Shamelessly misquoting the article—even includes a screenshot in the very same tweet—and yet this #disinformation spreads like crazy. 🤦♂️
On the IFR of COVID-19 and a newly published article on the WHO Bulletin.
Full version here: who.int/bulletin/onlin…
On the IFR of COVID-19 and a newly published article on the WHO Bulletin.
Full version here: who.int/bulletin/onlin…
Instead, I recommend you to read this proper thread on this article. ⬇️
https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1316511734115385344
... which basically summarizes a better estimate for the IFR to be ~ 0.50%, double the figure of the article and more than ten-folded as claimed in the tweet going viral.
https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1316511787798261760
Just another 'Q' & 🐸-tweep—why am I not surprised? 😒😅
Special take for my fellow Dutchies—the same report claims an IFR of nearly 0,70% for The Netherlands. ⬇️
https://twitter.com/mkeulemans/status/1317757232105328640?s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
