Hillary Emails" trend yesterday, where some entity thought they'd create a buzz around five year old legitimate data dump immediately following Pompeo's announcement that all Hillary emails would be leaked. Some of
2/ the usual superspreaders are here, namely @alshaikh2 and @monther72@halgawi etc. (previous graph is by the people who generally tweeted a lot on the hashtag). Below nodes sized by most retweeted. @Forsan_UAE making a strong show. Definitely a joint Emirate/Saudi effort here
3/ This is just a brief visualisation for my own notes. Starting to wonder if there should be a new category for fake news - "old news repurposed and reimagined as a new scoop with frequent misrepresentation of facts" #disinformation
The results of the Ipsos MORI survey cited in the Fox News piece (irrelevantly) was commissioned by Cornerstone Global Associates - although this was not mentioned in the Fox News piece (thanks @anthonyjwells ) for pointing this out. As Anthony also points out, it probably
looks more credible to not highlight the fact that the poll itself was commissioned by the think tank whose report was the basis for the article itself, and whose director invoked England as being a good place to host the world cup. Instead, the Fox News piece links to a Sun
Newspaper report on the poll. The Sun article does not mention the poll was commissioned by Cornerstone Global - a good example of 'laundering' a source. One could excuse this as normal practise, but given that the article seems to be written in bad faith, and that the citation
[Thread] This article should is an exemplar of bad journalism: 1) JOURNALIST BACKGROUND - the writer Ben Weinthal works for a think tank that has hosted an anti-Qatar conference and whose senior members are chummy with the UAE Ambassador in the US.
The same journalist routinely harasses academics and journalists on Twitter who live in Qatar 2) SOURCING - It cites a report by the firm Cornerstone Global's whose director, Ghanem Nuseibeh is related to the UAE's Ambassador to the UN, and who previously offered to do PR for
Qatar. A previous Cornerstone report initially cited uncritically by the BBC was softened after Cornerstone's credibility on the Gulf Crisis and World Cup was called into question
3 ) VERIFICATION. No attempts are made to verify the claims of the report,it's accepted uncritically
This Newsweek article is based on a report produced by Impact SE- whose board includes a former Israeli Ambassador, a former FDD member, a member of AIPAC. Most of their reports have focused on Palestine and Muslim majority countries. They did a report on Saudi, which found
a lot of evidence of anti semitism in the curriculum which has been widely discussed. It has also done a report on the UAE - which was not a curriculum review but rather a focus on the UAE's moral education program - far more limited and does not mention anti semitism. It is
Interesting that both the UAE and Qatar report come out at the time of UAEs normalization with Israel. The report on UAE while preliminary and limited positions the UAE as a regional leader on textbook reform. Not quite sure how this could be determined without a review of other
[Thread] This is outrageous: "UAE-owned Sky News Arabia removes 'Palestine' from interview backdrop" - middleeastmonitor.com/20200921-uae-o… However, it's not the only time @skynewsarabia have engaged in blatant disinformation and provocation. See following >
2/ Much of this relates to the skynewsarabia presented @a_albander . In May, he stoked fears of a fake coup in Qatar, posting debunked doctored videos of gunfire and screenshots of a flight radar [not] showing warplanes in Qatar
3/ and @a_albander also spread fake news that the WTO had ruled in favour of Saudi Arabia in their ruling about whether Saudi had failed to stop the industrial level piracy of @beINSPORTS_EN
Does anyone remember being in the Gulf during 1990/91 War. One of my earliest memories is waking up to hear the sound of scud missiles landing in Bahrain. I remember my parents running into mine and my brother's bedroom (i was 5) to comfort us and hearing a massive explosion
It apparently happened a few times but I remember that night, perhaps because it felt so close. I remember the masking tape crosses on the windows, the air raid sirens and leaving the TV on for a scud warning. I also remember soldiers coming to our town hall to hand out gas masks
and water filtration kits. I dont recall knowing how to use the flasks but I always cried when I put my gas mask on. It was like a thick plastic bag and i could see the red everready batteries in the mechanism. We also were told to hide under our desks if there was a scud