For #WorldEBHCDay we wanted to share our first #Tweetorial about the 5 determinants to consider when downgrading the certainty that we have in our evidence from RCTs when following the #GRADE approach @JBIEBHC@WorldEBHCDay (1/8)
Certainty in the evidence starts as high when following the #GRADE approach. However it may be necessary to downgrade the certainty in this evidence. We do this by assessing the following 5 determinants Guidance: shorturl.at/qxB68#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (2/8)
Study limitations. Consider the methodological quality of the included studies providing evidence of a particular outcome. Consider how each study contributes to the magnitude of effect and downgrade conservatively Guidance: shorturl.at/aepO1#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (3/8)
Inconsistency. Widely different and unexplained estimates of effect may warrant downgrading the certainty of the evidence. Wide variance in point estimates, minimal CI overlap, and high I2 indicate inconsistency. Guidance: shorturl.at/cntGT#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (4/8)
Imprecision. If we have an imprecise effect estimate we may downgrade our certainty. Imprecision could be the result of a small sample size, small no. of events and are identified by wide CIs or an OIS. Guidance: shorturl.at/wDFT9#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (5/8)
Indirectness. Certainty in the evidence is decreased when we have indirect evidence. Ask: Is the evidence synthesised applicable to our q? Look at the population, intervention, comparisons and outcomes measured. Guidance: shorturl.at/pqABM#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (6/8)
Publication bias. Systematic under- or over-estimation of the underlying effects due to selective publication of studies. If pub bias is suspected we can downgrade our certainty in the evidence. Guidance: shorturl.at/kpK46#Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (7/8)
Some considerations to close. Be conservative in downgrading the certainty. Reviewers will face close-call situations and should acknowledge these. All decisions for downgrading should be made transparent #Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (8/8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We enjoyed the first one so much, we thought we'd go again. Our second #WorldEBHCDay#Tweetorial we want to showcase is the infrequent times when you may need to upgrade the certainty you have in your evidence when following the #GRADE approach @JBIEBHC@WorldEBHCDay (1/8)
Evidence from observational studies and non-randomised experimental studies is (under most-circumstances) initially classified as low. However, there are rare occasions when these studies may provide higher than low certainty in the evidence #Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (2/8)
There are 3 determinants to consider when raising the certainty in the evidence. A large magnitude of effect, a dose response gradient and the effect of plausible residual confounding #Tweetorial#WorldEBHCDay (3/8)