Is 2020 still competitive (RCP) or not really (538)?
2016
Actual Ntnl: Clinton +2.1
RCP Final: Clinton +3.2 (D+1.1)
538 Final: Clinton +3.9 (D+1.8)
2018
Actual House Ntnl: D+8.6%
RCP Final: D+7.3 (R+1.3)
538 Final (polls only): D+10.2 (D+1.6)
Avg Bias
RCP R+0.1%
538 D+1.7%
Look, let's be honest:
If Biden is up
4% in Arizona and Florida
6.5% in Pennsylvania
8%, on average, in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan
And within a whisker of Texas
Then 538 is actually being generous when it gives Trump a 12% chance of winning.
If, on the other hand:
Biden is up only:
1.5% in Florida
3% in Arizona
3.8% in Pennsylvania
5.2% in Nevada
And an average of 6.5% in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin
While:
Trump leads Texas by 4.4%
Uncertainty remains reasonably large:
(For RCP, I have used their basic map by shaded Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan light blue because Biden has a lead of 5.5% or greater per RCP in those states.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @cityoftoronto is flatly lying, as it has for at least a decade, about shelter space being available for people who are homeless. Today, a naive and unjust judge not only let Toronto get away with those lies, but crapped all over some of Toronto's most vulnerable citizens. 1/
So, here's a little story that shows what those who are homeless and those who advocate for them go through trying to get Shelter beds.
"I had extended the stay at the rooming house near Spadina and Dundas for the woman who had reported a sexual assault on June 19, 2/
as I was concerned that there was no available bed for her in the shelter system. In the afternoon of June 25, I visited that woman at the rooming house near Spadina/Dundas. While I was there, I noticed a young homeless man (Z.R.) hanging around the outside of the building." 3/
1/ Analyses of precinct data in NH suggest risk that fractional counting by machine may have moved results by 3-5% of gap between Sanders and Buttigieg. @jvgraz recently discussed 2016 suspicions per Stanford study (see also my work in CP + w/EJUSA and @LuluFriesdat led study).
2/ We cannot draw a conclusion of suspicion about movement from precincts of 349 or less to 350-1999 for Sanders v. Buttigieg. Comparing hand v. scanner counts? Sanders just did better in smallest townships. (Klobuchar diff. *is* suspicious per multivariate regression analysis.)
3/ I worked with an Ivy League trained prof. who uses quantitative and qualitative data in his research. We controlled for several factors like wealth.
#10at10 No. 48
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues: wp.me/P7gBVo-yC
-Warren up 15 delgs., Sanders, Biden, Buttigieg down 7, 7, and 1 respectively
-Sanders now within 0.4% of Biden in polling v. Trump avg., closest in my tracking over a year
#10at10 No. 49
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues: wp.me/P7gBVo-yC
-At 1.1 pt deficit, closest Sanders has been to Biden (also -1.1 Apr 1)
-Bloomberg steadily rising
-Deleg count hidden, updates tonight (IA NH NV SC), throughout week (Super Tues)
#10at10 No. 50
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues:
(Updating tonight) wp.me/P7gBVo-yC
-Sanders takes the lead in polling, delegates, and overall rank for first time going back to Jan. 2019
-Full Delg. Projection later tonight (could move a few)
Nate Silver remains the most sophisticated of the 8% of Democrats who have a very unfavorable dislike/hatred of Sanders. Watch what he is doing here. He's conceding lots to appear rational, but then he goes with a flat out falsehood. Bernie has don *a ton* to build coalitions.
Not only has he done a ton to build coalitions, but it shows in his numbers. He's 1st or 2nd in polling w/People of Color of a wide variety & overall (Biden #1 w/African Americans & overall, Sanders #2 for those & #1 w/ Latin Americans, tied for #1 w/ "other" per Morning Consult.
And this isn't a cherry-picked poll. It's based on five weeks of data in January and February, including more than 2000 POC respondents. Sanders coalition building goes well beyond improvements with POC, however ...