Today's 5th Circuit decision on Texas absentee voting calls right to vote by mail a "privilege" several times.

What happened to the constitutional right to vote?

(Hint: it's supremely devalued by narrow fed court rulings that unduly defer to states.) assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7245…
Reading this opinion makes is abundantly clear that this court does not believe there is a fundamental, individual right to vote enshrined within the U.S. Constitution. The court rejects all claims of a burden on individual voters.
Shorter 5th Circuit: your ballot may be thrown out for a signature mismatch, but too bad so sad, it doesn't matter that you've lost your right to vote!
The harm done in Crawford, the 2008 voter ID case, is immeasurable. Courts are using that case not only to uphold stricter and stricter photo ID laws but also to uphold basically any regulation of the voting process in the name of generic "election integrity" concerns.
🚨5th Cir: "It is well established that the electoral process poses a risk of fraud."

Well established by whom? Where's the evidence?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Douglas

Josh Douglas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoshuaADouglas

19 Oct
THREAD on #SCOTUS 4-4 decision refusing to intervene in Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision. It's a BIG deal.

Normally, the U.S. Supreme Court won't hear cases from state courts about state law. This decision was under PA state constitution's protection for right to vote. 1/
The PA Supreme Court had extended absentee ballot deadline due to pandemic, saying the PA Constitution's "free and equal" clause required expanded voter access.

That should have ended the matter. 2/
But PA Republicans argued that the PA Supreme Court's decision altered the "manner" of running elections under Art. I, Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which lets state "legislatures" determine the "times, places, and manner" of holding elections. 3/
Read 16 tweets
19 Oct
THREAD: How many times have federal appellate courts unduly deferred to state legislatures or election officials in recent days, rejecting challenges and failing to uphold the constitutional right to vote? Let us count. 1/
3rd Circuit, rejecting challenge to Pennsylvania’s signature requirement for candidates to appear on the ballot. 2/

dropbox.com/s/pu0nyi55akpq…
5th Cir., reversing a district court order that had rejected Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s directive to allow only one ballot drop off location per county. 3/

dropbox.com/s/wrry82ksbi1j…
Read 16 tweets
13 Oct
BREAKING: 5th Cir. upholds Texas having only one ballot drop box per county.

Implausibly, the court finds that the Tex. Gov's decision *expands* the right to vote instead of *restricts* it.

Up is down.

Here is the opinion: ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/2…
Pay attention to this footnote. It's a continued attack on the ability of the U.S. Constitution to vigorously protect the right to vote, suggesting that laws that direct the voting process aren't actually about the "right to vote."
It is just so disingenuous for the court to argue that the Texas Gov's Oct 1 order, which explicitly forbid counties to use more than one drop box after several counties announced they would do so, actually "expands" the right to vote.
Read 9 tweets
13 Oct
FL Amend. 4 was supposed to re-enfranchise 1.4 million people w/ felony convictions. @tampabaytimes @propublica research shows only 31,400 Floridians w/ felony convictions have registered.

"it might be America’s biggest case of voter disenfranchisement."

tampabay.com/news/florida-p…
h/t @rickhasen and his indispensable Election Law Blog.
Notably, the story says that 31,400 is only people who served time in prison and have been released. So the number of new registrants is surely higher. But still, only "8 percent of FL's felons have registered to vote since Amendment 4 passed."
Read 7 tweets
12 Oct
It's time for the #KYSen debate between @AmyMcGrathKY and @LeaderMcConnell. Follow along, friends, and I'll give you the highlights. It's go time! 1/
McGrath: Hits McConnell right away for knowing about #COVID19 as early as January but not warning Kentuckians about the threat. 2/
McConnell: starts by congratulating McGrath on her military service.

Now we'll wait for McGrath to mention how she wrote to McConnell as a kid about how she wanted to be a fighter pilot and he never responded. It won't take long, I'm sure. 3/
Read 38 tweets
12 Oct
I agree that this is Groundhog Day--another day, another court deferring to the state legislature and state election officials on the voting process.
The court here basically says that voters will probably suffer an infringement of the constitutional right to vote, but that the judge's hands are tied because of SCOTUS and 11th Circuit's insistence on the Purcell Principle not to change rules too close to an election.
Notice how apologetic district judge is here. Court says Plaintiffs had very strong evidence that the voting machines will infringe the right to vote, but that it must reject the claim cause of appellate precedent.

It's the Purcell Principle and undue deference on steroids.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!