2. Fakhr al-Islām Abu’l Ĥasan Álī ibn Muĥammad ibn al-Ĥusayn ibn Ábd al-Karīm al-Bazdawī [Pazdawī] al-Nasafī al-Ĥanafī [d. 482 AH / 1089 CE] writes in his Uşūl al-Dīn:
“The Ahl al-Sunnah said: Karāmāt of the Awliyā’a are true.
The Mútazilah and the Qadariyyah said:
Karāmāt of the Awliyā’a are false, not possible. A Karāmah, if Allāh táālā manifests at the hand of a Walī from among the Awliyā’a, is something that goes against the norm. Such as a person going from Bukhārah to Makkah in a single night, or walking upon the surface of the water
without a boat, or there appears for him wealth without working or earning; not from himself or from another person.
Their doubt: If this was possible then it leads to nullifying of Mújizahs; thus it leads to nullifying of Risālah. For the evidence of the truthfulness of the
Messengers is not except Mújizahs, and Mújizahs are what manifest at their hands out of what goes against the norm. Thus, if it were possible for this to manifest at the hands of other than them, there would not be any proof left for their truthfulness, and that is false, thus
it is appropriate that it is not possible just as it is not possible for a Mújizah to manifest at the hands of a false claimant to Prophethood.
The reason for the saying of the general Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l Jamāáh: The manifestation of Karāmāt at the hand the Awliyā’a of Allāh
táālā is witnessed, for indeed Allāh táālā mentioned in His Book the report of Āşif, the Wazīr of Sulaymān عليه السلام, that he came with the Kursī of Bilqīs from many miles in the blink of an eye. Allāh táālā said, Said one who had knowledge of the Book, “I will bring it in
your majesty’s presence before you bat your eyelid”; then when he saw it set in his presence, he said, “This is of the favours of my Lord. The exegetes have agreed that the one who had knowledge of the Book was Āşif ibn Barakhiyya, and similarly there has manifested what goes
against the norm at the hands of many people, from the time Allāh táālā created the world until this time of ours. Indeed, there has manifested similar to this in different ages.”
He further writes:
“In the Hadīth of Úmar رضي الله عنه where he said, ‘O Sāriyah! The mountain!’,
and between him and Sāriyah was many miles, close to fifty parasangs. Sāriyah heard the voice of Úmar, thus whoever rejects this then indeed he has rejected what is witnessed, and so he follows the Sophists.
As for their objection then it is not a [valid] objection, for indeed a
Karāmah manifests without a claim [of Risālah], and a Mújizah manifests following a claim, thus it does not necessitate the nullification of Mújizahs. Also, a Karāmah manifests at the hand of the Walī when he is following the Rasūl, because the Karāmah that manifests for him is
a Mújizah of the Rasūl, and by this Mújizahs are not nullified. As opposed to the false claimant of Prophethood, for if Mújizahs manifested at his hands, then that would lead to nullification of Mújizahs.”
3. Imām Najmuddīn Abū Ĥafş Úmar ibn Muĥammad al-Nasafī al-Ĥanafī [461-537 AH / 1068-1142 CE] writes in Áqīdah al-Nasafiyyah:
“And the Karāmāt of the Awliyā’a are true. Thus, a Karāmah of manifests by going against the norm for the Walī. Among traversing a long distance in a
short span of time, and the appearance of food, drink and clothes when needed, and walking upon water, and flying in the air, and the speech of the inanimate and the beasts, and other things besides that. That is a Mújizah for the Rasūl, the one who manifested this Karāmah for
one among his Ummah, because it is manifested by it that he is a Walī, and he does not become a Walī except if he is correct in his belief, and his belief is an admission by the tongue and an affirmation in the heart of the Messengerhood of His Rasūl.”
4. Imām Sirājuddīn Abu’l Ĥasan Álī ibn Úthmān ibn Muĥammad ibn Sulaymān al-Taymiyy al-Farghānī al-Uūshī al-Ĥanafī [d. 575 AH / 1179 CE] writes in Bad’ al-Amālī:
“Karāmāt of a Walī, in this world
Have a basis, and they are the benevolent folk.”
“Karāmāt of the Awliyā’a are possible according to us, as opposed to the Mútazilah, and similarly magic and the evil eye are certain according to us as
opposed to them. Our proof in that is from the texts and the intellect.
As for the texts, then it is what Allāh táālā informed regarding the companion of Sulaymān, that he came with the throne of Bilqīs from a far distance in a short amount of time, as Allāh táālā said,
informing about him, “I will bring it in your majesty’s presence before you bat your eyelid”; then when he saw it set in his presence’. Similarly, Sāriyah, whilst he was in Nahāwand, heard the saying of Úmar رضي الله عنه whilst he was in Madīnah, ‘O Sāriyah! The mountain!’,
and between them both was a distance greater than fifty parasangs, and the flowing of the Nile by the letter of Úmar رضي الله عنه, and the drinking of poison by Khālid ibn al-Walīd is famous, and similarly what has been transmitted from the Karāmāt of the Tābiýīn and the
righteous of this Ummah has reached such an extent that if the singular reports were gathered they would reach the level of Tawātur in the possibility of Karāmah.
