The Metropolitan Police has decided not to routinely release bodycam video footage after internal reviews showed officers displaying "poor communication, a lack of patience, a lack of de-escalation before use of force is introduced" theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/o…
On one level this is almost funny, where it not for the real-world outcomes in so many instances: racial profiling, unjustifiable or simply unlawful arrests, violent restraint, the misuse of Taser and CS, all with little chance that complaints are taken seriously
The police say the "release of BWV is highly likely to exacerbate not prevent ‘trial by social media’ and increase media interest in an incident." What they call "trial by social media" is also called accountability. It led to this officer facing trial bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
This tweet has kind of taken off so if you're not already familiar with Netpol's work, just to let you know we have a 36-page report on the policing of this summer's #BlackLivesMatter protests coming out in the next few weeks... stay tuned
A reminder that filming the police ourselves, in every interactions with them, is probably our only route to greater accountability. Here's some tips netpol.org/resources/film…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: A lot of people have been asking us what they can do to support #BlackLivesMatter.
Police systematically target black people with stop & search - so much so that in London black people are 4 times more likely to be stop & searched than white people. #BLMLDN
Many of those killed by the police in the UK were done so after a stop & search.
We've revised our guidance on filming the police during stop & search.
This is really odd. Staff at the Addenbrookes NHS Trust have been advised that @CambsCops are stopping staff on their way to work and telling them NHS ID was insufficient evidence of essential travel.
According to an email we have seen, the Trust has been forced to remind their local force that such an explanation together with an NHS ID badge is sufficient evidence.
This was the same force that was required to apologise for this only yesterday
Counter-terrorism police list that included Extinction Rebellion was shared across government, not just by the regional police unit in the south-east theguardian.com/environment/20…
Initially, counter-terrorism police said this document an “error of judgment” and “was produced at a local level”. This was a lie.
It was sent to the Home Office, Department for Education, NHS England, MOD, HM Prison Service, Probation Service, Ofsted and 20 local authorities
These include Milton Keynes, Slough, Bracknell Forest, Reading, Wokingham, West Berkshire, Windsor and Maidenhead, Southampton, Portsmouth, the Isle Of Wight, Brighton and Hove, Medway, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire, Surrey, Hampshire, East Sussex, West Sussex and Kent.
Coming fittingly after our call-out to @XRebellionUK rebels to tell us about the policing of the October Rebellion, this essential new report completely validates everything Netpol has been saying for five years about the oppressive policing of anti-fracking protests
It highlights how police leaders have sought to define what constitutes "acceptable" protests and how protesters have reported experiences of violence, intimidation and aggression from police officers at multiple fracking sites across the country
It also sets out how police's claim that they're ‘stuck in the middle’ between competing demands from protesters and fracking companies is rejected by campaigners who see a failure by police to fulfil their obligation to protect protesters’ rights and facilitate peaceful protest
At Court 5 in the Royal Courts of Justice this morning for the #ExtinctionRebellion judicial review (brought by @GreenJennyJones and others) of the Metropolitan Police's blanket use of section 14 restrictions on protest in London last week
The applicants for judicial review are represented by Netpol Lawyers Group member @BindmansLLP and their barristers are Phillipa Kaufman from @matrixchambers and Jude Bunting from @DoughtyStPublic
Philippa Kaufmann: this is about identifying what the section 14 applied to and whether the exercise of the power was ultra vires and in the way it was used, wholly unpredictable