Ben Rhodes Profile picture
20 Oct, 12 tweets, 2 min read
1. It's hard to overstate what callous disregard this shows for the safety of our diplomats and intelligence officers, and how much the obsession with undoing Obama's Cuba policy while currying favor with Russia and China drove Trump's policy. nytimes.com/2020/10/19/us/…
2. Many of us who worked on Cuba in the Obama Administration suspected Russian involvement from the beginning. When I conducted secret negotiations with the Cubans, I was occasionally tailed by Russians.
3. This included being followed to a Canadian hotel where I had a secret meeting with Cuban officials in 2014, and being tailed by Russians in Havana.
4. At the time that these attacks apparently occurred in Cuba, the Cuban government was trying to preserve the opening between the U.S. and Cuba and to forge diplomatic contacts with the incoming Trump Administration.
5. It never made sense that the Cubans would be simultaneously carrying out sophisticated attacks against U.S. personnel that would plainly put at risk their interest in continuing the opening with the U.S.
6. But Trump wanted to undo Obama's accomplishment and appeal to hardliners in Miami so he was happy to basically empty out the U.S. Embassy in Havana to the point that it couldn't even process visas for Cubans to see their families in the U.S.
7. Meanwhile, there were apparently similar attacks happening in Russia and China. While we heard a lot about the attacks in Cuba we heard nothing about these other attacks that harmed people serving the U.S. government
8. Trump can't find a single bad word to say about Vladimir Putin and lavished praise on Xi Jinping in futile pursuit of a trade deal, ignoring all of the other U.S. interests that were suffering vis-a-vis China.
9. So while the U.S. personnel harmed in Cuba served a domestic political interest for Trump, the U.S. personnel harmed in Russia and China were an inconvenience to Trump, something to be covered up.
10. Quite an irony for someone who railed about diplomatic security in Benghazi for years.
11. The bottom line? This is a President who sees everything - from national interests to the safety of those who serve our nation - as simply an extension of his own personal political interests. He and those who serve him care only about Trump's interests, not America's.
12. One other thing should be clear in this murky story: the idea that Cuba carried out these attacks in multiple countries around the world is absurd, but that is clearly less important to Trump than his interest in casting himself as the leader of some 21st century Bay of Pigs

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Rhodes

Ben Rhodes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brhodes

11 Jul
The collapse of governance during COVID-19 and corruption of democracy demands that we vote Republicans out up and down the ballot and support candidates who will put people first. Here are some good people to support and things to do, starting here: votesaveamerica.com
In Michigan (my adopted state!) here are three amazing Democrats with strong national security backgrounds and deep local roots: secure.actblue.com/donate/fp4m
Today I'm happy to be doing a fundraiser in support of exactly the kind of brilliant next-generation leader we need - Yassamin has already helped fight climate change at the global level and now she's gone home to make change in Phoenix: secure.numero.ai/contribute/yas…
Read 6 tweets
28 Jun
1. I have trouble believing it, but as someone who got the presidential daily briefing for more than 7 years the idea that a POTUS wouldn’t be briefed on a Russian bounty on US troops is even more alarming.
2. Given the hundreds of pieces of intel that would be briefed to him in this period, did the intel community think Trump wouldn’t care? That strikes at the heart of his responsibility as commander in chief.
3. Did they think he wouldn’t do anything in response or wouldn’t want to be bothered? That raises questions about whether he cares about our troops.
Read 9 tweets
27 Apr
1. Informed by the experience of the 08 financial crisis, the one thing we can be sure of about the COVID-19 crisis - including the economic and political fallout - is that it will be bigger and less predictable than people anticipate .
2. An economic shock of this size and scale will ripple for a long time, impacting not just businesses but peoples' own sense of how they relate to the economy, how their family can have any security, and what they want to do with their lives.
3. Governments - especially our own - are not well positioned to respond. Trump's tax bill emptied out the coffers. We've had low rates. The Fed has already fired a bunch of bullets. And the emergency spending feels like a drop in an ocean.
Read 14 tweets
30 Sep 19
1. As Republicans have (so far) shown no willingness to break from Trump, it's worth considering how much worse things could get under Trump if he continues to have this kind of firewall of propaganda and defense from the right, no matter what he does.
2. Consider the shifting of norms of the presidency from '17 to '19. Trump attacked his own State Dept and IC, turned the Justice Dept into his private law firm, used State and DoJ to go after his political opponents, and shifted US foreign policy to acting on behalf of dictators
3. He has also stonewalled Congress, ignored laws they passed, threatened violence against his opponents (with real consequences), politicized the US military, and increasingly surrounded himself with compliant yes men.
Read 14 tweets
17 Apr 19
1/ One big problem with how foreign policy is filtered through the Washington political and media filter is that action is treated as a result and not as a means to an end. This is how one looks "tough" without accomplishing anything.
2/ The purpose of Trump's hardline Cuba policy is to change the Cuban regime. It will fail to do that, just as 60 years of an Embargo failed to change the Cuban regime.
3 / Instead, Trump's policy will only further entrench the Cuban Communist Party, which is perfectly comfortable being an antagonist to a right-wing American government.
Read 14 tweets
22 Feb 19
1/4 It is possible to think that a) Venezuelans would be much better off without Maduro, and b) Trump's policy (and bluster) is creating the impression of U.S.-imposed regime change which raises lots of risks, including military intervention (which the opposition could call for)
2/4 It doesn't help that Trump is obviously disingenuous. He embraces dictators around the world while talking up democracy in Venezuela and Cuba. And he unsubtly - in his SOTU and in Miami - views Venezuela as a domestic political issue tied to his 2020 reelection campaign.
3/4 The political-media consensus that Dems should have no daylight with Trump on Venezuela adds to a tradition: it is seen as politically damaging to oppose U.S.-imposed or supported regime change, despite the results of those efforts (which often get worse after regime change)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!