As for the intellect, then it is an act of Allāh táālā contrary to the flowing of the norm, so that the slave may
recognise the fruit of obedience and increase his insight by the correctness of his Dīn.
If it is said: If the Karāmah manifests at this level then it would resemble the Mújizah, and so a Nabī would not be told apart from a Walī.
We say: It is not like this, for indeed the
Mújizah is coupled with the claim of Prophethood, and if a Walī claimed that he has committed Kufr and he does not remain suitable for Karāmah, rather he is called a Walī due to following the Nabī عليه السلام. Thus, there is no harm in every Karāmah being a Mújizah of the Nabī,
the one whom his follower is called a Walī, and so no similarity occurs.”
6. Şadru’sh Sharīáh Mawlānā Amjad Álī al-Aáżamī al-Ĥanafī [1293-1367 AH / 1876-1948 CE] wrote in Bahār e Sharīát:
“Karāmat-e-Awliyā’a are true, the one who rejects this is misguided.
To bring the dead to life, to heal the one born blind and the leper, to transverse the whole
earth from east to west in one step, in short, all things that go against the norm are possible for the Awliyā’a, except that Mújizah which has been proven impossible for others. Such as bringing a Sūrat similar to the Qur’ān-e-Majīd, or to have Vision of Allāh in this world in a
state of wakefulness, or to be honoured with Kalām-e-Ĥaqīqī, whoever claims this for himself or for a Walī is a Kāfir.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imām Abū Ábdullāh Muĥammad ibn Saýīd al-Būşīrī al-Shādhilī [608-696 AH / 1213-1295 CE] devoted the fourth chapter of his poem to the Mawlid of RasūlAllāh ﷺ. This makes clear that the mention of Mawlid is an ancient practice of our scholars.
He writes:
“His noble birth [Mawlid] did reveal the purity of his roots.
How pure the outset of them as well as finality!
A day the Persians perceived that they indeed had been warned
if the husband and the Walī agree upon something that will not cause harm to the Şaghīrah girl, then that may be done. If they disagree, then Aĥmad and Abū Úbayd said that once a girl reaches the age of nine [lunar years] then the marriage may be consummated without her
consent, but that does not apply in the case of who is younger. Mālik, Shāfiýī and Abū Ĥanīfah said that the marriage may be consummated when the girl is able for intercourse, which varies from one girl to another, so no age limit can be set. This is the correct view;
Deobandis present themselves as traditional Sunni Ĥanafīs to the world and present the deceptive book Muhannad, written by Khalīl Aĥmad Ambethwi [1269-1346 AH / 1852-1927 CE] in order to prove they agree with the beliefs and practices of the Sunnis.
In this book their scholar claims to permit Mawlid however it is known that Deobandis scorn and ridicule celebration of Mawlids.
This is the defining characteristic of Deobandis – they have a book, an áqīdah and a fatwā for all seasons. When they meet Sunni scholars outside the
subcontinent, they claim that their áqīdah is described in Muhannad; but in their fatāwā and Urdu books, they scorn those very things as bidáh or shirk.
Let us now look to the Urdu writings of the Deobandis regarding Mawlid and standing in reverence, qiyām, during them.
Mujaddid Alf Thānī Imām Rabbānī Aĥmad ibn Ábdu'l Aĥad al-Fārūqī al-Sirhindī al-Naqshbandī al-Ĥanafī [971-1034 AH / 1564-1634 CE] writes in one of his Maktūbāt regarding necessary guidelines for women and on the meaning of the verse,
“O Prophet! If Muslim women com to you to take oath of allegiance that they will neither ascribe any partner to Allāh, nor steal, nor commit adultery, nor kill their children,
nor bring the lie that they carry between their hands and feet, nor disobey you in any rightful matter - then accept their allegiance and seek forgiveness from Allāh for them; indeed Allāh is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
“If you ask them, [why they said so] they will reply, ‘We were jesting and were being playful.’ Tell them: ‘Do you make fun of Allāh táālā, His verses and His Messenger?’ Do not proffer excuses –
you have disbelieved after having professed faith.”
[Tawbah, 9:65-66]
Imam Yaĥyā Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī al-Shāfiýī [631-676 AH / 1233-1277 CE] writes in Minhāju’t Ţālibīn:
“[Among] actions that cause apostasy: any deliberate action which explicitly mocks religion.”
Imām Ibn Áābidīn al-Ĥanafī al-Shāmī [1198-1252 AH / 1784-1836 CE] writes in Radd al-Muĥtār:
“I say: It is obvious that if the indicators of mockery or slighting [religion] are found, that person will be ruled
kāfir; even if he has not intended to mock or slight [the religion].”
Imām Muĥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ţabarī [224-310 AH / 839-923 CE] records in his Tafsīr:
Narrated from Ibn Ábbās regarding, ‘and not to reveal their adornment except to their own husbands’ until His saying, ‘women’s nakedness’, he said:
“The adornment that she reveals to these are her earrings, her necklace and her bangles. As for her anklets, her armlets, her upper chest and her hair, then she does not reveal this except to her husband.”