For #WorldEBHCDay we wanted to share our first #Tweetorial about the 5 determinants to consider when downgrading the certainty that we have in our evidence from RCTs when following the #GRADE approach @JBIEBHC @WorldEBHCDay (1/8)
Certainty in the evidence starts as high when following the #GRADE approach. However it may be necessary to downgrade the certainty in this evidence. We do this by assessing the following 5 determinants Guidance: shorturl.at/qxB68 #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (2/8)
Study limitations. Consider the methodological quality of the included studies providing evidence of a particular outcome. Consider how each study contributes to the magnitude of effect and downgrade conservatively Guidance: shorturl.at/aepO1 #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (3/8)
Inconsistency. Widely different and unexplained estimates of effect may warrant downgrading the certainty of the evidence. Wide variance in point estimates, minimal CI overlap, and high I2 indicate inconsistency. Guidance: shorturl.at/cntGT #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (4/8)
Imprecision. If we have an imprecise effect estimate we may downgrade our certainty. Imprecision could be the result of a small sample size, small no. of events and are identified by wide CIs or an OIS. Guidance: shorturl.at/wDFT9 #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (5/8)
Indirectness. Certainty in the evidence is decreased when we have indirect evidence. Ask: Is the evidence synthesised applicable to our q? Look at the population, intervention, comparisons and outcomes measured. Guidance: shorturl.at/pqABM #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (6/8)
Publication bias. Systematic under- or over-estimation of the underlying effects due to selective publication of studies. If pub bias is suspected we can downgrade our certainty in the evidence. Guidance: shorturl.at/kpK46 #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (7/8)
Some considerations to close. Be conservative in downgrading the certainty. Reviewers will face close-call situations and should acknowledge these. All decisions for downgrading should be made transparent #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (8/8)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JBI Adelaide GRADE Centre

JBI Adelaide GRADE Centre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JBI_GRADE

20 Oct
We enjoyed the first one so much, we thought we'd go again. Our second #WorldEBHCDay #Tweetorial we want to showcase is the infrequent times when you may need to upgrade the certainty you have in your evidence when following the #GRADE approach @JBIEBHC @WorldEBHCDay (1/8)
Evidence from observational studies and non-randomised experimental studies is (under most-circumstances) initially classified as low. However, there are rare occasions when these studies may provide higher than low certainty in the evidence #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (2/8)
There are 3 determinants to consider when raising the certainty in the evidence. A large magnitude of effect, a dose response gradient and the effect of plausible residual confounding #Tweetorial #WorldEBHCDay (3/8)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!